A Multidimensional Approach for Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) Assessment: The Cilento Coast Case Study (Italy) | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Multidimensional Approach for Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) Assessment: The Cilento Coast Case Study (Italy)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12955))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1540 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation of the Cultural Ecosystem Services represents an evolving research field that analyses the processes of enhancing the landscape and its components. The contribution presents a multidimensional approach for identifying and evaluating the Cultural Ecosystem Services that characterize the coastal strip of Cilento and, specifically, within the Municipality of Camerota, in the South of Italy, and developing a culture-led enhancement strategy.

The methodological framework consists of three main phases: the first, knowledge and interpretation, the second evaluation, and the third elaboration of a situated strategy for the Baia degli Infreschi, a natural inlet of great interest in landscape and tourism in the Municipality of Camerota. A Decision Support System has been structured by developing a hybrid evaluative process that combines the SODA approach, the GeoTOPSIS spatial multi-criteria analysis and the ANP multi-criteria method by integrating the principles of Maritime Spatial Planning and the Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 13727
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carta, M.: Dal waterfront alla città liquida. Patologie relazionali e nuovi orizzonti del progetto. In: De Luca, G., Lingua, V. (eds.) Arcipelago Mediterraneo. Strategie di riqualificazione e sviluppo nelle città-porto delle isole, Alinea, pp. 27–40 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clemente, M.: Sea and the city: maritime identity for urban sustainable regeneration. TRIA Territorio Della Ricerca Su Insediamenti e Ambiente 11(2), 19–34 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konvitz, J.: Cities and the sea: port city planning in early modern Europe. Urban History 7, 113 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926800004582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostrom, E.: A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325(5939), 419–422 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Antrop, M.: The language of landscape ecologists and planners: a comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 55(3), 163–173 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Costanza, R., Folke, C.: Valuing ecosystem services with efficiency, fairness and sustainability as goals. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, pp. 49–68 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA): Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island, Washington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, J.: Landscape sustainability science: ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 28(6), 999–1023 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bastian, O., Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R.-U., Walz, U., Wende, W.: Landscape services: the concept and its practical relevance. Landscape Ecol. 29(9), 1463–1479 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0064-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cerreta, M., Poli, G.: Landscape services assessment: a hybrid multi-criteria spatial decision support system (MC-SDSS). Sustainability 9(8), 1311 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Pushpam Kumar. Earthscan: London and Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Environment Agency (EEA): Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): 2011 Update. EEA/BSS/07/007, November 2011, pp. 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Union: Maritime Spatial Planning 2014/89/UE (2014). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0089&from=EN

  14. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., Fish, R.: Classifying ecosystem services: an ecosystems knowledge network briefing paper. ecosystems knowledge network (2012). https://ecosystemsknowledge.net/sites/default/files/wpcontent/uploads/2012/10/

  15. Arias-Arévalo, P., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Pérez-Rincón, M.: Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods. The White Horse Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cerreta, M., Daldanise, G., Regalbuto, S.: Collaboriamo per Crapolla: una strategia di governance innovativa per una gestione integrata e adattiva. In: AA.VV. Supporto tecnico-scientifico a programmi di conservazione, miglioramento della fruizione e valorizzazione dell’Abbazia di San Pietro a Crapolla (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coccossis H., Nijkamp P.: Planning for our cultural heritage. Aldershot, Avebury (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sauer, C.O.: The morphology of landscape. Univ. Calif. Publ. Geogr. 2, 19–54 (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Selicato, M., Torre, C.M., La Trofa, G.: Prospect of integrate monitoring: A multidimensional approach, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7334 LNCS (PART 2), pp. 144–156 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cerreta, M., Panaro, S., Poli, G.: A spatial decision support system for multifunctional landscape assessment: a transformative resilience perspective for vulnerable inland areas. Sustainability 13(5), 2748, 1–23 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cerreta, M., di Girasole, E.G., Poli, G., Regalbuto, S.: Operationalizing the circular city model for naples’ city-port: a hybrid development strategy. Sustainability 12(7), 2927 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Funtowicz S. O., Martinez-Alier J., Munda G., Ravetz J.: Multicriteria-based environmental policy. In: Abaza H., Baranzini A. (ed.), Implementing sustainable development. UNEP/Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 53–77 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eden, C., Simpson, P.: SODA and cognitive mapping in practice. In: Rosenhead, J. (ed.) Rational analysis for a problematic world, pp. 43–70. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saaty T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Saaty T.L., Vargas L. G.: Decision making with the Analytic Network Process. Springer Science, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

  26. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: The analytic network process. in: decision making with the analytic network process. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 195. Springer, Boston (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cerreta, M., Panaro, S.: Deliberative spatial multi-criteria evaluation (DSM-CE): forming shared cultural values. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10406 LNCS, pp. 77–90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_53

  28. Torre, C.M., Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Social balance and economic effectiveness in historic centers rehabilitation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 9157, 317–329 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hwang CL., Yoon K.: Methods for multiple attribute decision making. in: multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186. Springer, Heidelberg (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3

  30. Olson, D.L.: Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models. Math. Comput. Model 40, 721–727 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Cerreta, M., Malangone, V.: Valutazioni multi-metodologiche per il paesaggio storico urbano: la valle dei mulini di Amalfi. BDC Bollettino del Centro Calza Bini 14, 39–61 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chan, K.M.A., Satterfield, T., Goldstein, J.: Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol. Econ. 74, 8–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cerreta, M., De Toro, P.: Integrated spatial assessment (ISA): a multi-methodological approach for planning choices. In: Advances in Spatial Planning, Burian, J. Ed, IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, pp. 77–108 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Daily, G.C., et al.: Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Ecol. Environ. 7(1), 21–28 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Daldanise, G.: From place-branding to community-branding: a collaborative decision-making process for cultural heritage enhancement. Sustainability 12, 10399 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cerreta, M., Poli, G., Regalbuto, S., Mazzarella, C.: A multi-dimensional decision-making process for regenerative landscapes: a new harbour for Naples (Italy). In: Misra, S., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11622, pp. 156–170. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, via Toledo 402, 80134, Naples, Italy

    Maria Cerreta, Benedetta Ettorre & Giuliano Poli

  2. Institute for Research On Innovation and Services for Development (IRISS), National Research Council Italy (CNR), via Guglielmo Sanfelice, 8, Naples, Italy

    Maria Cerreta & Massimo Clemente

Authors
  1. Maria Cerreta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Massimo Clemente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benedetta Ettorre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuliano Poli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Cerreta, M. Clemente, B.E., G.P.; methodology, M.Cerreta, M. Clemente, B.E., G.P.; validation, M.Cerreta, M. Clemente; formal analysis, B.E., G.P.; investigation, B.E.; writing-original draft preparation, B.E.; writing-review and editing, M.Cerreta, M. Clemente, B.E., G.P.; visualization, B.E.; supervision, M.Cerreta, M. Clemente. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cerreta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Chiara Garau

  5. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Ivan Blečić

  6. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  7. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  8. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A. C. Rocha

  9. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo Maria Torre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cerreta, M., Clemente, M., Ettorre, B., Poli, G. (2021). A Multidimensional Approach for Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) Assessment: The Cilento Coast Case Study (Italy). In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12955. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87006-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87007-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation