Port-City Shared Areas to Improve Freight Transport Sustainability | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Port-City Shared Areas to Improve Freight Transport Sustainability

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (ICCSA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12255))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to propose a methodological framework to evaluate the reuse of areas located close to the port as “retro-port”, in order to reduce the externalities caused by Ro-Ro freight terminal operation and the burden of freight deliveries in urban areas. In this regard, an analysis of the main variables involved in this process is presented, with reference to terminal traffic, terminal capacity, accessibility to the port and freight handling infrastructures. The results of this research constitute the base to support and improve urban logistics activities, rethinking the use of elements and areas that characterize the port and its surroundings. These findings pave the way for further research related to the design and dimensioning of retro-port and the realistic implementation of an urban consolidation centre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Viana, M., et al.: Impact of maritime transport emissions on coastal air quality in Europe. Atmosph. Environ. 90, 96–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Cocuzza, E., Torrisi, V.: Framework for the evaluation of the quality of pedestrian routes for the sustainability of port-city shared areas. In: Coastal Cities and their Sustainable Future III, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, vol. 188. WIT Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.2495/cc190021. ISSN 1743-3509

  3. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Torrisi, V., Cocuzza, E.: Sustainability of freight transport through an integrated approach: the case of the eastern sicily port system. Transp. Res. Procedia 45, 177–184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yeo, G.T., Thai, V.V., Roh, S.Y.: An analysis of port service quality and customer satisfaction: the case of Korean container ports. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 31(4), 437–447 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Morales Fusco, P.: Roll-on/roll-off terminals and truck freight: improving competitiveness in a motorways of the sea context (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fourgeaud, P.: Measuring port performance. The World Bank (2000). http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTPRAL/Resources/338897-1117630103824/fourgeau.pdf

  7. Unctad (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development), 2006. Review of maritime transport, 2006. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Publications. (COMPIT 2006), 8–10 May 2003 Oegsteest, The Netherlands (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bassan, S.: Evaluating seaport operation and capacity analysis—preliminary methodology. Marit. Pol. Manage. 34(1), 3–19 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballis, A.: Introducing level-of-service standards for intermodal freight terminals. Transp. Res. Rec. 1873, 79–88 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mathonnet, C.: Le project IQ ‘‘intermodal quality’’ une nouvelle approche de la qualité pour les terminaux intermodaux. Transports 400, 108–116 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Özkan, E.D., Nas, S., Güler, N.: Capacity analysis of RO-RO terminals by using simulation modeling method. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 32(3), 139–147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keceli, Y., Aksoy, S., Aydogdu, Y.: A simulation model for decision support in Ro-Ro terminal operations. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manage. 15(4), 338–358 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Iannone, R., Miranda, S., Prisco, L., Riemma, S., Sarno, D.: Proposal for a flexible discrete event simulation model for assessing the daily operation decisions in a Ro–Ro terminal. Simul. Model. Pract. Theor. 61, 28–46 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maksimavičius, R.: Some elements of the Ro-Ro terminals. Transport 19(2), 75–81 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Malavasi, G., Ricci, S.: The sea-side port capacity: a synthetic evaluation model. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 79, 471–480 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. World Bank. World Bank Seaport Toolkit, 2nd edn. World Bank, Washington USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Port of Gothenburg. https://www.portofgothenburg.com/news-room/news/construction-of-new-crossdocking-terminal-under-way-at-the-port-of-gothenburg/. Accessed 18 June 2020

  18. Port of Norrköping. https://www.scmp.com/article/1329515/nordic-and-baltic-hub-readies-cross-docking-facility-surging-trade. Accessed 18 June 2020

  19. Port of Newark. https://glenwaydistribution.com/case-study-cross-docking-storage/. Accessed 18 June 2020

  20. Port of Santos. https://www.joc.com/port-news/south-american-ports/port-santos/santos-terminal-turns-cross-docking-protect-market-share-amid-recession_20160705.html. Accessed 18 June 2020

  21. Boysen, N., Fliedner, M.: Cross dock scheduling: classification, literature review and research agenda. Omega 38(6), 413–422 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schaffer, B.: Implementing a successful crossdocking operation. IIE Solutions 29(10), 34–36 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Forte, F.: New land values patterns in the space of the Italian metropolitan areas: the case of the logistic retro-port in Naples. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 223, 503–508 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Delponte, I.: Porto-città-retroporto logistico. In: PORTUS (2007). http://retedigital.com/wp-content/themes/rete/pdfs/portus/Portus_16/Porto-citt%C3%A0-retroporto_logistico.pdf Accessed 25 Apr 2020

  25. Giuffrida, N., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Rofè, Y., Calabrò, G.: Investigating the correlation between transportation social need and accessibility: the case of Catania. Transp. Res. Procedia 27, 816–823 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Giuffrida, N., Inturri, G., Caprì, S., Spica, S., Ignaccolo, M.: The impact of a bus rapid transit line on spatial accessibility and transport equity: The case of Catania. Transport infrastructure and systems. In: Proceedings of the AIIT International Congress on Transport Infrastructure and Systems, TIS, pp. 753–758 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ignaccolo, C., Giuffrida, N., Torrisi, V.: The Queensway of New York city. A proposal for sustainable mobility in queens. In: Town and Infrastructure Planning for Safety and Urban Quality, pp. 69–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351173360-12

  28. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Pira, M.L., Torrisi, V.: Public engagement for designing new transport services: investigating citizen preferences from a multiple criteria perspective. Transp. Res. Procedia 37, 91–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Y., Cullinane, K.: Measuring container port accessibility: an application of the principal eigenvector method (PEM). Maritime Econ. Logist. 10(1–2), 75–89 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Browne, M., Sweet, M., Woodburn, A., Allen, J.: Urban Freight Consolidation Centres Final Report (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. EC. Intermodal freight terminals. In search of efficiency to support intermodality growth (2006). http://www.socool-logistics.eu/www.socoollogistics.eu/socool3/index.php/en/library/doc_download/Intermodal%20Freight%20Terminals%20-%20In%20search%20of%20efficiency%20to%20support%20intermodality%20growth.pdf_%3B%20modification-date%3D_Fri%2C%2014%20Dec%202012%2011_29_13%20%2B0100_%3B%20size%3D1629735%3B. Accessed 23 Apr 2020

  32. Stojaković, M., Twrdy, E.: A decision support tool for container terminal optimization within the berth subsystem. Transport 31(1), 29–40 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morales-Fusco, P., Saurí, S., Spuch, B.: Quality indicators and capacity calculation for RoRo terminals. Transp. Plann. Technol. 33(8), 695–717 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Todorov, M.: RoRo Handbook: A Practical Guide to Roll-On Roll-off Cargo Ships, 1st edn. Schiffer publishing, Atglen (2016). ISBN: 978-0-7643-5123-5

    Google Scholar 

  35. Janievic, M., Kaminsky, P., Ndiaye, A.B.: Downscaling the consolidation of goods-state of the art and transferability of micro-consolidation initiatives. In: European Transport – Trasporti Europei, pp. 1–23 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lagorio, A., Pinto, R., Golini, R.: Research in urban logistics: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. 46, 908–931 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gammelegaard, B., Andersen, C.B.G., Aastrup, J.: Value co-creation in the interface between city logistics provider and in-store processes. Transp. Res. Procedia 12, 787–799 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G.: Innovative transport systems to promote sustainable mobility: developing the model architecture of a traffic control and supervisor system. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2018. LNCS, vol. 10962, pp. 622–638. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95168-3_42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G.: Toward a sustainable mobility through a dynamic real-time traffic monitoring, estimation and forecasting system: the RE.S.E.T. project. In: Town and Infrastructure Planning for Safety and Urban Quality, pp. 241–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351173360-32

  40. Canale, A., Tesoriere, G., Campisi, T.: The MAAS development as a mobility solution based on the individual needs of transport users. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2186, no. 1, p. 160005. AIP Publishing LLC, December 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5138073

  41. Browne, M., Woodburn, A., Alle, J.: Evaluating the potential for urban consolidation centres. Eur. Transp. Trasporti Europei 35, 46–63 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Van Rooijen, T., Quak, H.: Local impacts of a new urban consolidation centre – the case of Binnenstadservice.nl. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 5967–5979 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Calabrò, G., Torrisi, V., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M.: Improving inbound logistic planning for large-scale real-world routing problems: a novel ant-colony simulation-based optimization. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 12(1) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00409-7

  44. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Torrisi, V.: Structuring transport decision-making problems through stakeholder engagement: the case of Catania metro accessibility. Transp. Infrastruct. Syst. 919–926 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315281896-118

  45. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Torrisi, V., Calabrò, G.: A step towards walkable environments: spatial analysis of pedestrian compatibility in an urban context. Eur. Transp. Trasporti Europei 76(6), 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Moslem, S., Duleba, S.: Sustainable urban transport development by applying a fuzzy-AHP model: a case study from Mersin, Turkey. Urban Sci. 3(2), 55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Campisi, T., Canale, A., Tesoriere, G.: SWOT analysis for the implementation of spaces and pedestrian paths at the street markets of Palermo. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2040, no. 1, p. 140003. AIP Publishing LLC, November 2018. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5079192

  48. Campisi, T., Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Tesoriere, G.: University propensity assessment to car sharing services using mixed survey data: the Italian case study of Enna city. Transp. Res. Procedia 47, 433–440 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Quak, H., Tavasszy, L.: Customized solutions for sustainable city logistics: the viability of urban freight consolidation centres. In: van Nunen, J., Huijbregts, P., Rietveld, P. (eds.) Transitions Towards Sustainable Mobility, pp. 213–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21192-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N.: Combining sensor traffic and simulation data to measure urban road network reliability. In: International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering (ICTTE) Proceedings, Belgrade, p. 1004, November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  51. Macedo, E., Tomás, R., Fernandes, P., Coelho, M.C., Bandeira, J.M.: Quantifying road traffic emissions embedded in a multi-objective traffic assignment model. Transp. Res. Procedia 47, 648–655 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., García-Melón, M., Giuffrida, N., Le Pira, M., Torrisi, V.: Combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with role-playing games for stakeholder engagement in complex transport decisions. Transp. Res. Procedia 27, 500–507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G.: Estimating travel time reliability in urban areas through a dynamic simulation model. Transp. Res. Procedia 27, 857–864 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Torrisi, V., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G.: Analysis of road urban transport network capacity through a dynamic assignment model: validation of different measurement methods. Transp. Res. Procedia 27, 1026–1033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Torrisi, V.: Investigating scenarios for freight traffic in the Eastern Sicily port system. In: Presented at the 18th International Conference on Transport Science - ICTS 2018 - Maritime, Transport And Logistics Science - Conference proceedings, pp. 139–145 (2018). ISBN 978-961-7041-03-3

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Giuffrida, N., Torrisi, V.: A sustainable framework for the analysis of port systems. Eur. Transp. Int. J. Transp. Econ. Eng. Law (78) (2020). Article no. 7. ISSN 1825-3997

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially financed by the University of Catania within the project “Piano della Ricerca Dipartimentale 2016–2018” of the Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture and the project “Piano per la Ricerca 2016–2018 - Linea di intervento 2” of the Department of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering. The work has been partially financed by the project “THALASSA – Technology and materials for safe low consumption and low life cycle cost vessels and crafts” (unique project code CUP B46C18000720005) under the Italian research programme “PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020”. This study was also supported by the MIUR (Ministry of Education, Universities and Research [Italy]) through a project entitled WEAKI TRANSIT: WEAK-demand areas Innovative TRANsport Shared services for Italian Towns (Project code: 20174ARRHT CUP Code: F74I19001290001), financed with the PRIN 2017 (Research Projects of National Relevance) programme. We authorize the MIUR to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notations thereon. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MIUR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 64, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Nadia Giuffrida, Matteo Ignaccolo & Vincenza Torrisi

  2. Department of Electric, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 64, 95123, Catania, Italy

    Giuseppe Inturri

Authors
  1. Nadia Giuffrida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matteo Ignaccolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Giuseppe Inturri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vincenza Torrisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nadia Giuffrida or Vincenza Torrisi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Chair- Center of ICT/ICE, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Chiara Garau

  5. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Ivan Blečić

  6. Clayton School of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  7. Department of Information Science, Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  8. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A. C. Rocha

  9. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo Maria Torre

  11. Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

    Yeliz Karaca

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Giuffrida, N., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G., Torrisi, V. (2020). Port-City Shared Areas to Improve Freight Transport Sustainability. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020. ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58819-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58820-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation