Simplified Approach for Liquefaction Risk Assessment of Transportation Systems: Preliminary Outcomes | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Simplified Approach for Liquefaction Risk Assessment of Transportation Systems: Preliminary Outcomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (ICCSA 2020)

Abstract

In the present study, a strategy to assess liquefaction risk of road infrastructures has been proposed, as combination of liquefaction hazard, infrastructures vulnerability and exposure of transportation network. The proposed methodology includes a capacity analysis of the road network performed on both pre- and post-liquefaction scenarios to evaluate the social cost in terms of delay cost suffered by the transportation system. The approach has been applied to the municipality of Terre del Reno (Italy), that in 2012 suffered a severe seismic sequence that induced extensive liquefaction evidences over the territory. A multi-layer database, on a Geographical Information Systems (GIS) platform, has been created, with the aim to overlap information about subsoil, earthquake intensity, groundwater depth and road network configuration. The Vulnerability of road has been evaluated by the settlements of embankment on liquefied soils and, according to the damage level occurred, a loss of functionality has been assigned. Finally, performing a transportation analysis, the effects on the traffic conditions have been evaluated in terms of Total Delay Cost, suffer by the road users. Preliminary results showed a redistribution of the traffic flows caused by the service loss of crucial road sections due to the liquefaction evidences on the transportation network and the related Total Delay Cost has been quantified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation & Development. Recommendation after the Canterbury Earthquake sequence (2010–2011) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Indirizzi e Criteri per la Microzonazione Sismica. Dipartimento della Protezione Civile (2017): Linee guida per la gestione del territorio in aree interessate da liquefazioni (LQ). Versione 1.0 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. All-Hazard Guide for Transport Infrastructure. © Copyright 2013 – 2015. The AllTraIn Consorsium. http://www.alltrain-project.eu/

  4. STRIT project Homepage. http://www.stress-scarl.com/it/innovazione/i-progetti-nazionali/strit.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020

  5. Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model HAZUS®MH MR4 Technical Manual. National Institute of Building Sciences. (NIBS). Washington, DC. (2004). http://www.fema.gov/hazus/

  6. Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain. ISBN: 978-92-79-33135-0 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2788/23242. http://www.vce.at/SYNER-G/files/project/proj-overview.html

  7. Molarius, R., et al.: Systemic vulnerability and resilience analysis of electric and transport network failure in cases of extreme winter storms. In: Beer, M., Au, S.-K., Hall, J.W. (Eds.). Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Quantification, Mitigation, and Management, pp. 608–617. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. SECURITY MANUAL FOR EUROPEAN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. www.secman-project.eu. Copyright: SecMan Consortium (2013)

  9. Deliverable D400: Importance of the structures for the traffic network. © Copyright 2009 – 2012. The SeRoN Consortium (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Seville, E., Nicholson, A.: Risk and impact of natural hazards on a road network. J. Transp. Eng. - ASCE 127(2), 159 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-947x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Werner, S.D., et al.: Redars 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems. Special Report MCEER-06-SP08. Federal Highway Administration (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chang, L.: Transportation system modeling and applications in earthquake engineering. Doctoral Thesis in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karamitros, D.K., Bouckovalas, G.D., Chaloulos, Y.K.: Seismic settlements of shallow foundations on liquefiable soil with a clay crust. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 46, 64–76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Modoni, G., Spacagna, R.L., Paolella, L., Salvatore, E., Rasulo, A., Martelli, L.: Liquefaction risk assessment: lesson learned from a case study. In: Proceedings of the VI International Conference of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Rome (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. SYNER-G: typology definition and fragility functions for physical elements at seismic risk (2014). ISBN 978-94-007-7871-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7872-6

  16. Cascetta, E.: Transportation Systems Analysis. Models and Applications, 2nd edn., pp. 1–752. Springer Verlag (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75857-2

  17. Fioravante, V., et al.: Earthquake geotechnical engineering aspects: the 2012 Emilia Romagna earthquake (Italy). In: Seventh International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, April 29th–May 4th 2013, Chicago, US (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Italian Institute of Statistic (ISTAT). https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/139381. Accessed 16 Feb 2020

  19. Spacagna, R.L., Rasulo, A., Modoni, G.: Geostatistical analysis of settlements induced by groundwater extraction. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10407, pp. 350–364. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution by the EU funded project LIQUEFACT “Assessment and mitigation of liquefaction potential across Europe: a holistic approach to protect structures/infrastructures for improved resilience to earthquake-induced liquefaction disasters”, project ID 700748 funded under the H2020-DRS-2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Santilli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

D’Apuzzo, M. et al. (2020). Simplified Approach for Liquefaction Risk Assessment of Transportation Systems: Preliminary Outcomes. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020. ICCSA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12255. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58819-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58820-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics