Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to the problem of designing autonomous agents that is based on the idea of anticipatory systems. An anticipatory system has a model of itself and of the relevant part of its environment and will use this model to predict the future. The predictions are then utilised to determine the agent's behaviour, i.e. it lets future states affect its present states. We argue that systems based on causal reasoning only, are too limited to serve as a proper base for designing autonomous agents. An anticipatory agent, on the other hand, will use reasoning from final cause to guide its current actions. We then discuss to what extent an anticipatory agent can be constructed from computable functions and we conclude that this problem is best expressed and analysed in linguistic terms. This discussion points out how such an agent should be designed and results in a proposal of an appropriate architecture. However, as the meta-linguistic problems involved are very hard to solve, a simpler architecture is also proposed. This is also a hybrid architecture that synthesizes reactive behaviour and deliberative reasoning, which, we believe, still has its merits compared to previous approaches to the design of autonomous agents. Finally, we discuss introspection and reflection, and show that the underlying concepts are easy to comprehend in the context of anticipatory systems.
Bertil Ekdahl's research is sponsored by Blekinge Research Foundation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Davidsson. Concepts and autonomous agents, (Licentiate thesis). LU-CS-TR: 94-124, Dept. of Computer Science, Lund University, Sweden, 1994.
B. Ekdahl. The concept of models in anticipatory agents. Technical Report LU-CS-TR: 95-?, Dept. of Computer Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 1995. In preparation.
J.H. Fetzer. The frame problem: Artificial intelligence meets David Hume. International Journal of Expert Systems, 3(3):219–232, 1990.
B.R. Gaines. Calculus of possibility, eventuality, and probability. Technical Report EES-MMS-FUZ-175, Dept. of Electr. Eng. Sci. University of Essex, Colchester, 1975.
D. Kirsh. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence, 47(1):161–184, 1991.
L. Löfgren. Methodologies and the induction problem. In R. Trappl et al., Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research Vol. VIII, pages 15–22. McGraw-Hill, 1982.
L. Löfgren. Autology of time. International Journal of General Systems, 10(1):5–14, 1984.
L. Löfgren. Autology. In Systems and Control Encyclopedia, pages 326–333. Pergamon Press, 1987.
E. Mendelson. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Wadwort & Brooks, 1987.
R. Rosen. Anticipatory Systems — Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations. Pergamon Press, 1985.
R. Rosen. Life Itself. Columbia Univ. Press, 1991.
B.C. Smith. Self-reference. In S.C. Shapiro, editor, Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence, pages 1005–1010. John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
A. Tarski. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford, 1956. second edition, J. Corcoran (ed.), Hacklett, 1983.
K.J. Åström and B. Wittenmark. Computer Controlled Systems: Theory and Design. Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ekdahl, B., Astor, E., Davidsson, P. (1995). Towards anticipatory agents. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Jennings, N.R. (eds) Intelligent Agents. ATAL 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58855-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58855-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49129-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive