Abstract
The focus of sensemaking research is often on process and resources such as “schemas” and “frames”. Less attention has been paid to the conceptual structures that make up the schema or frame, or how visualisations can be designed to support users’ conceptual structures. In this chapter, we present an approach to gathering user requirements based on the conceptual structures that people are working with when making sense of a domain. We illustrate the approach with examples drawn from our own experience of designing, prototyping and testing an interactive visualisation tool for making sense of academic literature and of studies of sensemaking by lawyers and journalists. We discuss how to move from requirements to design, drawing on a classification of visualisations that highlights their principal conceptual structuring basis. Since each individual makes sense in their own way, it is beneficial to include features that enable people to work with a representation in their own way; for this, appropriation tools are helpful. We discuss the design of such features. Finally, we present an approach to evaluating interactive visualisations in terms of their support for sensemaking, focusing on the quality of the fit between users and system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlberg, C., & Shneiderman, B. (1994). Visual Information Seeking Using the FilmFinder. CHI’94.
Attfield S. & Blandford A. (2010) Discovery-led Refinement in e-Discovery Investigations: Sensemaking, Cognitive Ergonomics and System Design. Artificial Intelligence and Law - Special Issue on e-Discovery, 18.4, 387–412.
Attfield, S. & Blandford, A. (2011) Making sense of digital footprints in team-based legal investigations: The acquisition of focus. Human–Computer Interaction Journal. 26.1&2, 38–71.
Barone, R., & Cheng, P. C. H. (2004). Representations for Problem Solving: On the Benefits of Integrated Structure. In Proc. IV04. IEEE Computer Society (pp. 575–580)
Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press
Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K. (1998) Contextual Design. San Francisco : Morgan Kaufmann.
Blandford, A. & Attfield, S. (2010) Interacting with information. Morgan & Claypool. http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00227ED1V01Y200911HCI006
Blandford, A. E. & Green, T. R. G. (2001) Group and individual time management tools: what you get is not what you need. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 5.4, 213–230.
Blandford, A., Green, T. R. G., Furniss, D. & Makri, S. (2008) Evaluating system utility and conceptual fit using CASSM. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies. 66. 393–409.
Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J., & Murphy, J. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. In Proc. 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference, 1777–1785.
Carroll, J. M. & Rosson, M. B. (1992) Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10.2, 181–21.
Craft, B., & Cairns, P. (2008). Directions for Methodological Research in Information Visualisation. In Information Visualisation, 2008. 44–50.
Dix, A. (2007). Designing for Appropriation. In Proc. 21st British HCI Group Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 28–30). Lancaster, UK
Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. (1984) Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Faisal, S., Attfield, S. & Blandford, A. (2009) A Classification of Sensemaking Representations. CHI 2009 Workshop on Sensemaking.
Faisal, S., Cairns, P. & Blandford, A. (2006) Developing User Requirements for Visualizations of Literature Knowledge Domains. In Proc. IV06.
Faisal, S., Cairns, P. & Blandford, A. (2007) Building for Users not for Experts: Designing a Visualization of the Literature Domain. In Proc. IV07.
Faisal, S., Cairns, P. & Blandford, A. (submitted) Designing for seamless interaction with visual analytic tools. Submitted for journal publication.
Fekete, J., Grinstein, G., & Plaisant, C. (2004). IEEE InfoVis 2004 Contest, the history of InfoVis. Retrieved from www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/iv04contest (2004).
Hackos, J. & Redish, J. (1998) User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. John Wiley & Sons
Heer, J., & Boyd, D. (2005). Vizster: Visualizing Online Social Networks. InfoVis’05.IEEE
Johnson, J. & Henderson, A. (2012) Conceptual Models: Core to Good Design. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. doi: 10.2200/S00391ED1V01Y201111HCI012
Kang, Y., Görg, C. & Stasko, J. (2011) How Can Visual Analytics Assist Investigative Analysis? Design Implications from an Evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17.5, 570–583.
Klein, G., Phillips, J. K., Rall, E. L., & Peluso, D. A. (2007). A Data-Frame Theory of Sensemaking. In R. Hoffman (Ed.), Expertise Out of Context: Proc. Int. Conf. on Naturalistic Decision Making. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc, US, 113–155.
Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: a practitioner’s guide to user research, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
Moran, T.P. (1983) Getting Into a System: External-internal Task Mapping Analysis, in A.Janda (ed.), Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 45–49. ACM SIGCHI and Human Factors Society conference proceedings, Boston, December 1983. New York: ACM Press.
Norman, D.A. (1986) Cognitive Engineering. In D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper, Eds. User Centered System Design, Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 31–62
Payne, S.J., Squibb, H.R. & Howes, A. (1990) The nature of device models: The yoked state space hypothesis, and some experiments with text editors. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 415–444.
Pirolli P. and Card S., (2005) The Sensemaking Process and Leverage Points for Analyst Technology as Identified Through Cognitive Task Analysis. In: Proc. International Conference on Intelligence Analysis (McLean, VA, May 2–6, 2005).
Russell, D. M., Stefik, M., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. (1993). The Cost Structure of Sensemaking. In Proc. INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 (pp. 269–276). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ACM
Shneiderman, B. (1996). The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualisations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (p. 336–343). IEEE Computer Society
Shrinivasan, Y. B., & Wijk, J. J. V. (2008). Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualisation. In Proc. CHI (pp. 1237–1246). ACM
Spence, R. (2007). Information Visualisation: Design for Interaction (2nd ed.). ACM Press Books
Stasko, J., Görg, C. & Liu, Z. (2008) Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization, Information Visualization, 7.2, 118–132.
Stasko, J., Gorg, C., Liu, Z., & Singhal, K. (2008). Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualisation. Information Visualisation, IEEE, 7(2), 118
Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tufte, E. R. (1986). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press Cheshire, CT, USA
Uren, V., Buckingham Shum, S., Bachler, M., & Li, G. (2006). Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation. IJHCS, 64(5), 420–445.
Ware, C. (2004). Information Visualisation: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann
Wigmore, J.H. (1931). The Principles of Judicial Proof. Little, Brown & Co.
Williamson, C. & Shneiderman, B. (1992) The Dynamic HomeFinder: Evaluating dynamic queries in a real-estate information exploration system, Proc. ACM SIGIR’92. 338–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blandford, A., Faisal, S., Attfield, S. (2014). Conceptual Design for Sensemaking. In: Huang, W. (eds) Handbook of Human Centric Visualization. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7484-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7485-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)