Abstract
Open government data (OGD) could bring various aspects of benefits through transparency and access. Thus, governments have proposed policies and practices to disclose more data to the public. However, studies have shown the utilization of OGD instead of disclosure as a key problem. Although citizens are recognized as a key participant in the utilization process of OGD from demand-side, few studies have revealed the possible relationship among OGD users, their demands of data and utilization. Therefore, our study carried out a survey on a Chinese population to analyse the possible relationship between these three. Results show citizens’ limited awareness of OGD and portals, and their different demands of OGD subjects due to different socio-demographic characteristics. Daily life and anticorruption were the two main types of OGD utilization by citizens. Their types of usage are affected by their education and knowledge of OGD. Different types of utilization could lead to different demands for OGD subjects. We suggest governments to improve citizens’ awareness of their efforts to provide OGD, and deliver more data in the subject categories that are in greater need by citizens. Further studies need to be carried out on citizens’ motivation of OGD utilization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attard, J., et al.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)
Ubaldi, B.: Open government data: towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Work. Pap. Pub. Gov. (22), p. 0_1 (2013)
Conradie, P., Choenni, S.: On the barriers for local government releasing open data. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, S10–S17 (2014)
Jaeger, P.: Deliberative democracy and the conceptual foundations of electronic government. Gov. Inf. Q. 22(4), 702–719 (2005)
Jaeger, P., Bertot, J.C.: Transparency and technological change: ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(4), 371–376 (2010)
Jaeger, P., Burnett, G.: Information access and exchange among small worlds in a democratic society: the role of policy in shaping information behavior in the post-9/11 United States. Libr. Q. 75(4), 464–495 (2005)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: Open data policies, their implementation and impact: a framework for comparison. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(1), 17–29 (2014)
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., Zuiderwijk, A.: Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Inf. Syst. Manag. 29(4), 258–268 (2012)
Heise, A., Naumann, F.: Integrating open government data with stratosphere for more transparency. Web Seman. Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 14, 45–56 (2012)
Kassen, M.: A promising phenomenon of open data: a case study of the Chicago open data project. Gov. Inf. Q. 30(4), 508–513 (2013)
Safarov, I., Meijer, A., Grimmelikhuijsen, S.: Utilization of open government data: a systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Inf. Polity 22, 1–24 (2017)
Ruijer, E., et al.: Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 470–480 (2017)
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M.: A coordination theory perspective to improve the use of open data in policy-making. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 38–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_4
Wang, H.-J., Lo, J.: Adoption of open government data among government agencies. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(1), 80–88 (2016)
Meijer, A., de Hoog, J., van Twist, M., van der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J.: Understanding the dynamics of open data: from sweeping statements to complex contextual interactions. In: Gascó-Hernández, M. (ed.) Open Government. PAIT, vol. 4, pp. 101–114. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_7
Willinsky, J.: The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday 10(8) (2005). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue10-8/willinsky/index.html
Florini, A.: Making transparency work. Glob. Environ. Politics 8(2), 14–16 (2008)
Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., Kuhn, J.: Open government objectives and participation motivations. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(1), 30–42 (2015)
King, W.R., He, J.: A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 43(6), 740–755 (2006)
Power, R., Robinson, B., Rudd, L., Reeson, A.: Scenario planning case studies using open government data. In: Denzer, R., Argent, R.M., Schimak, G., Hřebíček, J. (eds.) ISESS 2015. LNCS, vol. 448, pp. 207–216. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15994-2_20
Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., Ginner, M.: Open government data implementation evaluation. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(2), 80–99 (2014)
Susha, I., Grönlund, Å., Janssen, M.: Driving factors of service innovation using open government data: an exploratory study of entrepreneurs in two countries. Inf. Polity 20(1), 19–34 (2015)
Magalhaes, G., Roseira, C. Manley, L.: Business models for open government data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2014)
Gonzalez-Zapata, F., Heeks, R.: The multiple meanings of open government data: understanding different stakeholders and their perspectives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 441–452 (2015)
Whitmore, A.: Using open government data to predict war: a case study of data and systems challenges. Gov. Inf. Q. 31(4), 622–630 (2014)
Veeckman, C., van der Graaf, S.: The city as living laboratory: empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 5(3), 6–17 (2015)
Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T.A., Venkatraman, S.: Understanding e-Government portal use in rural India: role of demographic and personality characteristics. Inf. Syst. J. 24(3), 249–269 (2014)
Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Linked open government data analytics. In: Wimmer, Maria A., Janssen, M., Scholl, Hans J. (eds.) EGOV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8074, pp. 99–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_9
Kuhn, K.: Open government data and public transportation. J. Publ. Transp. 14(1), 5 (2011)
Chakraborty, A., et al.: Open data for informal settlements: toward a user׳ s guide for urban managers and planners. J. Urban Manag. 4(2), 74–91 (2015)
Desouza, K.C., Bhagwatwar, A.: Citizen apps to solve complex urban problems. J. Urban Technol. 19(3), 107–136 (2012)
Rajshree, N., Srivastava, B.: Open government data for tackling corruption-a perspective. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2012)
Leontieva, L.S., et al.: Social-communicative innovations in anti-corruption activities (regional aspect). Asian Soc. Sci. 11(7), 387 (2015)
Harvey, M., et al.: Between demand and consumption: a framework for research. Centre Res. Innov. Compe. Discuss. Paper 40, 1–77 (2001)
Warde, A.: Consumption and theories of practice. J. Consum. Cult. 5(2), 131–153 (2005)
Murillo, M.J.: Evaluating the role of online data availability: the case of economic and institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 36(1), 42–59 (2015)
Bogdanović-Dinić, S., Veljković, N., Stoimenov, L.: How open are public government data? An assessment of seven open data portals. In: Rodríguez-Bolívar, M.P. (ed.) Measuring E-government Efficiency. PAIT, vol. 5, pp. 25–44. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9982-4_3
Wang, D., Chen, C., Richards, D.: A prioritization-based analysis of local open government data portals: A case study of Chinese province-level governments. Gov. Inf. Q. 35(4), 644–656 (2018)
StateCouncil, Notice of the State Council on Issuing the Interim Measures for the Administration of Sharing of Government Information Resources, T.S. Council, Editor, Beijing (2016)
Huang, R., Wang, C.: An investigation into the open government data platform in china. Inf. Stud.: Theory Appl. 39(7), 50–55 (2016)
Cronbach, L.J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3), 297–334 (1951)
Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011)
Kaiser, H.F.: A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35(4), 401–415 (1970)
Dziuban, C.D., Shirkey, E.C.: When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychol. Bull. 81(6), 358 (1974)
Fuentes-Enriquez, R., Rojas-Romero, Y.: Developing accountability, transparency and government efficiency through mobile apps: the case of Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. ACM (2013)
Yi, K., Jin, T.: Hyperlink analysis of the visibility of Canadian library and information science school web sites. Online Inf. Review 32(3), 325–347 (2008)
OpenDataBarometer Open Data Barometer Global Report, 4th edn. (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, D., Richards, D., Chen, C. (2019). Connecting Users, Data and Utilization: A Demand-Side Analysis of Open Government Data. In: Taylor, N., Christian-Lamb, C., Martin, M., Nardi, B. (eds) Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11420. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15741-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15742-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)