Definition of Modeling vs. Programming Languages | SpringerLink
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Definition of Modeling vs. Programming Languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Modeling (ISoLA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11244))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Modeling languages (like UML and SysML) are those used in model-based specification of software-intensive systems. Like programming languages, they are defined using their syntax and semantics. However, both kinds of languages are defined by different communities, and in response to different requirements, which makes their methodologies and tools different. In this paper, we highlight the main differences between the definition methodologies of modeling and programming languages. We also discuss the impact of these differences on language tool support. We illustrate our ideas using examples from known programming and modeling languages. We also present a case study, where we analyze the definition of a new modeling language called the Ontology Modeling Language (OML). We highlight the requirements that have driven OML definition and explain how they are different from those driving typical programming languages. Finally, we discuss how these differences are being abstracted away using new language definition tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 5719
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 7149
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hopcroft, J., Ullman, J.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Object Management Group: OMG Unified Modeling Language, version 2.5.1 (2017). http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.5.1/

  3. Object Management Group: OMG System Modeling Language, version 1.5 (2017). http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.5/

  4. Object Management Group: Business Process Model And Notation, version 2.0.2 (2014). http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/

  5. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility, version 2.5.1 (2016). http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.5.1/

  6. Jet Propulsion Laboratory: Ontology Modeling Language (OML) Workbench (2018). https://github.com/JPL-IMCE/gov.nasa.jpl.imce.oml.core

  7. Scowen, R.: Extended BNF — A generic base standard. In: Software Engineering Standards Symposium (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levine, J., Mason, T., Brown, D.: "Lex & Yacc," O’Reilly & Associates, October 1992. ISBN: 1565920007

    Google Scholar 

  9. Parr, T.: “ANTLR”. http://www.antlr.org/

  10. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework, 2nd edn. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merks, E.: “Xcore”. https://wiki.eclipse.org/Xcore

  13. Object Management Group: Object Constraint Language, version 2.4 (2014). http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.4/

  14. Object Management Group: XML Metadata Interchange, version 2.5.1 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/XMI/2.5.1/

  15. Object Management Group: MOF Model to Text Transformation Language, version 1.0 (2008). http://www.omg.org/spec/MOFM2T/1.0/

  16. Obeo: Acceleo. https://www.eclipse.org/acceleo/

  17. TypeFox: Xtext. https://www.eclipse.org/Xtext/

  18. Object Management Group: Diagram Definition, version 1.1 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/DD/1.1/

  19. Object Management Group: MOF Query/View/Transformation, version 1.3 (2016). http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.3/

  20. CEA-LIST: Papyrus. https://www.eclipse.org/papyrus/

  21. Eclipse: Graphical Modeling Project (GMP). http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/gmp/

  22. Obeo: Sirius. https://www.eclipse.org/sirius/

  23. Object Management Group: Business Motivation Model, version 1.3 (2015). http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.3/

  24. Object Management Group: Semantics of a Foundational Subset for Executable UML Models, version 1.3 (2017). http://www.omg.org/spec/FUML/1.3/

  25. Microsoft: Language Server Protocol. https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/

  26. Eclipse: CDO Model Repository. https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/modeling.emf.cdo

  27. Git. https://git-scm.com/

  28. Eclipse: EMF Compare. https://www.eclipse.org/emf/compare/

  29. W3C: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (2nd edn.) (2012). https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/

  30. Apache: Apache Jena. https://jena.apache.org/

  31. W3C: SPARQL Query Language for RDF (2008). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  32. Apache: Apache Spark. https://spark.apache.org/

  33. Object Management Group: Action Language for Foundational UML, version 1.1 (2017). http://www.omg.org/spec/ALF/1.1/

  34. Eclipse: Xtend. https://www.eclipse.org/xtend/

  35. React: Introducing JSX. https://reactjs.org/docs/introducing-jsx.html

  36. R-Project The R Project for Statistical Analysis. https://www.r-project.org/

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USA

    Maged Elaasar

Authors
  1. Maged Elaasar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maged Elaasar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Tiziana Margaria

  2. TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

    Bernhard Steffen

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement by the United States Government or the Jet Propulsion Labor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elaasar, M. (2018). Definition of Modeling vs. Programming Languages. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds) Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Modeling. ISoLA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11244. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03418-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03418-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03417-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03418-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics