How to Increase Older Adults’ Accessibility to Mobile Technology? The New ECOMODE Camera | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

How to Increase Older Adults’ Accessibility to Mobile Technology? The New ECOMODE Camera

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 540))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 521 Accesses

Abstract

Designing and developing mobile technology that is able to meet the needs of older adults is fundamental to improve their independent living and expand their social inclusion. However, although mobile technology is nowadays widely present in our every-day activities, older adults continue to lag in its adoption. While exploring what hinders older adults in adopting mobile technology and questioning about how to increase their accessibility to it, the paper presents the ECOMODE project, whose technology based on the Event-Driven Compressive (EDC) paradigm is a possible answer. First, to contextualize our study, the paper describes the ECOMODE technology based on multimodal interaction, i.e. mid-air gestures combined with voice commands. Then, it details the process followed to design the interaction based on the ECOMODE technology, which aims to increase accessibility and usability of mobile devices for older adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 17159
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
JPY 21449
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ecomode-project.eu/.

References

  1. Naranjo, F. Z., & Pérez, A. A (2014). Facultad de Geografía e Historia. Universidad de Sevilla. De-partamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa. Facultad de Matemáticas. Universidad de Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute National de la statistique et des études économiques: Population totale parsexe et âge au 1er janvier 2016, France (2016). Available on: https://www.insee.fr/fr/accueil.

  3. Istituto nazionale di statistica: Struttura della popolazione dal 2002 al 2016 (2016). Available (in Italian) on: http://demo.istat.it/.

  4. The EU in the world 2016—A statistical portrait (2016). Online Eurostat publication, also down- loadable in pdf format, ISBN 978-92-79-59231-7, https://doi.org/10.2785/745946, Cat. No KS-EX-16-001- EN-N. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/The_EU_in_the_world.

  5. Crews, D. E., & Zavotka, S. (2006). Aging, disability, and frailty: Implications for universal design. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 25(1), 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2009). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blažun, H., Saranto, K., Kokol, P., & Vošner, J. (2012). Information and communication technology as a tool for improving physical and social activity of the elderly. In NI 2012: 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23–27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. (Vol. 2012). American Medical Informatics Association.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, A. (2015). Older adults and technology Use. Pew research center report. Last retrieved on 04/14/2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/04/03/older-adults-and-technology-use/.

  9. Ofcom. (2016). Adults’ Media Use and Attitudes Report. https://www.ofcom.org.uk/data/assets/pdf_file/0026/80828/2016-adults-media-use-and-attitudes.pdf.

  10. Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernandez-Encuentra, E., Pousada, M., & Gomez-Zuniga, B. (2009). ICT and older people: Beyond usability. Educational Gerontology, 35, 226–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fraser, J., & Gutwin, C. (2000). A framework of assistive pointers for low vision users. In Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive technologies (pp. 9–16). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Metter, E. J., Conwit, R., Tobin, J., & Fozard, J. L. (1997). Age-associated loss of power and strength in the upper extremities in women and men. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 52(5), B267–B276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taveira, A. D., & Choi, S. D. (2009). Review study of computer input devices and older users. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25(5), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Findlater, L., Froehlich, J. E., Fattal, K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Dastyar, T. (2013, April). Age-related differences in performance with touchscreens compared to traditional mouse input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 343–346). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  16. White-Chu, E. F., & Reddy, M. (2011). Dry skin in the elderly: Complexities of a common problem. Clinics in Dermatology, 29(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oviatt, S. (2012) Multimodal interfaces. In J. Jacko (Ed.), Human computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (3rd ed., pp. 405–430). Mahwah, N. J.: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Conci, M., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M. (2009, August). Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 63–76). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., & Nischelwitzer, A. (2007). On some aspects of improving mobile applications for the elderly. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 923–932). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doyle, J., Bertolotto, M., & Wilson, D. (2013). Towards Multimodal Mobile GIS for the Elderly. In Digital Literacy: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 590–609). IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Byrne, W., Doermann, D., Franz, M., Gustman, S., Hajic, J., Oard, D., et al. (2004). Automatic recognition of spontaneous speech for access to multilingual oral history archives. Speech and Audio Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 12(4), 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, X. A., Schwarz, J., Harrison, C., Mankoff, J., & Hudson, S. E. (2014, October). Air + touch: interweaving touch & in-air gestures. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 519–525). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coelho, J., Duarte, C., Biswas, P., & Langdon, P. (2011, October). Developing accessible TV applications. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 131–138). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jian, C., Shi, H., Schafmeister, F., Rachuy, C., Sasse, N., Schmidt, H., et al. (2013). Touch and speech: Multimodal interaction for elderly persons. In International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (pp. 385–400). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Jude, A., Poor, G. M., & Guinness, D. (2014). Evaluating multimodal interaction with gestures and speech for point and select tasks. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 1027–1030). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkowska, W., & Ziefle, M. (2009). Which factors form older adults’ acceptance of mobile in- formation and communication technologies? (pp. 81–101). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Turk, M. (2014). Multimodal interaction: A review. Pattern Recognition Letters, 36, 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Caprani, N., O’Connor, N. E., & Gurrin, C. (2012). Touch screens for the older user. In Assistive technologies. UK: InTech.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Basson, S., Fairweather, P. G., & Hanson, V. L. (2007). Speech recognition and alternative interfaces for older users. Interactions, 14(4), 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vipperla, R., Renals, S., & Frankel, J. (2008). Longitudinal study of ASR performance on ageing voices.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rousan, M., & Assaleh, K. (2011). A wavelet and neural network-based voice system for a smart wheelchair control. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 348(1), 90–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. LaViola Jr, J. J. (2014). An introduction to 3D gestural interfaces. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Courses (p. 25). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carreira, M., Ting, K. L. H., Csobanka, P., & Gonçalves, D. (2017). Evaluation of in-air hand gestures interaction for older people. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(3), 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen, M. Y., Mummert, L., Pillai, P., Hauptmann, A., & Sukthankar, R. (2010, March). Controlling your TV with gestures. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval (pp. 405–408). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cody, M. J., Dunn, D., Hoppin, S., & Wendt, P. (1999). Silver surfers: Training and evaluating Internet use among older adult learners. Communication Education, 48(4), 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cooper, G., & Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the user: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. Cambridge Series on Human Computer Interaction, 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Harrison, S., Sengers, P., & Tatar, D. (2011). Making epistemological trouble: Third paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rogers, Y., & Marsden, G. (2013). Does he take sugar? Moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. Interactions, 20(4), 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Camuñas-Mesa, L., et al. (2012). An event-driven multi-kernel convolution processor module for event-driven vision sensors. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 47(2), 504–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 587–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sanders, E. B. N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. Co-design, 4(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schiavo, G., Ferron, M., Mich, O., & Mana, N. (2016). Wizard of Oz studies with older adults: A methodological note. International Reports on Socio-Informatics, 13(3), 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gregor, P., Newell, A. F., & Zajicek, M. (2002). Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people. In Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 151–156). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., & Olivier, P. (2012). Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1199–1208). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Censis. (2013). Gli anziani: Una risorsa per il Paese. Dossier (in Italian) available at http://www.censis.it/14?shadow_ricerca=120985.

  46. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS, Quarterly, 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hanson, V. L. (2010). Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interacting with Computers, 22(6), 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ryan, E. B., Szechtman, B., & Bodkin, J. (1992). Attitudes toward younger and older adults learning to use computers. Journal of Gerontology, 47(2), P96–P101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., & Olivier, P. (2012). Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1199–1208). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the EU HORIZON 2020 project ECOMODE—Event-Driven Compressive Vision for Multimodal Interaction with Mobile Devices (http://www.ecomode-project.eu/), under Grant Agreement 644096.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FBK—Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Via Sommarive 18, 38123, Trento, Italy

    Nadia Mana, Ornella Mich & Michela Ferron

Authors
  1. Nadia Mana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ornella Mich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michela Ferron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Mana .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Niccolò Casiddu

  2. University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Claudia Porfirione

  3. Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

    Andrea Monteriù

  4. The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pontedera, Pisa, Italy

    Filippo Cavallo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mana, N., Mich, O., Ferron, M. (2019). How to Increase Older Adults’ Accessibility to Mobile Technology? The New ECOMODE Camera. In: Casiddu, N., Porfirione, C., Monteriù, A., Cavallo, F. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04672-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation