Annotating Cooperative Plans with Trusted Agents | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Annotating Cooperative Plans with Trusted Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice (TRUST 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2631))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 840 Accesses

Abstract

Cooperation is the single most fundamental characteristic of multi-agent systems, and much work has been done on studying the various aspects involved, from general models of the overall structure of cooperation to detailed analyses of specific components. In our work, we aim to do both — we provide a general model and instantiate each stage in that model. We take the notions of trust and motivation to be fundamental to engendering successful cooperation between autonomous entities, and our model of cooperation accounts for the important roles played by these concepts. This paper focuses in particular on the details of how, based on trust, an agent chooses and keeps track of which agents it may use to assist in the performance of actions that make up a multi-agent plan, and how that information can be used in actually soliciting the assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. E. Bratman. Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review, 101(2):327–341, Apr. 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. Bratman, D. Israel, and M. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349–355, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone. Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 72–79, Paris, France, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. d’Inverno and M. Luck. Understanding Agent Systems. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Griffiths. Motivated Cooperation in Autonomous Agents. PhD thesis, University of Warwick, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Griffiths and M. Luck. Cooperative plan selection through trust. In F. J. Garijo and M. Boman, editors, Multi-Agent System Engineering: Proceedings of the Ninth European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World. Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Grosz and S. Kraus. The evolution of SharedPlans. In A. Rao and M. Wooldridge, editors, Foundations and Theories of Rational Agencies, pages 227–262. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Kinny, M. Ljungberg, A. Rao, E. Sonenberg, G. Tidhar, and E. Werner. Planned team activity. In Proceedings of the Forth European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, pages 227–256, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. J. Levesque, P. R. Cohen, and J. H. T. Nunes. On acting together. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 94–99, Boston, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Luck and M. d’Inverno. A formal framework for agency and autonomy. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 254–26. AAAI Press/The MIT Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Marsh. Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis, University of Stirling, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Marsh. Optimism and pessimism in trust. In Proceedings of the Ibero-American Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IBERAMIA’ 94), 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. M. Spivey. The Z Notation: A Reference Manual. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead, 2nd edition, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Formalizing the cooperative problem solving process. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pages 403–417, Lake Quinhalt, WA, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Cooperative problem-solving. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9(4):563–592, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Griffiths, N., Luck, M., d’Inverno, M. (2003). Annotating Cooperative Plans with Trusted Agents. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Korba, L., Singh, M. (eds) Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice. TRUST 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2631. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36609-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36609-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00988-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36609-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics