Abstract
Emerging technologies like Blockchain are firms’ important resources, rendering it significant to clarify their generation mechanisms. One potential way is knowledge search, which is an essential source of firms’ lacking knowledge. There are two types of search: local search and boundary-spanning search. They have a different impact on innovative outcomes. Besides, the innovations of emerging technologies have two aspects: R&D aspect and application aspect, depending on the domain to which the target of an innovation belongs. Because of the distinct features of these two aspects, knowledge search may influence R&D innovations and application innovations differently. We empirically test our hypotheses on Blockchain patent data retrieved from PATSTAT. The results show that there exist different effects that knowledge search has on R&D innovations and application innovations. While searching across the boundary may benefit patent novelty in application innovations, it will improve patent quality in R&D innovations. Our study has many academic contributions and practical implications, and its limitations leave room for further research on the topic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rotolo, D., Hicks, D., Martin, B.R.: What is an emerging technology? Res. Pol. 44(10), 1827–1843 (2015)
Filippova, E., Scharl, A., Filippov, P.: Blockchain: an empirical investigation of its scope for improvement. In: International Conference on Blockchain (2019)
Bruens, B., Moehrle, M.G.: Understanding the diffusion of the blockchain technology: a patent-based analysis using the tf-lag-idf for term novelty evaluation. In: PICMET 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (2018)
Kim, H., Kim, J., Jang, K., Han, J.: Are the blockchain-based patents sustainable for increasing firm value? Sustainability 12(5), 1–17 (2020)
Salviotti, G., De Rossi, L.M., Abbatemarco, N.: A structured framework to assess the business application landscape of blockchain technologies. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2018)
Lin, R., Xie, Z., Hao, Y., Wang, J.: Improving high-tech enterprise innovation in big data environment: a combinative view of internal and external governance. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 50, 575–585 (2020)
Ferreras-Méndez, J.L., Newell, S., Fernández-Mesa, A., Alegre, J.: Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: the mediating role of absorptive capacity. Ind. Mark. Manage. 47, 86–97 (2015)
Teece, D.J.: Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Pol. 15(6), 285–305 (1986)
Shenkar, O., Li, J.: Knowledge search in international cooperative ventures. Organ. Sci. 10(2), 134–143 (1999)
Srinivasan, R.: Sources, characteristics and effects of emerging technologies: research opportunities in innovation. Ind. Mark. Manage. 37(6), 633–640 (2008)
Rosenkopf, L., Nerkar, A.: Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 22(4), 287–306 (2001)
Sidhu, J.S., Commandeur, H.R., Volberda, H.W.: The multifaceted nature of exploration and exploitation: value of supply, demand, and spatial search for innovation. Organ. Sci. 18(1), 20–38 (2007)
Jung, H.J., Lee, J.J.: The quest for originality: a new typology of knowledge search and breakthrough inventions. Acad. Manage. J. 59(5), 1725–1753 (2016)
Ahuja, G., Lampert, C.M.: Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strateg. Manage. J. 22(6–7), 521–543 (2001)
Fleming, L.: Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Manage. Sci. 47(1), 117–132 (2001)
Capaldo, A., Lavie, D., Messeni Petruzzelli, A.: Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: the roles of knowledge distance and adoption. J. Manage. 43(2), 503–533 (2017)
Rosenkopf, L., Almeida, P.: Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Manage. Sci. 49(6), 751–766 (2003)
March, J.G.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 71–87 (1991)
Katila, R., Ahuja, G.: Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Manage. J. 45(6), 1183–1194 (2002)
Stuart, T.E., Podolny, J.M.: Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strateg. Manage. J. 17(S1), 21–38 (1996)
Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly, C.A.: Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Manage. Rev. 38(4), 8–29 (1996)
Weitzman, M.L.: Recombinant growth. Q. J. Econ. 113(2), 331–360 (1998)
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., Tushman, M.L.: Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Acad. Manage. Ann. 4(1), 109–155 (2010)
Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.: University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of invention. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 5(1), 19–50 (1997)
Singh, J., Fleming, L.: Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: myth or reality? Manage. Sci. 56(1), 41–56 (2010)
Fleming, L., Mingo, S., Chen, D.: Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm. Sci. Q. 52(3), 443–475 (2007)
Ahuja, G., Katila, R.: Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strateg. Manag. J. 25(8–9), 887–907 (2004)
Birnbaum, R., Christensen, C., Raynor, M.: The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Academe (2005)
Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2015)
Nomura Research Institute: Survey on blockchain technologies and related services. In: Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, no. March, pp. 1–78 (2016)
Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P.A., Adams, P.R., Mentanko, J., Ha, D., Green, S.: Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: a systematic review. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 51, 102029 (2020)
Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y.K., Misra, S.K., Rana, N.P., Raghavan, V., Akella, V.: Blockchain research, practice and policy: applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 49(April), 114–129 (2019)
Kshetri, N.: 1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 39, 80–89 (2018)
Leng, J., et al.: Blockchain-empowered sustainable manufacturing and product lifecycle management in industry 4.0: a survey. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 132, 110112 (2020)
Bumblauskas, D., Mann, A., Dugan, B., Rittmer, J.: A blockchain use case in food distribution: do you know where your food has been? Int. J. Inf. Manage. 52, 102008 (2020)
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., Smolander, K.: Where is current research on Blockchain technology? - a systematic review. PLoS One 11(10), e0163477 (2016)
Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P.A., Mozafari, M., Ha, D.: An empirical study of the rise of big data in business scholarship. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 403–413 (2016)
Arts, S., Veugelers, R.: Technology familiarity, recombinant novelty, and breakthrough invention. Ind. Corp. Chang. 24(6), 1215–1246 (2015)
Wu, L., Hitt, L., Lou, B.: Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity. Manage. Sci. 66(5), 2017–2039 (2020)
de Rassenfosse, G., Dernis, H., Boedt, G.: An introduction to the patstat database with example queries. Aust. Econ. Rev. 47(3), 395–408 (2014)
Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Porter, A.L., Guo, Y., Zhu, D.: A patent analysis method to trace technology evolutionary pathways. Scientometrics 100(3), 705–721 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1317-4
Arts, S., Cassiman, B., Gomez, J.C.: Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strateg. Manage. J. 39(1), 62–84 (2018)
Drobyazko, S., Makedon, V., Zhuravlov, D., Buglak, Y., Stetsenko, V.: Ethical, technological and patent aspects of technology blockchain distribution. J. Leg. Ethical Regul. Issues 22(Special Issue 2), 1–6 (2019)
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)
Bellstam, G., Bhagat, S., Cookson, J.A.: A text-based analysis of corporate innovation. SSRN Electron. J. (2016)
Trevor Rogers, F.: Patent text similarity and cross-cultural venture-backed innovation. J. Behav. Exp. Financ. 26, 100319 (2020)
Lanjouw, J.O., Schankerman, M.: Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econ. J. 114(495), 441–465 (2004)
Jaffe, A.B.: Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. Am. Econ. Rev. 76, 984–999 (1986)
Chen, L., Xu, S., Zhu, L., Zhang, J., Lei, X., Yang, G.: A deep learning based method for extracting semantic information from patent documents. Scientometrics 125(1), 289–312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03634-y
Lee, J.S., Hsiang, J.: Measuring patent claim generation by span relevancy arXiv. 2019
Liu, Y., et al.: RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach, arXiv. 2019
Nerkar, A.: Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge. Manage. Sci. 49(2), 211–229 (2003)
Singh, J.: Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Pol. 37(1), 77–96 (2008)
Islam, E., Zein, J.: Inventor CEOs. J. Financ. Econ. 135(2), 505–527 (2020)
Valtakoski, A.: The evolution and impact of qualitative research. J. Serv. Mark. 34(1), 8–23 (2019)
Zheng, E., et al.: When econometrics meets machine learning. Data Inf. Manag. 1(2), 75–83 (2018)
Wang, C., Chin, T., Lin, J.H.: Openness and firm innovation performance: the moderating effect of ambidextrous knowledge search strategy. J. Knowl. Manage. 24(2), 301–323 (2020)
Acknowledgement
The work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#72072087), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20200339), Shenzhen Special Fund for the Development of Strategic Emerging Industries (No. JCYJ20170818100156260), research fund of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2020YFSY0061), and Institute of Data Research in Humanities and Social Sciences at Nanjing University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, J., Kang, L., Bian, Y. (2021). How Blockchain Innovations Emerge: From the Perspective of Knowledge Search. In: Nah, F.FH., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12783. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77750-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77749-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77750-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)