Research on Chain of Evidence Based on Knowledge Graph | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Research on Chain of Evidence Based on Knowledge Graph

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Security (ICAIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12240))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1379 Accesses

Abstract

Evidence plays an extremely important role in legal proceedings, historical research, and diplomatic disputes. In recent years, more and more evidence data has been presented in the form of electronic data. Therefore, the extraction, organization, and validation of knowledge in electronic evidence also seem more and more important. In order to effectively organize the evidence data and construct the Chain of Evidence that can meet the practical needs, this paper uses Knowledge Graph based method to conduct relevance of evidence research. Firstly, through Knowledge Extraction, Knowledge Fusion, Knowledge Reasoning, the evidence data Knowledge Graph is constructed. After that, the Chain of Evidence will be built through evidence correlation and evidence influence evaluation, and finally different forms of knowledge presentation are carried out for different users. In this paper, the work and process of evidence chain association based on knowledge map are introduced, and the possible research direction in the future is prospected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yih, S.W., Chang, M.W., He, X., et al.: Semantic parsing via staged query graph generation: question answering with knowledge base (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blanco, R., Boldi, P., Marino, A.: Using graph distances for named-entity linking. Sci. Comput. Program. 130, 24–36 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Sun, M., et al.: Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ji, G., Liu, K., He, S., et al.: Knowledge graph completion with adaptive sparse transfer matrix. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Farber, D.: Microsoft’s Bing Seeks Enlightenment with Satori. Cnet. CBS Interactive Inc. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khan, Z.C., Mashiane, T.: An analysis of Facebook’s graph search. In: 2014 Information Security for South Africa, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, C., Ma, X., Chen, J., et al.: Information extraction and knowledge graph construction from geoscience literature. Comput. Geosci. 112, 112–120 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rospocher, M., van Erp, M., Vossen, P., et al.: Building event-centric knowledge graphs from news. J. Web Semant. 37, 132–151 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bordes, A., Gabrilovich, E.: Constructing and mining web-scale knowledge graphs: KDD 2014 tutorial. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, p. 1967. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Niu, B., Huang, Y.: An improved method for web text affective cognition computing based on knowledge graph. CMC-Comput. Mater. Continua 59(1), 1–14 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Panesar-Walawege, R.K., Sabetzadeh, M., Briand, L., et al.: Characterizing the chain of evidence for software safety cases: a conceptual model based on the IEC 61508 standard. In: 2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, pp. 335–344. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahmad, A.: The forensic chain of evidence model: improving the process of evidence collection in incident handling procedures. In: The 6th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hayes, F., Spurgeon, D.J., Lofts, S., et al.: Evidence-based logic chains demonstrate multiple impacts of trace metals on ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manag. 223, 150–164 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cosic, J., Cosic, G., Ćosić, J., et al.: Chain of custody and life cycle of digital evidence. Comput. Technol. Appl. 3, 126–129 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alobaidi, M., Malik, K.M., Hussain, M.: Automated ontology generation framework powered by linked biomedical ontologies for disease-drug domain. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 165, 117–128 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bravo, M., Reyes-Ortiz, J.A., Cruz-Ruiz, I., et al.: Ontology for academic context reasoning. Procedia Comput. Sci. 141, 175–182 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, M., Chen, Y., Liu, M., et al.: A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 18(5), 601–606 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lei, J., Tang, B., Lu, X., et al.: A comprehensive study of named entity recognition in Chinese clinical text. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 21(5), 808–814 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., et al.: Neural architectures for named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 260–270 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ma, X., Hovy, E.: End-to-end sequence labeling via bi-directional LSTM-CNNs-CRF. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01354 (2016)

  21. Cifariello, P., Ferragina, P., Ponza, M.: Wiser: a semantic approach for expert finding in academia based on entity linking. Inf. Syst. 82, 1–16 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, D., Wang, J.: An approach on Chinese microblog entity linking combining baidu encyclopaedia and word2vec. Procedia Comput. Sci. 111, 37–45 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hobbs, J.R.: Resolving pronoun references. Lingua 44(4), 311–338 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Denis, P., Baldridge, J.: Joint determination of anaphoricity and coreference resolution using integer programming. In: Human Language Technologies 2007: The Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics; Proceedings of the Main Conference, pp. 236–243 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu, W., Meng, F., Wang, S., et al.: Graph-based chinese word sense disambiguation with multi-knowledge integration. Comput. Mater. Continua 61(1), 197–212 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie, R., Liu, Z., Jia, J., et al.: Representation learning of knowledge graphs with entity descriptions. In: Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, K., Tan, T., Zhang, W.: An evidence combination method based on DBSCAN clustering. Comput. Mater. Continua 57(2), 269–281 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grover, A., Leskovec, J.: node2vec: scalable feature learning for networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 855–864. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Shi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Y., Shi, J., Han, J., Lu, M. (2020). Research on Chain of Evidence Based on Knowledge Graph. In: Sun, X., Wang, J., Bertino, E. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Security. ICAIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12240. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57881-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57881-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57880-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57881-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics