Studies in awareness systems tend to focus on the informational aspects of interactions. This emphasis is warranted in systems that aim to support instrumental activities, such as collaboration and coordination (e.g. Begole and Tang, 2007) or messaging (e.g. Cheverst et al., 2007). Such activities usually involve the use of information, sometimes collected by sensors, about location, status and activity. However, when awareness systems have the core aim to maintain human relationships, the benefits may come not just from the sharing of awareness information per se, but more from the simple act of exchange.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashkansy, S., Benda, P. and Vetere, F. (2007). Happy coincidences in designing for social connectedness and play through opportunistic image capture. In Proceedings of Designing User Experience (DUX) 2007.
Begole J. and Tang J.C. (2007). Incorporating human and machine interpretation of unavailability and rhythm awareness into the design of collaborative applications. Human–Computer Interaction, 22, 7–45.
Bickmore, T. W., and Picard, R. W. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327.
Brown, B., Taylor, A., Izadi, S., Sellen, A., Kaye, J., and Eardley, R. (2007). Locating Family Values: A Field Trial of the Whereabouts Clock. Ubicomp 2007: 354–371.
Calvi, L. (2005). Sociability with ubiquitous technologies: A view on phatic interactions. In proceedings of SIGCHI.nl conference, ACM Press.
Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D., and Graham, C. (2007). Exploring awareness related messaging through two situated-display-based systems. Human–Computer Interaction, 22, 173–220.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
de Souza, C. S. (1993). The semiotic engineering of user interface languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 753–773.
Evjemo, B., Svendsen, G. B., Rinde, E., and Johnsen, J. A. K. (2004). Supporting the distributed family: The need for a conversational context. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 309–312.
Facebook (2007). http://www.Facebook.com/help.php?page=20 accessed on 13 September, 2007.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. San Fransisco, CA, Morgan Kaufmann.
Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to Communication Studies. New York, Routledge.
Gibbs, M., Vetere, F., Howard, S. and Bunyan, M. (2005). SynchroMate: A phatic technology for mediating intimacy. DUX: Conference on Designing for User eXperience, San Francisco, CA (3–5 Nov).
Hoffmann, C., Jumpertz, S., and Marquet, B. (2007). On nurturing strong-tie distant relationships: from theory to prototype. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’07, 2411–2416.
Jakobson, R. (1981). Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry (Vol. 3). The Hague, Mouton.
Kaye, J. (2006). I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. In CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 22–27, 2006). CHI ’06. ACM, New York, 363–368.
Licoppe, C. and Smoreda, Z. (2005). Are social networks technologically embedded? How networks are changing today with changes in communication technology. Social Networks, 27(4), 317–335.
Lindsay, P. H., and Norman, D. A. (1972). Human Information Processing. New York, Academic Press.
Malinowski, B. (1949). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards (Eds.), The Meaning of Meaning (Tenth ed., pp. 296–336). London, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd (First ed., 1923).
Markopoulos, P., de Ruyter, B., and Mackay, W. (2007). Introduction to this special issue on awareness systems design. Human–Computer Interaction, 22, 1–6.
Mueller, F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S., and Howard, S. (2005). Hug Over a Distance CHI 2005 (Interactive Poster), Portland, Oregon USA (2–7 April), 1673–1676.
Nadin, M. (1988). Interface design: A semiotic paradigm. Semiotica, 69(3/4), 269–302.
Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., and Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 79–88.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomingon and Indianapolis, Indiana University Press.
Oulasvirta, A., Petit, R., and Raento, M. (2007). Interpreting and acting on mobile awareness cues. Human–Computer Interaction, 22, 97–135.
Pimenta, M. S., and Faust, R. (1997). Eliciting interactive systems requirements in a language-centred user-designer collaboration: A semiotic approach. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(1), 61–65.
Prates, R. O., de Souza, C. S., and Garcia, A. C. B. (1997). A semiotic framework for multi-user interfaces. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(2), 28–39.
Purchase, H. (1999). A semiotic definition of multimedia communication. Semiotica, 123(3/4), 247–259.
Reddy, M. J. (1993). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (second ed., pp. 164–201). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Reynolds, C. (1998). As we may communicate. SIGCHI Bulletin, 30(3), 40–44.
Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., Baren, J., Ruyter, B., IJsselsteijn, W., and Farshchian, B. (2007). Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal Ubiquitous Computer, 11(4), (Apr. 2007), 299–312.
Schiphorst, T., Nack, F., KauwATjoe, M., de Bakker, S., Stock, Aroyo, L., Rosillio, A. P., Schut, H., and Jaffe, N. (2007). PillowTalk: Can we afford intimacy?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana, February 15–17, 2007). TEI ’07. ACM, New York, 23–30.
Schneider, K. P. (1988). Small Talk: Analysing Phatic Discourse. Hitzeroth.
Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign, IL, University of Illinois Press.
Taylor, A. and Harper, R. (2003). The gift of the gab?: A design oriented sociology of young people’s use of mobiles. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12(3), 267–296.
Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1).
Vetere, F., Gibbs, M., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., and Bunyan, M. (2005). Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. CHI 2005, Portland, Oregon USA (2–7 April).
Winograd, T. (1988). A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human Computer Interaction, 3, 3–30.
Zegarac, V., and Clark, B. (1998). Phatic Interpretations and phatic communication. Linguistics, 35, 24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vetere, F., Smith, J., Gibbs, M. (2009). Phatic Interactions: Being Aware and Feeling Connected. In: Markopoulos, P., De Ruyter, B., Mackay, W. (eds) Awareness Systems. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-477-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-477-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84882-476-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84882-477-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)