Balanced Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Balanced Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantum Interaction (QI 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11690))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Clues from psychology indicate that human cognition is not only based on classical probability theory as explained by Kolmogorov’s axioms but additionally on quantum probability. We explore the relation between the law of total probability and its violation resulting in the law of total quantum probability. The violation results from an additional interference that influences the classical probabilities. Outgoing from this exploration we introduce a balanced Bayesian quantum-like model that is based on probability waves. The law of maximum uncertainty indicates how to choose a possible phase value of the wave resulting in a meaningful probability value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amico, L., Fazio, R., Osterloh, A., Vedral, V.: Entanglement in many-body systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80(2), 517–576 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Binney, J., Skinner, D.: The Physics of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Busemeyer, J., Matthew, M., Wang, Z.: A quantum information processing explanation of disjunction effects. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 131–135 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Busemeyer, J., Wang, Z.: Quantum cognition: key issues and discussion. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6, 43–46 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Busemeyer, J.R., Trueblood, J.: Comparison of quantum and Bayesian inference models. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5494, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00834-4_5

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Empirical comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making. J. Math. Psychol. 53(5), 423–433 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.03.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.T.: Quantum dynamics of human decision-making. J. Math. Psychol. 50(3), 220–241 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2006.01.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, S., Rosenbaum, T.F., Aeppli, G., Coppersmith, S.N.: Entangled quantum state of magnetic dipoles. Nature 425, 48–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hristova, E., Grinberg, M.: Disjunction effect in prisonner’s dilemma: evidences from an eye-tracking study. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1225–1230 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. Ser. II 106(4), 620–630 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaynes, E.T.: Information theory and statistical mechanics II. Phys. Rev. Ser. II 108(2), 171–190 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jaynes, E.T.: Prior probabilities. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. 4(3), 227–241 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing. J. BioSyst. 95, 179–187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuhberger, A., Komunska, D., Josef, P.: The disjunction effect: does it exist for two-step gambles? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 85, 250–264 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambdin, C., Burdsal, C.: The disjunction effect reexamined: relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 103, 268–276 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, S., Taplin, J.: Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in prisoner’s dilemma game. Chin. J. Psychol. 44, 25–46 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moreira, C., Wichert, A.: Quantum-like Bayesian networks for modeling decision making. Front. Psychol. 7, 11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shafir, E., Tversky, A.: Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 449–474 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tversky, A., Shafir, E.: The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. J. Psychol. Sci. 3, 305–309 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vedral, V.: Living in a quantum world. Sci. Am. 304(6), 38–43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yukalov, V., Sornette, D.: Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement. Theor. Decis. 70, 283–328 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, INESC-ID and Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Porto Salvo, Portugal

    Andreas Wichert & Catarina Moreira

  2. School of Business, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK

    Andreas Wichert & Catarina Moreira

Authors
  1. Andreas Wichert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Catarina Moreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Wichert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Bob Coecke

  2. Paris School of Economics, Paris, France

    Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wichert, A., Moreira, C. (2019). Balanced Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making. In: Coecke, B., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11690. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35895-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35895-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35894-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35895-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation