Corpus Callosum MR Image Classification | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Corpus Callosum MR Image Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI

Abstract

An approach to classifying Magnetic Resonance (MR) image data is described. The specific application is the classification of MRI scan data according to the nature of the corpus callosum, however the approach has more general applicability. A variation of the “spectral segmentation with multi-scale graph decomposition” mechanism is introduced. The result of the segmentation is stored in a quad-tree data structure to which a weighted variation (also developed by the authors) of the gSpan algorithm is applied to identify frequent sub-trees. As a result the images are expressed as a set frequent sub-trees. There may be a great many of these and thus a decision tree based feature reduction technique is applied before classification takes place. The results show that the proposed approach performs both efficiently and effectively, obtaining a classification accuracy of over 95% in the case of the given application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 22879
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 28599
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen, L., Richey, M., Chain, Y. and Gorski, R. (1991). Sex differences in the corpus callosum of the living human being. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, pp 933-942.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, R. and Herskovits, E.H. (2005). A Bayesian Network Classifier with Inverse Tree Structure for Voxelwise Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis. Proc ACMSIGKDD 2005, pp 4-12.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chun, J. and Greenshields, R. (1995). Classification algorithm for Multi-Echo Magnetic Resonance Image using Gibbs distributions Proc 3rd Int. Conf. on Image Analysis Applications and Computer Graphics, Spinger LNCS, pp 419-426.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cour, T., Benezit, F. and Shi, J. (2005). Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cvpr’05), 2, pp 1124-1131.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cowell, P., Kertesz, A. and Denenberg, V. (1993). Multiple dimensions of handedness and the human corpus callosum. Neurology, 43, pp 2353-2357.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davatzikos, C., Vaillant, M., Resnick, S.,Prince, J., S. Letovsky, S. and Bryan, R. (1996). A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 20, pp 88-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duara, R., Kushch, A., Gross-Glenn, K., Barker, W., Jallad, B., Pascal, S., Loewenstein, D., Sheldon, J., Rabin, M., Levin B. and Lubs, H. (1991). Neuroanatomic differences between dyslexic and normal readers on magnetic resonance imaging scans. Archives of Neurology, 48, pp 410-416.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grabczewski, K. and Jankowski, N. (2005). Feature selection with decision tree criterion. Proc 5th Int. Conf. on Hybrid Intelligent Systems (HIS’05), pp 212-217.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hampel, H., Teipel, S., Alexander, G.,Horwitz, B., Teichberg, D., Schapiro, M. and Rapoport, S. (1998). corpus callosum atrophy is a possible indicator of region and cell type-specific neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 55, pp 193-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Herskovits EH, Gerring JP. (2003). Application of a data-mining method based on Bayesian networks to lesion-deficit analysis. Proc, Neuroimage. pp 1664-73.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hynd, G., Hall, J., Novey, E., Eliopulos, D., Black, K., Gonzalez J., Edmonds, J., Riccio, C. and Cohen, M. (1995). Dyslexia and corpus callosum morphology. Archives of Neurology, 52, pp 32-38.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, C. and Coenen, F. (2008). Graph-based Image Classification by Weighting Scheme. Proc. AI’2008, Springer, pp 63-76.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohavi, R. and John, G. (1997). Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence, 97(1-2), pp 273-324.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lyoo, I., Satlin, A., C. K. Lee, C. and Renshaw, P. (1997). Regional atrophy of the corpus callosum in subjects with Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Psychiatry Research, 74, pp 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Machado, A., Gee, J., Campos, M., (2004). Visual data mining for modeling prior distributions in morphometry Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE Volume 21, Issue 3, May 2004 pp 20-27.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Magoulas, G. and Prentza, A. (1999). Machine learning in Medical Applications, Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Applications (ACAI-99), pp 53-58.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Quinlan R. (1993). C4.5: A program for machine learning, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ruan, S., Jaggi, C., Xue, J., Fadili, J. and Bloyet, D. (2000). Brain Tissue Classification of Magnetic Resonance Images Using Partial Volume Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 19(12), pp 1179-1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Salat, D.,Ward, A., Kaye, J. and Janowsky, J. (1997). Sex differences in the corpus callosum with aging. Journal of Neurobiology of Aging, 18, pp 191-197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shi, J. and Malik, J. (2000). Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weis, S., Kimbacher, M.,Wenger, E. and Neuhold, A. (1993). Morphometric analysis of the corpus callosum using MRI: Correlation of measurements with aging in healthy individuals. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 14, pp 637-645.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yan, X. and Han, J. (2002). gspan: Graph-based substructure pattern mining. In ICDM’02: 2nd IEEE Conf. Data Mining, pp 721-724.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, Y. and Pedersen, J. (1997). A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In D. H. Fisher, editor, Proceedings of ICML-97, 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, Nashville, US, 1997. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, US, pp 412-420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Elsayed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elsayed, A., Coenen, F., Jiang, C., García-Fiñana, M., Sluming, V. (2010). Corpus Callosum MR Image Classification. In: Bramer, M., Ellis, R., Petridis, M. (eds) Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-983-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-983-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-982-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-983-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics