Abstract
Specialists now make the most of information and communication technologies at all stages of disaster risk management. These technologies, along with the ever-increasing number of Internet of Things devices, can assist in disaster risk reduction or emergency response decisions. At the same time, the existing Cyber-Physical Systems of natural disaster risk management are based on mathematical methods. But mathematical (quantitative) methods have a number of drawbacks, therefore, expert (qualitative) assessments are the only means of solving many control problems due to the ease of use for predicting almost any situation, including in conditions of incomplete information. Research aimed at developing a general methodology for managing disaster response shows that it is possible to view response management as a process and production management problem. Based on this view, process and production management system technology can be used to develop a common framework for a disaster risk management system. A model of situational management of such systems based on qualitative methods is proposed. The model will allow the creation of automatic cyber-physical systems for disaster risk management. At the same time, the proposed model is devoid of the shortcomings of mathematical models and is close to the human way of expressing knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li, W.-S., Chang, C.-L., Chen, K.-H., Lee, Y.: How ICT changes the landscape of disaster risk management. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds.) ITDRR 2017. IAICT, vol. 516, pp. 12–18. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18293-9_2
The SmartAmerica Challenge. https://smartamerica.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2020
Zhang, W.J., Deters, R., Liu, X., Tu, Y.L., Li, W., Chai, C.-L.: A disaster response management system based on the control systems technology. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. 4(3), 274–295 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2008.017441
Klykov, Y.I.: Situational management of large systems. Energy, Moscow (1974)
Pospelov, D.A.: Situational Management: Theory and Practice. Nauka, Moscow (1986)
Rakov, V.I.: System analysis (initial concepts): a textbook for students of higher educational institutions. Publishing House Academic Natural Sciences, Moscow (2012)
Moglyachev, A.V.: Cognitive analysis of situational management in the field of tariff regulation of water supply and sanitation in the region. Bull. Samara State University Econ. 12(62), 82–86 (2009)
Vasiliev, V.I., Ilyasov, B.G.: Intelligent management systems. Theories and practice: a training manual. Radio Engineering, Moscow (2009)
Gulmamedov, R.G.: The method of constructing a strategy in situational management systems. Inf. Manag. Syst. 6, 36–39 (2011)
Yampolskii, S.M.: A situational approach to the management of organizational and technical systems in the planning of operations. High Technol. Space Res. Earth 2 8, 62–69 (2016)
Melekhin, V.B., Shikhalieva, N.S.: Theoretical aspects of effective management of the behavior of socio-economic objects in an unstable environment. Internet J. Naukovedenie 4(23), 1–12 (2014). http://naukovedenie.ru Accessed 30 Sept 2020
Yedilkhan, D., Uskenbayeva, R.K., Kurmangaliyeva, B.K.: Situational management for process implementation of working operations of the business. In: 54th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), pp. 292–297 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SICE.2015.7285573
Grebennik, I., Reshetnik, V., Ovezgeldyyev, A., Ivanov, V., Urniaieva, I.: Strategy of effective decision-making in planning and elimination of consequences of emergency situations. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds.) ITDRR 2018. IAICT, vol. 550, pp. 66–75. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32169-7_6
Grebennik, I., Khriapkin, O., Ovezgeldyyev, A., Pisklakova, V., Urniaieva, I.: The concept of a regional information-analytical system for emergency situations. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds.) ITDRR 2017. IAICT, vol. 516, pp. 55–66. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18293-9_6
Grebennik, I., Semenets, V., Hubarenko, Y.: Information technologies for assessing the impact of climate change and natural disasters in socio-economic systems. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds.) ITDRR 2019. IAICT, vol. 575, pp. 21–30. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48939-7_3
Beltramo, R., Cantore, P., Vesce, E., Margarita, S., De Bernardi, P.: The Internet of things for natural risk management (Inte.Ri.M.). In: IntechOpen (2018). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81707
Hutsa, O.M., Yelchaninov, D.B., Porvan, A.P., Yakubovskaya, S.V.: Decision support systems in project management based on qualitative methods. News NTU “KhPI”. Seriya Syst. Anal. Manag. Inf. Technol. 3(1225), 82–88 (2017). https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2017.1225.15
Hutsa, O.M. Yelchaninov, D.B., Peresada, O.V., Dovgopol, N.V.: Automation of processes in socio-economic systems based on situational management. In: Linde, I., Chumachenko, I., Timofeyev, V. (eds.) Information Systems and Innovative Technologies in Project and Program Management: Collective Monograph, pp. 138–150. ISMA, Riga (2019)
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A.: Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Larichev, O.I.: Verbal Decision Analysis. Nauka, Moscow (2006)
Borcherding, K., Schmeer, S., Weber, M.: Biases in multiattribute weight elicitation. In: Caverni, J.-P. et al. (eds.) Contributions to Decision Research, pp. 3–28. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1995)
Von Winterfeldt, D., Fischer, G.W.: Multiattribute utility theory: models and assessment procedures. In: Wendt, D., Vlek, C. (eds.) Utility, Probability and Human Decision Making, pp. 47–86. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975)
Larichev, O.I.: Theory and decision-making methods, as well as the Chronicle of events in the Magic countries: Textbook. Logos, Moscow (2000)
Hämäläinen, R.P., Mats, R.K., Lindstedt, K.S.: Multiattribute risk analysis in nuclear emergency management. Risk Anal. 4(20), 455–468 (2000)
Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0.2. https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF. Accessed 30 Sept 2020
Hutsa, O.M.: Knowledge-Oriented Technologies for Solving Organizational Problems in Business: Monograph. Ltd “Company SMIT”, Kharkiv (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Grebennik, I., Hutsa, O., Petrova, R., Yelchaninov, D., Morozova, A. (2021). Information Technology Based on Qualitative Methods in Cyber-Physical Systems of Situational Disaster Risk Management. In: Murayama, Y., Velev, D., Zlateva, P. (eds) Information Technology in Disaster Risk Reduction. ITDRR 2020. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 622. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81469-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81469-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81468-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81469-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
