Abstract
Solid eID (electronic identification) infrastructures form the backbone of today’s digital transformation. In June 2014, the European Commission adopted the eIDAS regulation (electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market) as a major initiative towards EU-wide eID interoperability; which receives massive attention in all EU member states in recent years. As a joint effort of Estonia and the Netherlands, this study provides a comparative case study on eIDAS implementation practices of the two countries. The aim was to analyze eIDAS implementation challenges of the two countries and to propose a variety of possible solutions to overcome them. During an action learning workshop in November 2019, key experts from Estonia and the Netherlands identified eIDAS implementation challenges and proposed possible solutions to the problems from the policy maker, the service provider and the user perspective. As a result, we identified five themes of common challenges: compliance issues, interpretation problems, different practices in member states, cooperation and collaboration barriers, and representation of legal persons. Proposed solutions do not only involve changes in the eIDAS regulation, but different actions to develop an eIDAS framework and to improve cross-border service provision - which has recently become an important topic among member states. Eventually, the study provides practical input to the ongoing eIDAS review process and can help member states to overcome eIDAS implementation challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
According to eIDAS, an eID scheme is a system for electronic identification under which electronic identification means are issued to natural or legal persons (or to natural persons representing legal persons).
- 2.
Estonian eID scheme notified under eIDAS, https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/display/EIDCOMMUNITY/Estonia.
- 3.
Estonian eID statistics, https://www.id.ee/?lang=en&id=.
- 4.
Smart-ID’s recognition as Qualified Signature Creation Device (QSCD), https://www.smart-id.com/e-service-providers/smart-id-as-a-qscd/.
- 5.
Estonian eID statistics, https://www.id.ee/?lang=en&id=.
- 6.
The Netherlands (DTF/eHerkenning) eID scheme notified under eIDAS, https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74091935.
- 7.
Dutch Trust framework for Electronic Identification, https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=74091935.
- 8.
The Netherlands (DigiD) scheme pre-notified under eIDAS, https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=176620999.
- 9.
Digicampus homepage, https://www.dedigicampus.nl/.
References
Vial, G.: Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 28(2), 118–144 (2019)
Khatchatourov, A., Laurent, M., Levallois-Barth, C.: Privacy in digital identity systems: models, assessment, and user adoption. In: Tambouris, E., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2015. LNCS, vol. 9248, pp. 273–290. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22479-4_21
Pappel, I., Pappel, I., Tepandi, J., Draheim, D.: Systematic digital signing in estonian e-government processes. In: Hameurlain, A., Küng, J., Wagner, R., Dang, T.K., Thoai, N. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXXVI. LNCS, vol. 10720, pp. 31–51. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56266-6_2
European Parliament and Council: EU Parliament and Council regulation (EU) No 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing directive 1999/93/EC (2014)
The European Parliament: EU Parliament Resolution. Towards a Digital Single Market Act (2015/2147(INI) (2016)
European Parliament and Council: EU Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No 2018/1724 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 (2018)
Bhattarai, R., Pappel, I., Vainsalu, H., Yahia, S.B., Draheim, D.: The impact of the single digital gateway regulation from the citizens’ perspective. Procedia Comput. Sci. 164, 159–167 (2019)
Bharosa, N., Lips, S., Draheim, D.: Making e-government work: learning from the Netherlands and Estonia. In: Hofmann, S., Csáki, C., Edelmann, N., Lampoltshammer, T., Melin, U., Parycek, P., Schwabe, G., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2020. LNCS, vol. 12220, pp. 41–53. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58141-1_4
Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2011)
Revans, R.W.: ABC of Action Learning. Gower Publishing, Ltd., Farnham (2011)
Berbecaru, D., Lioy, A., Cameroni, C.: Electronic identification for universities: building cross-border services based on the eIDAS infrastructure. Information 10(6), 210 (2019)
Maliappis, M., Gerakos, K., Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M.: Authenticated academic services through eIDAS. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 11(3/4), 386 (2019)
Klobučar, T.: Improving cross-border educational services with eIDAS. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds.) WorldCIST’19 2019. AISC, vol. 931, pp. 932–938. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16184-2_88
Berbecaru, D., Lioy, A., Cameroni, C.: Providing digital identity and academic attributes through European eID infrastructures: results achieved, limitations, and future steps. Softw. Pract. Exp. 49(11), 1643–1662 (2019)
Gerakos, K., Maliappis, M., Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M.: Electronic authentication for university transactions using eIDAS. In: Katsikas, S.K., Zorkadis, V. (eds.) e-Democracy 2017. CCIS, vol. 792, pp. 187–195. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71117-1_13
Vogt, T.: Die neue eIDAS-verordnung – chance und herausforderung für die öffentliche verwaltung in deutschland. Inf. Wissenschaft Praxis 67(1), 61–68 (2016)
Tsakalakis, N., OHara, K., Stalla-Bourdillon, S.: Identity assurance in the UK. In: Proceedings of WebSci 16 - The 8th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM Press (2016)
Pelikánová, R.M., Cvik, E.D., MacGregor, R.: Qualified electronic signature – eIDAS striking czech public sector bodies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 67(6), 1551–1560 (2019)
Engelbertz, N., Erinola, N., Herring, D., Somorovsky, J., Mladenov, V., Schwenk, J.: Security analysis of eidas – the cross-country authentication scheme in europe. In: 12th USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies (WOOT 2018). USENIX Association, Baltimore, MD, August 2018
Kutyłowski, M., Hanzlik, L., Kluczniak, K.: Pseudonymous signature on eIDAS token – implementation based privacy threats. In: Liu, J.K., Steinfeld, R. (eds.) ACISP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9723, pp. 467–477. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40367-0_31
Tsakalakis, N., Stalla-Bourdillon, S., O’Hara, K.: Data protection by design for cross-border electronic identification: does the eIDAS interoperability framework need to be modernised? In: Kosta, E., Pierson, J., Slamanig, D., Fischer-Hübner, S., Krenn, S. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2018. IAICT, vol. 547, pp. 255–274. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16744-8_17
Mocanu, S., Chiriac, A.M., Popa, C., Dobrescu, R., Saru, D.: Identification and trust techniques compatible with eIDAS regulation. In: Li, J., Liu, Z., Peng, H. (eds.) SPNCE 2019. LNICST, vol. 284, pp. 656–665. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21373-2_55
Lips, S., Pappel, I., Tsap, V., Draheim, D.: Key factors in coping with large-scale security vulnerabilities in the eID field. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11032, pp. 60–70. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98349-3_5
Lips, S., Aas, K., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Designing an effective long-term identity management strategy for a mature e-state. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) EGOVIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11709, pp. 221–234. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_16
Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Factors affecting e-ID public acceptance: a literature review. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) EGOVIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11709, pp. 176–188. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_13
Tsap, V., Pappel, I., Draheim, D.: Key success factors in introducing national e-identification systems. In: Dang, T.K., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E.J. (eds.) FDSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10646, pp. 455–471. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70004-5_33
Roelofs, F.: Analysis and comparison of identification and authentication systems under the eIDAS regulation. Master’s thesis, Radboud University, the Netherlands (2019)
Pedler, M.: Action Learning in Practice. Gower Publishing, Farnham (2011)
Zuber-Skerritt, O.: Action learning and action research: paradigm, praxis and programs. In: Effective Change Management Through Action Research and Action Learning: Concepts, Perspectives, Processes and Applications, vol. 1, p. 20 (2001)
Aldred, R.: From community participation to organizational therapy? World cafe and appreciative inquiry as research methods. Commun. Dev. J. 46, 57–71 (2009)
Wimmer, M.A., Tambouris, E., Krimmer, R., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Chatfield, A.T.: Once only principle. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lips, S., Bharosa, N., Draheim, D. (2020). eIDAS Implementation Challenges: The Case of Estonia and the Netherlands. In: Chugunov, A., Khodachek, I., Misnikov, Y., Trutnev, D. (eds) Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. EGOSE 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1349. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67238-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67238-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67237-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67238-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)