Evaluating Second Generation Cross-Country Open Legal Data Infrastructures Using Value Models | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Evaluating Second Generation Cross-Country Open Legal Data Infrastructures Using Value Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Participation (ePart 2021)

Abstract

Access to legal information is of critical importance to socio-economic and political activity. Hence, the provision of capabilities to search for, locate and retrieve legal information in an efficient and structured manner to governments, businesses, lawyers and citizens is highly valuable. In order to satisfy the requirement for legal information, a ‘first generation’ of open legal data infrastructures that focus on providing access to national legislation and offer some basic functionalities for the providers and the users of these data, is already available in many countries. However, rapid globalization, the emergence of supra-national unions of nations, the advent of advanced data processing capabilities, and the ever-increasing complexity of legislation as it comes to mirror modern life have all contributed to the development of more advanced ‘second generation’ open legal data infrastructures that facilitate access to legal information from multiple national legal frameworks in multiple languages. In the face of the advent of these new technologies, it becomes vital to understand how their performance could be evaluated. This paper presents and validates a methodology for evaluating the emerging second generation of Big Open Linked Legal Data (BOLLD) e-infrastructures based on the concept of ‘value model’ estimations from users’ evaluation ratings. The proposed approach advances beyond the traditional Information Systems (IS) evaluation approaches, as it includes assessments not only of the magnitudes of a wide range of types of value generated by such an infrastructure, but also of the relations among them. The proposed model, therefore, enables a deeper understanding of the whole value generation mechanism, and also can provide a rational definition of priorities for system improvement based on the capabilities offered to users. A first application of the developed approach is made for the evaluation of an advanced second generation BOLLD e-infrastructure developed as part of the European project ManyLaws, leading to both interesting insights as well as improvement priorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Union: Shaping Europe’s Digital Future – Factsheet (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_20_278

  2. Virkar, S., Alexopoulos, C., Stavropoulou, S., Tsekeridou, S., Novak, A., Charalabidis, Y.: User-centric decision support system design in legal informatics: a typology of users. In: Charalabidis, Y., Cunha, M.A., Sarantis, D. (eds.) Proceedings – ICEGOV 2020 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 23–25 September 2020, Athens, Greece, pp. 711–722. ACM Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charalabidis, Y., Loutsaris, M.A., Virkar, S., Alexopoulos, C., Novak, A.-S., Lachana, Z.: Use case scenarios on legal machine learning. In: Ben Dhaou, S., Carter, L., Gregory, M. (eds.) Proceedings - ICEGOV 2019 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 3–5 April 2019, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, pp. 364–373. ACM Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Virkar, S., Tsekeridou, S., Romas, I., Alexopoulos, C.: Towards comprehensive legal information search and retrieval: learning and building from evaluated projects. In: Proceedings - Internationales Rechtsinformatik Symposion, IRIS 2020, 27–29 February 2020, Salzburg, Austria (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pazalos, K., Loukis, E., Nikolopoulos, V.: A structured methodology for assessing and improving e-services in digital cities. Telematics Inform. (SCOPUS) 29, 123–136 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loukis, E., Pazalos, K., Salagara, A.: Transforming e-services evaluation data into business analytics using value models. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 11(2), 129–141 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Charalabidis, Y., Loukis, E., Alexopoulos, C.: Evaluating second generation open government data infrastructures using value models. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 2114–2126 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loukis, E., Leou, T.: Evaluating complex government SAAS through value flow model estimation. In: Proceedings of 13th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS 2019), Naples, Italy (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. DeLone, D.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeLone, D.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Information systems success measurement. Found. Trends Inf. Syst. 2(1), 1–116 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seddon, P.B.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smithson, S., Hirscheim, R.: Analysing information systems evaluation: another look at an old problem. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 7, 158–174 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Farbey, B., Land, F., Targett, D.: Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 189–207 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Willcocks, L., Graeser, V.: Delivering IT and e-Business Value. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Irani, Z.: Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain. Inf. Manag. 40(1), 11–24 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gunasekaran, A., Ngai, E.W.T., McGaughey, R.E.: Information technology and systems justification: a review for research and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 173, 957–983 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Irani, Z., Love, P.: Information systems evaluation - a crisis of understanding. In: Irani, Z., Love, P. (eds.) Evaluating Information Systems - Public and Private Sector. Butterworth-Heinemann (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Akoka, J.: A taxonomy of evaluation methods for information systems artifacts. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 32(3), 229–267 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greene, W.H.: Econometric Analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Alexopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Virkar, S. (2021). Evaluating Second Generation Cross-Country Open Legal Data Infrastructures Using Value Models. In: Edelmann, N., et al. Electronic Participation. ePart 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12849. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82824-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82823-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82824-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics