Abstract
The experience is part of a broader one, Geodesign Brazil: Trees for metropolitan regions, composed of a set of workshops that were held in twelve Brazilian metropolitan areas, that in Amapa was conducted by technicians of two planning state departments. The workshop aimed to develop dialogs and proposals for alternative futures to the metropolitan region, targeting the years of 2035 and 2050. The goal was to discuss ten main topics: vegetation, hydrography, housing, transportation, institutions, trade and industry, agriculture, energy, tourism and culture, and carbon credit. The GISColab platform was used as a tool for registering opinions, alerts, ideas and voting of designs for each scenario. The workshop was developed over four stages: reading enrichment and note creation; creation of proposals with that continued the existing planning; creation of proposals with some innovations; creation of proposals with many innovations and a final voting. The experience pointed to an active participation of the actors in the discussion process, but a limitation in changing from analysis to proposals, mainly accepting innovative ideas, a fact possibly related to the wide technical experience of the participants in public agencies, who acted during the meetings in the same way that they do in their professional practices: discussing the difficulties and consequences of implementing innovations. However, as a result, when comparing the first designs to the last ones, it was possible to observe improvements in performance and an adherence to a new way of planning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
The experiment was a joint effort by twelve Brazilian metropolitan areas, through ten federal universities (UFMG, UFRRJ, UFJF, USP, UFCF, UFPE, UFG, UFPA, UFT, UNIFAP), two state universities (UDESC and UNESP at Rio Claro) and two offices related to the secretary of planning (SEMA and STRAP). The common goal was to discuss proposals for different scenarios, in the years of 2035 and 2050. The goal was to be part of the IGC’s global project.
- 3.
References
Moura, A.C.M., Santana, S.: From authorial drawings to the parametric modeling of territorial occupation: representation and modeling influences in the process of designing the urban space. Rev. Brasileira. Cartogr. 66(7), 1451–1463 (2014)
Moura, A.C.M.: O Geodesign como processo de co-criação de acordos coletivos para a paisagem territorial e urbana. In: Ladwig, N.I., Campos, J.B., (org.). Planejamento e gestão territorial: o papel e os instrumentos do planejamento territorial na interface entre o urbano e o rural. Criciúma (SC). UNESC, Cap. 1 (2019)
Arnstein, S.R.: A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 35(4), 216–224 (1969)
Steinitz, C.: A framework for Geodesign – changing geography by design. ESRI Press, Redlands (2012)
Moura, A.C.M., Freitas, C.R.: Brazilian geodesign platform webgis and SDI and geodesign as cocreation and geocollaboration. In: Gervasi, O. (ed.) Computational Science and Its Applications ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 332–348. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_24
Porto, J.L.R.: The construction of Amapá urban-metropolitan condition. ISSN 1980–5772 e ISSN 2177–4307 ACTA Geográfica, Boa Vista, v.12, n.29, mai./ago. De, pp. 145–159 (2018)
ALAP – ASSEMBLEIA LEGISLATIVA DO ESTADO DO AMAPÁ: Lei Complementar nº 0021, de 26 de fevereiro de 2003. Institui a Região Metropolitana do Município de Macapá, Estado do Amapá, e dá outras providências (2003)
ALAP – ASSEMBLEIA LEGISLATIVA DO ESTADO DO AMAPÁ: Lei Complementar nº 95, de 17 de maio de 2016. Dá nova redação ao Parágrafo único do art. 1º da Lei Complementar nº 0021, de 26 de fevereiro de 2003, que inclui o Município de Mazagão à Região Metropolitana de Macapá AP (2003)
AMAPÁ (Estado): Governo do Estado oficializa criação da Região Metropolitana de Macapá. Amapá, 09 de abril de (2018). Disponível em: https://portal.ap.gov.br/noticia/0904/governo-do-estado-oficializa-criacao-da-regiao-metropolitana-de-macapacessadoem. acessado em 05 Apr 2021
NERI, Sara Heloiza, A.: A Utilização das ferramentas de Geoprocessamento para identificação de comunidades expostas a hepatite A nas áreas de ressacas dos municípios de Macapá e Santana/AP. Tese (Engenharia Civil), Programa de Pós-Graduação de Engenharia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, p.189 (2015)
Souza, J.S.A.: Qualidade de vida urbana em áreas úmidas: Ressacas de Macapá e Santana - AP. Tese M.Sc., CDS/UNB, Brasília/DF, Brasil (2003)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank CNPq support through the project 401066/2016-9 and FAPEMIG PPM-00368-18. We thank the pos-graduation programs the support for participation in the event (Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Geografia, Análise e Modelagem de Sistemas Ambientais).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martínez, G.A.T., de Vargas Vieira, F.C., Rocha, C.C., Palheta, A.C.M., Neri, S.H.A. (2021). Using Geodesign to Plan the Future of Macapa Metropolitan Region, State of Amapa, Brazil: A Support to Expanding Collaborative Technical Performance. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12954. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86978-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86979-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)