Learning in Twitter Streams with 280 Character Tweets | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 942))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 477 Accesses

Abstract

Social networks are a thriving source of information and applications are pervasive. Twitter has recently experienced a significant change in its essence with the doubling of the number of maximum allowed characters from 140 to 280. In this work we study the changes that come from such modification when learning systems are in place. Results on real datasets of both settings show that transferring models between both scenarios may need special treatment, as bigger tweets are harder to classify, making such dynamic environments even more challenging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.twitter.com.

  2. 2.

    https://developer.twitter.com.

References

  1. Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, October 2012

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnard, S.: Twitter: more than 140 characters. In: Palgrave Macmillan (ed.) Citizens at the Gates, Chap. 2, pp. 13–31. Springer (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, H.C.: A new perspective on Twitter hashtag use: diffusion of innovation theory. In: Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem, pp. 85:1–85:4 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Costa, J., Silva, C., Antunes, M., Ribeiro, B.: On using crowdsourcing and active learning to improve classification performance. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 469–474 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, J., Silva, C., Antunes, M., Ribeiro, B.: Defining semantic meta-hashtags for Twitter classification. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, pp. 226–235 (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, J., Thornton, K.M., Efthimiadis, E.N.: Conversational tagging in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 173–178 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joachims, T.: Learning Text Classifiers with Support Vector Machines (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, S.: How Twitter will change the way we live. Time Mag. 173, 23–32 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Rijsbergen, C.: Information Retrieval (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosell-Aguilar, F.: Twitter as a formal and informal language learning tool: from potential to evidence. In: Rosell-Aguilar, F., Tita Beaven, M.F.G. (eds.) Innovative Language Teaching and Learning at University: Integrating Informal Language into Formal Language Education, Chap. 11, pp. 99–106. Research-publishing.net (2018)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong, S., Koller, D.: Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2, 45–66 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: What’s in a hashtag? Content based prediction of the spread of ideas in microblogging communities. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 643–652 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, S., Terra, M., Warwick, C.: What do people study when they study Twitter? Classifying Twitter related academic papers. J. Doc. 69(3), 384–410 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, L., Sun, T., Zhang, M., Mei, Q.: We know what @you #tag: does the dual role affect hashtag adoption? In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 261–270 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zappavigna, M.: Ambient affiliation: a linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media Soc. 13(5), 788–806 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Costa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Costa, J., Silva, C., Ribeiro, B. (2020). Learning in Twitter Streams with 280 Character Tweets. In: Madureira, A., Abraham, A., Gandhi, N., Silva, C., Antunes, M. (eds) Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR 2018). SoCPaR 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 942. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17065-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics