Abstract
Video is frequently used as a learning medium in a variety of educational settings, including large online courses as well as informal learning scenarios. To foster learner engagement around instructional videos, our learning scenario facilitates interactive note taking and commenting similar to popular social video-sharing platforms. This approach has recently been enriched by introducing nudging mechanisms, which raises questions about ensuing learning effects. To better understand the nature of these effects, we take a closer look at the content of the comments. Our study is based on an ex post analysis of a larger data set from a recent study. As a first step of analysis, video comments are clustered based on a feature set that captures the temporal and semantic alignment of comments with the videos. Based on the ensuing typology of comments, learners are characterized through the types of comments that they have contributed. The results will allow for a better targeting of nudges to improve video-based learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawal, A., Venkatraman, J., Leonard, S., Paepcke, A.: YouEDU: addressing confusion in MOOC discussion forums by recommending instructional video clips (2015)
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Engaging with massive online courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 687–698. ACM (2014)
Atapattu, T., Falkner, K.: Impact of lecturer’s discourse for student video interactions: video learning analytics case study of MOOCs. J. Learn. Anal. 5(3), 182–197 (2018)
Baker, R.S.J., Mitrović, A., Mathews, M.: Detecting gaming the system in constraint-based tutors. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 267–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13470-8_25
Bixler, R., D’Mello, S.: Automatic gaze-based user-independent detection of mind wandering during computerized reading. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 26(1), 33–68 (2016)
Brooks, C., Thompson, C., Teasley, S.: A time series interaction analysis method for building predictive models of learners using log data. In: Proceedings of 5th Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 126–135. ACM (2015)
Chatti, M.A., et al.: Video annotation and analytics in coursemapper. Smart Learn. Environ. 3(1), 10 (2016)
Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)
Cocea, M., Weibelzahl, S.: Disengagement detection in online learning: validation studies and perspectives. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 4(2), 114–124 (2011)
Daems, O., Erkens, M., Malzahn, N., Hoppe, H.U.: Using content analysis and domain ontologies to check learners’ understanding of science concepts. J. Comput. Educ. 1(2), 113–131 (2014)
Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A., Piotrkowicz, A., Lau, L., Weerasinghe, A.: Using learning analytics to devise interactive personalised nudges for active video watching. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, pp. 22–31. ACM (2017)
Drummond, J., Litman, D.: In the zone: towards detecting student zoning out using supervised machine learning. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 306–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_53
Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Chrisochoides, N.: Making sense of video analytics: lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 16(1), 260–283 (2015)
Hecking, T., Chounta, I.A., Hoppe, H.U.: Role modelling in MOOC discussion forums. J. Learn. Anal. 4(1), 85–116 (2017)
Hecking, T., Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A., Ulrich Hoppe, U.: Using network-text analysis to characterise learner engagement in active video watching. In: ICCE 2017 Main Conference Proceedings, pp. 326–335. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education (2017)
Hong, J.K., Mitrovic, A., Neshatian, K.: Predicting quitting behaviour in SQL-tutor. In: Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 37–45. APSCE (2015)
Kaltura Inc.: The state of video in education (2017)
Koedinger, K.R., Kim, J., Jia, J.Z., McLaughlin, E.A., Bier, N.L.: Learning is not a spectator sport: doing is better than watching for learning from a MOOC. In: Proceedings of 2nd ACM Conference on Learning@Scale, pp. 111–120 (2015)
Kovacs, G.: Effects of in-video quizzes on MOOC lecture viewing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 31–40. ACM (2016)
Mills, C., Bosch, N., Graesser, A., D’Mello, S.: To quit or not to quit: predicting future behavioral disengagement from reading patterns. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 19–28. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_3
Mitrovic, A., Dimitrova, V., Lau, L., Weerasinghe, A., Mathews, M.: Supporting constructive video-based learning: requirements elicitation from exploratory studies. In: André, E., Baker, R., Hu, X., Rodrigo, M.M.T., du Boulay, B. (eds.) AIED 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10331, pp. 224–237. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_19
Mitrovic, A., Gordon, M., Piotrkowicz, A., Dimitrova, V.: Investigating the effect of adding nudges to increase engagement in active video watching. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education. LNCS, pp. 320–332. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_27
Pintrich, P.R., et al.: A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). (1991)
Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)
Steinberg, D., Colla, P.: CART: classification and regression trees. Top Ten Algorithms Data Min. 9, 179 (2009)
Vail, A.K., Wiggins, J.B., Grafsgaard, J.F., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Lester, J.C.: The affective impact of tutor questions: predicting frustration and engagement. In: International Educational Data Mining Society (2016)
Wang, X., Wen, M., Rosé, C.P.: Towards triggering higher-order thinking behaviors in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 398–407. ACM (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taskin, Y., Hecking, T., Hoppe, H.U., Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A. (2019). Characterizing Comment Types and Levels of Engagement in Video-Based Learning as a Basis for Adaptive Nudging. In: Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., Schneider, J. (eds) Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies. EC-TEL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11722. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29735-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29736-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)