Open Government Data in Kingdom of Bahrain: Towards an Effective Implementation Framework | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Open Government Data in Kingdom of Bahrain: Towards an Effective Implementation Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'19 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 930))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Governments around the world have realized the importance of Open Government Data - OGD as new paradigm shift in government that focuses on making governments more service oriented, transparent and competent. However, the situation of OGD initiative in Kingdom of Bahrain is not promising as reflected by number of assessments that measure the implementation and progress of OGD worldwide. Therefore, the current research in progress aims at investing the local situation regarding supplying OGD to the public by determine the motivations and impediments that affect government agencies’ behavior towards publishing OGD and assess the level of OGD Maturity Level in the government agencies participating in publishing open data. Second, it will investigate the local situation regarding consuming and reusing OGD in Kingdom of Bahrain by assess the level of citizen awareness towards OGD, determine citizen requirements of OGD and identify the key challenges and obstacles in using/reusing OGD. Based on the initial assessment of the available OGD measurement tools and reviewing the literature review, it have been noticed that the OGD assessment framework for Kingdom of Bahrain needs to consider both supply and demand sides, assessing OGD initiative at a local/Government Agency Level and consider quality issues of OGD: Portal, Data and Meta-data. Therefore, two questionnaires were developed: one will assess the level of OGD Maturity level (supply side), while the second will be used to investigate the demand side.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 22879
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 28599
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khouri, A.: Open data: a paradigm shift in the heart of government. J. Public Adm. Gov. 4(3), 217 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nam, T.: Challenges and concerns of open government: a case of government 3.0 in Korea. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(5), 556–570 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jung, K., Park, H.: A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea’s “Open Public Data” policy. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 353–358 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Young, A., Verhulst, S.: The Global Impact of Open Data Key Findings from Detailed Case Studies Around the World, 1st edn., p. 5. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2016). http://www.oreilly.com/data/free/the-global-impact-of-open-data.csp. Accessed 17 May 2017

  6. Zuiderwijk, A.: Open data infrastructures: the design of an infrastructure to enhance the coordination of open data use. Ph.D. thesis. Tehnische Universiteit Delft (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Opengovdata.org: The 8 Principles of Open Government Data (OpenGovData.org) (2007). https://opengovdata.org/. Accessed 18 May 2017

  9. International Open Data Charter: G8 Open Data Charter - International Open Data Charter (2013). http://opendatacharter.net/resource/g8-open-data-charter/. Accessed 18 May 2017

  10. Tauberer, J.: Open Government Data: The Book, 2nd edn. (2014). https://opengovdata.io/2014/8-principles/. Accessed 18 May 2017

  11. Open Data Barometer: Global Report (2017). http://opendatabarometer.org/3rdEdition/report/. Accessed 23 May 2017

  12. Saxena, S.: Open Public Data (OPD) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): challenges and prospects. Contemp. Arab Aff. 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alanazi, J., Chatfield, A.: Sharing government-owned data with the public: a cross-country analysis of open data practice in the middle east. In: In Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (2012). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150&context=amcis2012. Accessed 13 May 2017

  14. Elbadawi, I.: The state of open government data in GCC countries. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment, pp. 193–200. Institute of Public Governance and Management, Barcelona (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alromaih, N., Albassam, H., Al-Khalifa, H.: A proposed checklist for the technical maturity of open government data: an application on GCC countries. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services, pp. 494–499. ACM, Singapore (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Open Data Index: Open Data Index - Open Knowledge (2017). http://2015.index.okfn.org/place/bahrain/. Accessed 1 May 2017

  17. Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities’ ecosystems. Cities 64, 47–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smartdubai.ae: Smart Dubai (2017). http://www.smartdubai.ae/dubai_data.php. Accessed 13 May 2017

  19. Srinivasan, P.: The GovLab Index: Open Data - 2016 Edition - The Governance Lab @ NYU (2017). The Governance Lab @ NYU. http://thegovlab.org/govlab-index-on-open-data-2016-edition/. Accessed 13 May 2017

  20. Martin, E., Begany, G.: Opening government health data to the public: benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from early innovators. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(2), 345–351 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zuiderwijk, A., Susha, I., Charalabidis, Y., Parycek, P., Janssen, M.: Open data disclosure and use: critical factors from a case study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. Donau-Universität Krems, pp. 197–208 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hardy, K., Maurushat, A.: Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 33(1), 32–33 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pereira, G., Macadar, M., Luciano, E., Testa, M.: Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Inf. Syst. Frontiers 19(2), 213–229 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gagliardi, D., Schina, L., Sarcinella, M., Mangialardi, G., Niglia, F., Corallo, A.: Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 153–166 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Alibaks, R.: Socio-technical impediments of Open Data. Electron. J. e-Gov. 10(2), 156–172 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Conradie, P., Choenni, S.: On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, S10–S17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Strover, S.: Open government data intermediaries: a terminology framework. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brugger, J., Fraefel, M., Riedl, R., Fehr, H., Schoeneck, D., Weissbrod, C.S.: Current barriers to open government data use and visualization by political intermediaries. In: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CEDEM), Krems, pp. 219–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/cedem.2016.18

  29. Chorly, K.: The challenges presented to records management by open government data in the public sector in England: a case study. Rec. Manag. J. 27(2), 149–158 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, C.: Barriers to the open government data agenda: taking a multi-level perspective. Policy Internet 6(3), 217–240 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. de Rosnay, M.D., Janssen, K.: Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: towards common policy solutions. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(3), 1–14 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Verhulst, S., Noveck, B., Caplan, R., Brown, K., Paz, C.: The open data era in health and social care: a blueprint for the National Health Service (NHS England) to develop a research and learning programme for the open data era in health and social care, 1st edn. The GOVLAB - New York University, New York (2014). http://thegovlab.org/nhs/. Accessed 23 May 2017

  33. Dodds, L., Newman, A.: A guide to the open data maturity model: assessing your data publishing and use, 1st edn. Open Data Institute, London (2015). https://theodi.org/guides/maturity-model. Accessed 23 May 2017

  34. Solar, M., Concha, G., Meijueiro, L.: A model to assess open government data in public agencies. In: 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government, pp. 210–221. Springer, Kristiansand (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Carrara, W., Nieuwenhuis, M., Vollers, H.: Open Data Maturity in Europe 2016: Insights into the European State of Play, 1st edn. Capgemini Consulting (2016). https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/edp_landscaping_insight_report_n2_2016.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017

  36. Máchová, R., Lnenicka, M.: Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 12(1), 21–41 (2017). http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/jtaer/v12n1/art03.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. worldbank.org: Readiness Assessment Tool (2017). http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/odra.html. Accessed 23 May 2017

  38. Open Data Certificate: ODI Open Data Certificate (2017). https://certificates.theodi.org/en/. Accessed 23 May 2017

  39. Global Open Data Index: Place Overview - Global Open Data Index (2017). https://index.okfn.org/. Accessed 23 May 2017

  40. UN E-Government Knowledge Database: UN E-Government Survey 2016 (2017). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016. Accessed 23 May 2017

  41. Open Data 500: Open Data 500 (2017). http://www.opendata500.com/. Accessed 23 May 2017

  42. Caplan, R., Davies, T., Wadud, A., Verhulst, S., Alonso, J., Farhan, H.: Towards common methods for assessing open data: workshop report & draft framework, 1st edn. Open Data Research Network, New York (2014). http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Common%20Assessment%20Workshop%20Report.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sayogo, D., Pardo, T., Cook, M.: A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, Waikoloa (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.240. Accessed 23 May 2017

  44. Yang, T., Lo, J., Wang, H., Shiang, J.: Open data development and value-added government information: case studies of Taiwan E-government. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 238–241. ACM, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591932. Accessed 23 May 2017

  45. Sieber, R., Johnson, P.: Civic open data at a crossroads: dominant models and current challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 308–315 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Susha, I., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Gronlund, A.: Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption: usage, limitations, and lessons learned. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(5), 613–630 (2014). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0894439314560852. Accessed 7 Apr. 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Donker, F., Loenen, B.: How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? Int. J. Digit. Earth 10(3), 284–306 (2016). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938?needAccess=true. Accessed 9 Apr. 2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shekhar, S., Padmanabhan, V.: How to apply assessment tools for shaping successful public sector open data initiatives. Open Data Institute, London (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dawes, S.; Vidiasova, L., Trutnev, D.: Approach to assessing open government data program: comparison of common traits and differences at global context. In: EGOSE 2015 Processing of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, Russian Federation, 24–25 November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  50. Verhulst, S.: How to advance open data research: towards an understanding of demand, users and key data. WWW Foundation press release, GovLab, posted on 15 September 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 15–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Veljković, N., Bogdanovic-Dinic, S., Stoimenov, L.: Benchmarking open government: an open data perspective. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(2), 278–290 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Styrin, E., Luna-Reyes, L., Harrison, T.: Open data ecosystems: an international comparison. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 11(1), 132–156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2017-0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Srimuang, C., Cooharojananone, N., Tanlamai, U., Chandrachai, A.: Open government data assessment model: an indicator development in Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp. 341–347 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Belhiah, M., Bounabat, B.: A user-centered model for assessing and improving open government data quality. In: MIT International Conference on Information Quality, UA Little Rock, USA, 6–7 October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  56. Vetro, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Minotas, C.O., Iemma, R., Morando, F.: Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to Open Government Data. Gov. Inf. Q. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001

  57. Wirtz, B., Weyerer, J., Rӧsch, M.: Citizen and open government: an empirical analysis of antecedents of open government data. Int. J. Public Adm. 1–13 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ohemeng, F., Ofosu-Adarkwa, K.: One way traffic: the open data initiative project and the need for an effective demand side initiative in Ghana. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 419–428 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdull-Kareem Katbi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Katbi, AK., Al-Ammary, J. (2019). Open Government Data in Kingdom of Bahrain: Towards an Effective Implementation Framework. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'19 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 930. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_66

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics