Abstract
The predicament in which we find ourselves today is that many professionals lack a sufficient grounding in formal methods, tools and techniques to enable them to make an appropriate selection for different kinds of problem. This can mean that complexity remains unrecognized and ambiguous problem situations are addressed as if they were clear and straightforward, resulting in inadequate solutions that are not experienced as useful by clients. We are thus faced with a circular dilemma. Those who attempt to use, e.g. SSM are unable to do so effectively through lack of understanding. They are thus driven back to the need for formal methods, and the disadvantages inherent in these approaches which SSM was originally created to address. Thus, there is a need to reintroduce into the agenda of soft and Agile methods an understanding of the skills and tool sets offered by hard/formal approaches. New professionals require a comprehensive education in use of tools and techniques, including their complementarity. This will not be delivered by training individuals in application of particular methodologies in a piecemeal and fragmented way, but by thorough and rigorous examination of whole methodologies in use. Only then can they engage in practice in the real world and develop their own tool sets, from which to select in an informed way those most appropriate to a problem situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organisational learning. Addison Wesley, Reading
Avison DE, Fitzgerald G (2006) Information systems development, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
Avison DE, Wood-Harper AT (1990) Multiview: an exploration in information systems development. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago University, Chicago
Bednar PM (2000) A contextual integration of individual and organizational learning perspectives as part of IS analysis. Inf Sci 3(3):2000
Brown G, Bull J, Pendlebury M (1997) Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge, London
Champion D, Stowell FA (2001) PEArL: a systems approach to demonstrating authenticity in information system design. J Inf Technol 16:3–12
Checkland P (1999) Systems thinking, systems practice: a 30-year retrospective. Wiley, Chichester
Cherns A (1976) Principles of socio-technical design. Hum Relat 2:783–792
Ciborra CU (2002) The labyrinths of information. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Engel CE (1991) Not just a method but a way of learning. In: Boud D, Feletti G (eds) The challenge of problem-based learning. Kogan Page, London, pp 23–33
Flensburg P (2008) The new informatics revolution—not. IRIS 31, Åre, Sweden, 10–13 Aug 2008
Friis S (1991) User controlled information systems development. Departement of Information and Computer Science, Lund University, Lund
Grant I (2007) India deal clears Skandia’s app maintenance backlog. Comput Weekly, 6(Nov):4
Jarvis P (2006) The Socratic method. In: Jarvis P (ed) The theory, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 90–97 (July 2006)
Kreher H (1994) Some recurring themes in using SSM. J Oper Res Soc 45:1293–1303
Langefors B (1966) Theoretical analysis of information systems. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Madsen S, Kautz K, Vidgen R (2006) A framework for understanding how a unique and local development method emerges in practice. EJIS 15:225–238
Mathiassen L, Munk-Madsen A, Nielsen PA, Stage J (2000) Object-oriented analysis and design. Forlaget Marko, Aalborg
Mathiassen L, Purao S (2002) Educating reflective systems developers. Inf Syst J 12(2):81–102
Mumford E (1983) Designing human systems: for new technology. Manchester Business School, Manchester
Mumford E (1995) Effective systems design And requirements analysis: the ethics method. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Mumford E (2003) Redesigning human systems. IRM Press, Hershey
Mumford E, Hickey S, Matthies H (2006) Designing human systems: an agile update to ETHICS. Lulu.com, Raleigh
Omland HO (2009) The relationships between competence, methods, and practice in information systems development. Scand J Inf Syst 21(2):3–26
Salvage I, Dhanda IS (2007) IBM white paper. IT service management: is it now too important to leave to the IT department alone? How and why the IT function needs to change its relationship with the business. IBM Global Technology Services, Sept 2007. http://whitepapers.theregister.co.uk/search/?q=IBM. Accessed 11 Nov 2007
Smith MF (1991) Software prototyping: adoption, practice and management. McGraw-Hill, London
Shore J, Warden S (2008) The art of agile development. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol
Stowell F, West D (1995) Client-led design: a systemic approach to information systems definition. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead
Ulrich W (2001) Boundary critique. In: Daellenbach HG, Flood, RL (eds) The informed student guide to management science, 2002. Thomson Learning, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bednar, P.M., Welch, C. (2011). The Right Tools for the Right Tasks: Meaningful Education for IS Professional. In: Pokorny, J., et al. Information Systems Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9790-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-9645-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-9790-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)