Abstract
A primary purpose of traditional systems analysis is seen as ‘capture’ or ‘elicitation’ of user requirements, in order to produce specifications as a basis for information systems design. Such a view presupposes that user requirements are pre-existing, and that the particular ‘users’ concerned know what they are, and can therefore articulate them. We argue that these assumptions cannot be taken for granted. If a system is to be created which is useful to particular individuals, we suggest they need to take ownership and control of the analysis themselves. By exploring their own experiences, aspirations and sense-making processes in the context of their problem space, they enable richer and more comprehensive understandings to emerge. A creative process of requirements shaping is then promoted. Our focus, therefore, moves away from problem description by an external analyst, towards contextual inquiry, which supports creative thinking and problem re-definition by those individuals most affected. We discuss contextual inquiry and requirements shaping to facilitate exploration of multiple, simultaneous and dynamic roles of the same autonomous individuals, separately and collectively. Their purpose is to enable emergence of reflective, shifting perspectives, leading to deepened understandings of problem experiences. It is then possible for resolutions to be created that address experiences, rather than descriptions, of problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agner Sigbo G., Ingman S. (1992). Sjalvstyre och flexibilitet drivkrafter vid kontinuerlig systemutveckling. Uppsala: Arbetsmiljofonden & NUTEK, Ord amp; Form AB.
Ashby, R. (1964). An Introduction to Cybernetics. Methuen:London.
Avison, D. E., Fitzgerald, G. (2005). Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools, McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead, 2nd edition.
Baark, E. (1986). The Context of National Information Systems in Developing Countries: India and China in a Comparative Perspective. Research Policy Institute, Lund University.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Ballantine:New York.
Bednar, P. M. (2000). A contextual integration of individual and organizational learning perspectives as part of IS analysis. Informing Science, 3 (3).
Bednar, P. M. (2007). Individual emergence in contextual analysis. Special Issue on Individual Emergence, Systemica (Journal of the Dutch Systems Group), 14 (1–6) 23–38.
Berger, P. L., Luckman, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Anchor Books:Garden City, NY
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2002). Enriching the model-building phase of soft systems methodology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19 (1) 27
Caldeira, M. M., Ward, J. M. (2003). Using Resource-based Theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Information Systems, 12, 127–141
Carlsson, S. (1993). A Longitudinal Study of User Developed Decision Support Systems. Department of Informatics, Lund University, Lund.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: A 30-Year Retrospective. Wiley: Chichester
Child, J. (1984). Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice. Paul Chapman:London
Ciborra, C. U. (2002). The Labyrinths of Information. Oxford University Press:Oxford.
Ciborra, C. U., Hanseth, O. (2000). Introduction: From control to drift. In C. Ciborra (editors), From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Cooray, S., Stowell, F. (2006). Investigating the concept of ‘Appreciative Settings’ as a Means of Understanding Weltanschauung. The Systemist, 28 (2), 60–69.
De Zeeuw, G. (2007). Foreword to Special Issue on Individual Emergence, Systemica (Journal of the Dutch Systems Group), 14 (1–6) ix–xi
Fincham, R. (2002). Narratives of success and failure in systems development, British Journal of Management, 13, 1–14 (British Academy of Management)
Flensburg, P. (1986). Personlig databehandling – introduktion, konsekvenser, mojligheter. Chartwell-Bratt and Studentlitteratur; Lund.
Friis, S. (1991). User Controlled Information Systems Development – Problems and Possibilities Towards Local Design Shops. Lund University Publications.
Gadamer, H. G. (1987). The problem of historical consciousness J. F. Close, Trans.). In P. Rabinow and W. M. Sullivan(editors), Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, pp 82–140. University of California Press: Berkeley. (Reprinted from La probleme de la conscience historique. Louvain: Institut Superieur de Philosoophie, Universite Catholique do Louvain, 1963).
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.) Beacon Press:Boston
Hagerfors, A. (1994). Co-learning in Participative Systems Design. Department of Informatics,Lund University, Lund.
Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. K. (1994). Realizing emancipatory principles in information systems development: The case for ETHICS. MIS Quarterly.
Husserl, E. (1954). The Crisis of European Sciences. Northwestern University Press:Evanston, IL.
Klein, H. K. (2004). Seeking the new and the critical in critical realism: déjà vu. Information and Organization, 14, 123–144.
Kling, R. (1999). What is social Informatics and Why Does it Matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5 (1),http://www.dlib.org/. Accessed 17 November 2006.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, 3rdedition
Langefors, B. (1966). Theoretical Analysis of Information Systems. Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Langefors, B. (1995). Essays on Infology.B V. Dahlbom (editor), Studentlitteratur, Lund.
Markus, M. L., Robey, D. (2004). Why stuff happens: Explaining the unintended consequences of using IT. In K. V. Anderson and M. T. Vendelø (editors), The Past and Future of Information Systems. Elsevier: Oxford.
Maturana, H., Varela, F. (1980). Autopoeisis and Cognition. D. Reidel Publishing:Dordrecht.
Minati, G. (2006). Multiple systems, collective beings, and the dynamic usage of models. The Systemist, 28 (2), 200–212.
Mumford, E. (1983). Designing Human Systems for New Technology: The ETHICS Method. Manchester Business School.
Mumford, E. (1995). Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS approach. Macmillan Press:Basingstoke.
Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review: pp 96–104.
Olerup, A. (1982). A Contextual Framework for computerized Information Systems, Nyt Nordisk Forlag Arnold Busk: Copenhagen.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12 (2) 174–207.
Polyani, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul:London
Sandstrom, G. (1985). Towards Transparent Data Bases – How to Interpret and Act on Expressions Mediated by Computerized Information Systems. Chartwell-Bratt & Studentlitteratur.
Saur, C. (1993). Why Systems Fail. Alfred Waller:Henley-on-Thames.
Sommerville, I. (2004). Software Engineering. Addison Wesley: Reading, MA, 7thedition.
Stowell, F. A., West, D. (1995). Client-Led Design: A Systemic Approach to Information System Definition. McGraw-Hill:Maidenhead
Ulrich, W. (2001). Critically systemic discourse: A discursive approach to reflective practice in ISD, Parts 1 and 3. The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 3 (3), 55–106.
Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Wiley:Chichester
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell:Oxford
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bednar, P.M., Welch, C. (2009). Contextual Inquiry and Requirements Shaping. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds) Information Systems Development. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-30403-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68772-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)