Abstract
Governments around the world have realized the importance of Open Government Data - OGD as new paradigm shift in government that focuses on making governments more service oriented, transparent and competent. However, the situation of OGD initiative in Kingdom of Bahrain is not promising as reflected by number of assessments that measure the implementation and progress of OGD worldwide. Therefore, the current research in progress aims at investing the local situation regarding supplying OGD to the public by determine the motivations and impediments that affect government agencies’ behavior towards publishing OGD and assess the level of OGD Maturity Level in the government agencies participating in publishing open data. Second, it will investigate the local situation regarding consuming and reusing OGD in Kingdom of Bahrain by assess the level of citizen awareness towards OGD, determine citizen requirements of OGD and identify the key challenges and obstacles in using/reusing OGD. Based on the initial assessment of the available OGD measurement tools and reviewing the literature review, it have been noticed that the OGD assessment framework for Kingdom of Bahrain needs to consider both supply and demand sides, assessing OGD initiative at a local/Government Agency Level and consider quality issues of OGD: Portal, Data and Meta-data. Therefore, two questionnaires were developed: one will assess the level of OGD Maturity level (supply side), while the second will be used to investigate the demand side.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Khouri, A.: Open data: a paradigm shift in the heart of government. J. Public Adm. Gov. 4(3), 217 (2014)
Nam, T.: Challenges and concerns of open government: a case of government 3.0 in Korea. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(5), 556–570 (2014)
Jung, K., Park, H.: A semantic (TRIZ) network analysis of South Korea’s “Open Public Data” policy. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 353–358 (2015)
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)
Young, A., Verhulst, S.: The Global Impact of Open Data Key Findings from Detailed Case Studies Around the World, 1st edn., p. 5. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2016). http://www.oreilly.com/data/free/the-global-impact-of-open-data.csp. Accessed 17 May 2017
Zuiderwijk, A.: Open data infrastructures: the design of an infrastructure to enhance the coordination of open data use. Ph.D. thesis. Tehnische Universiteit Delft (2015)
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)
Opengovdata.org: The 8 Principles of Open Government Data (OpenGovData.org) (2007). https://opengovdata.org/. Accessed 18 May 2017
International Open Data Charter: G8 Open Data Charter - International Open Data Charter (2013). http://opendatacharter.net/resource/g8-open-data-charter/. Accessed 18 May 2017
Tauberer, J.: Open Government Data: The Book, 2nd edn. (2014). https://opengovdata.io/2014/8-principles/. Accessed 18 May 2017
Open Data Barometer: Global Report (2017). http://opendatabarometer.org/3rdEdition/report/. Accessed 23 May 2017
Saxena, S.: Open Public Data (OPD) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC): challenges and prospects. Contemp. Arab Aff. 1–13 (2017)
Alanazi, J., Chatfield, A.: Sharing government-owned data with the public: a cross-country analysis of open data practice in the middle east. In: In Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (2012). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150&context=amcis2012. Accessed 13 May 2017
Elbadawi, I.: The state of open government data in GCC countries. In: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on eGovernment, pp. 193–200. Institute of Public Governance and Management, Barcelona (2012)
Alromaih, N., Albassam, H., Al-Khalifa, H.: A proposed checklist for the technical maturity of open government data: an application on GCC countries. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services, pp. 494–499. ACM, Singapore (2016)
Open Data Index: Open Data Index - Open Knowledge (2017). http://2015.index.okfn.org/place/bahrain/. Accessed 1 May 2017
Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., De-Pablos-Heredero, C.: A model for the analysis of data-driven innovation and value generation in smart cities’ ecosystems. Cities 64, 47–53 (2017)
Smartdubai.ae: Smart Dubai (2017). http://www.smartdubai.ae/dubai_data.php. Accessed 13 May 2017
Srinivasan, P.: The GovLab Index: Open Data - 2016 Edition - The Governance Lab @ NYU (2017). The Governance Lab @ NYU. http://thegovlab.org/govlab-index-on-open-data-2016-edition/. Accessed 13 May 2017
Martin, E., Begany, G.: Opening government health data to the public: benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from early innovators. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(2), 345–351 (2016)
Zuiderwijk, A., Susha, I., Charalabidis, Y., Parycek, P., Janssen, M.: Open data disclosure and use: critical factors from a case study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government. Donau-Universität Krems, pp. 197–208 (2015)
Hardy, K., Maurushat, A.: Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 33(1), 32–33 (2017)
Pereira, G., Macadar, M., Luciano, E., Testa, M.: Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Inf. Syst. Frontiers 19(2), 213–229 (2016)
Gagliardi, D., Schina, L., Sarcinella, M., Mangialardi, G., Niglia, F., Corallo, A.: Information and communication technologies and public participation: interactive maps and value added for citizens. Gov. Inf. Q. 34(1), 153–166 (2017)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., Alibaks, R.: Socio-technical impediments of Open Data. Electron. J. e-Gov. 10(2), 156–172 (2012)
Conradie, P., Choenni, S.: On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, S10–S17 (2014)
Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C., Strover, S.: Open government data intermediaries: a terminology framework. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2013)
Brugger, J., Fraefel, M., Riedl, R., Fehr, H., Schoeneck, D., Weissbrod, C.S.: Current barriers to open government data use and visualization by political intermediaries. In: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CEDEM), Krems, pp. 219–229 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/cedem.2016.18
Chorly, K.: The challenges presented to records management by open government data in the public sector in England: a case study. Rec. Manag. J. 27(2), 149–158 (2017)
Martin, C.: Barriers to the open government data agenda: taking a multi-level perspective. Policy Internet 6(3), 217–240 (2014)
de Rosnay, M.D., Janssen, K.: Legal and institutional challenges for opening data across public sectors: towards common policy solutions. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(3), 1–14 (2014)
Verhulst, S., Noveck, B., Caplan, R., Brown, K., Paz, C.: The open data era in health and social care: a blueprint for the National Health Service (NHS England) to develop a research and learning programme for the open data era in health and social care, 1st edn. The GOVLAB - New York University, New York (2014). http://thegovlab.org/nhs/. Accessed 23 May 2017
Dodds, L., Newman, A.: A guide to the open data maturity model: assessing your data publishing and use, 1st edn. Open Data Institute, London (2015). https://theodi.org/guides/maturity-model. Accessed 23 May 2017
Solar, M., Concha, G., Meijueiro, L.: A model to assess open government data in public agencies. In: 11th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government, pp. 210–221. Springer, Kristiansand (2012)
Carrara, W., Nieuwenhuis, M., Vollers, H.: Open Data Maturity in Europe 2016: Insights into the European State of Play, 1st edn. Capgemini Consulting (2016). https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/edp_landscaping_insight_report_n2_2016.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017
Máchová, R., Lnenicka, M.: Evaluating the quality of open data portals on the national level. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 12(1), 21–41 (2017). http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/jtaer/v12n1/art03.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2017
worldbank.org: Readiness Assessment Tool (2017). http://opendatatoolkit.worldbank.org/en/odra.html. Accessed 23 May 2017
Open Data Certificate: ODI Open Data Certificate (2017). https://certificates.theodi.org/en/. Accessed 23 May 2017
Global Open Data Index: Place Overview - Global Open Data Index (2017). https://index.okfn.org/. Accessed 23 May 2017
UN E-Government Knowledge Database: UN E-Government Survey 2016 (2017). https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2016. Accessed 23 May 2017
Open Data 500: Open Data 500 (2017). http://www.opendata500.com/. Accessed 23 May 2017
Caplan, R., Davies, T., Wadud, A., Verhulst, S., Alonso, J., Farhan, H.: Towards common methods for assessing open data: workshop report & draft framework, 1st edn. Open Data Research Network, New York (2014). http://opendataresearch.org/sites/default/files/posts/Common%20Assessment%20Workshop%20Report.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017
Sayogo, D., Pardo, T., Cook, M.: A framework for benchmarking open government data efforts. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, Waikoloa (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.240. Accessed 23 May 2017
Yang, T., Lo, J., Wang, H., Shiang, J.: Open data development and value-added government information: case studies of Taiwan E-government. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 238–241. ACM, New York (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2591888.2591932. Accessed 23 May 2017
Sieber, R., Johnson, P.: Civic open data at a crossroads: dominant models and current challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(3), 308–315 (2015)
Susha, I., Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Gronlund, A.: Benchmarks for evaluating the progress of open data adoption: usage, limitations, and lessons learned. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 33(5), 613–630 (2014). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0894439314560852. Accessed 7 Apr. 2017
Donker, F., Loenen, B.: How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? Int. J. Digit. Earth 10(3), 284–306 (2016). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17538947.2016.1224938?needAccess=true. Accessed 9 Apr. 2017
Shekhar, S., Padmanabhan, V.: How to apply assessment tools for shaping successful public sector open data initiatives. Open Data Institute, London (2016)
Dawes, S.; Vidiasova, L., Trutnev, D.: Approach to assessing open government data program: comparison of common traits and differences at global context. In: EGOSE 2015 Processing of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia, Russian Federation, 24–25 November 2015
Verhulst, S.: How to advance open data research: towards an understanding of demand, users and key data. WWW Foundation press release, GovLab, posted on 15 September 2016 (2016)
Dawes, S.S., Vidiasova, L., Parkhimovich, O.: Planning and designing open government data programs: an ecosystem approach. Gov. Inf. Q. 33, 15–27 (2016)
Veljković, N., Bogdanovic-Dinic, S., Stoimenov, L.: Benchmarking open government: an open data perspective. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(2), 278–290 (2014)
Styrin, E., Luna-Reyes, L., Harrison, T.: Open data ecosystems: an international comparison. Transforming Gov. People Process Policy 11(1), 132–156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2017-0006
Srimuang, C., Cooharojananone, N., Tanlamai, U., Chandrachai, A.: Open government data assessment model: an indicator development in Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology, pp. 341–347 (2017)
Belhiah, M., Bounabat, B.: A user-centered model for assessing and improving open government data quality. In: MIT International Conference on Information Quality, UA Little Rock, USA, 6–7 October 2017
Vetro, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Minotas, C.O., Iemma, R., Morando, F.: Open data quality measurement framework: definition and application to Open Government Data. Gov. Inf. Q. (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001
Wirtz, B., Weyerer, J., Rӧsch, M.: Citizen and open government: an empirical analysis of antecedents of open government data. Int. J. Public Adm. 1–13 (2017)
Ohemeng, F., Ofosu-Adarkwa, K.: One way traffic: the open data initiative project and the need for an effective demand side initiative in Ghana. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 419–428 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Katbi, AK., Al-Ammary, J. (2019). Open Government Data in Kingdom of Bahrain: Towards an Effective Implementation Framework. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) New Knowledge in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'19 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 930. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16180-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16181-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)