Strong Reductions and Immunity for Exponential Time | SpringerLink
Skip to main content

Strong Reductions and Immunity for Exponential Time

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 2003 (STACS 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2607))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 892 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the relation between immunity and hardness in exponential time. The idea that these concepts are related originated in computability theory where it led to Post’s program. It has been continued successfully in complexity theory [10],[14],[20]. We study three notions of immunity for exponential time. An infinite set A is called - EXP-immune, if it does not contain an infinite subset in EXP; - EXP-hyperimmune, if for every infinite sparse set B ∈ EXP and every polynomial p there is an x ∈ B such that y ∈ B : p-1(∣x∣) ≤∣y∣ ≤ p(∣x∣) is disjoint from A; - EXP-avoiding, if the intersection A∩B is finite for every sparse set B ∈ EXP.

EXP-avoiding sets are always EXP-hyperimmune and EXP-hyperimmune sets are always EXP-immune but not vice versa. We analyze with respect to which polynomial-time reducibilities these sets can be hard for EXP. EXP-immune sets cannot be conjunctively hard for EXP although they can be hard for EXP with respect to disjunctive and parity-reducibility. EXP-hyperimmunes sets cannot be hard for EXP with respect to any of these three reducibilities. There is a relativized world in which there is an EXP-avoiding set which is hard with respect to positive truth-table reducibility. Furthermore, in every relativized world there is some EXP-avoiding set which is Turing-hard for EXP.

This work was written while F. Stephan was visiting DePaul University. He was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Heisenberg grant Ste 967/1-1 and DePaul University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
JPY 3498
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
JPY 11439
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
JPY 14299
Price includes VAT (Japan)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klaus Ambos-Spies. Resource-bounded genericity. In S. B. Cooper et al., editor, Computability, Enumerability, Unsolvability, volume 224 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series, pages 1–59. Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klaus Ambos-Spies, Hans Fleischhack and Hagen Huwig. Diagonalizations over polynomial time computable sets. Theoretical Computer Science, 51:177–204, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Klaus Ambos-Spies, Hans-Christian Neis, and Sebastiaan A. Terwijn. Genericity and measure for exponential time. Theoretical Computer Science, 168:3–19, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Klaus Ambos-Spies, Sebastiaan A. Terwijn, and Xizhong Zheng. Resource bounded randomness and weakly complete problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 172:195–207, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Balcázar and José L. Simplicity, relativizations and nondeterminism. SIAM Journal on Computing, 14(1):148–157, 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. José L. Balcázar, Josep Diaz, and Joaquim Gabarró. Structural Complexity, vols. I and II. Springer, Berlin, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Richard Beigel, Martin Kummer, and Frank Stephan. Approximable sets. Information and Computation, 120:304–314, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard Berman. On the structure of complete sets: Almost everywhere complexity and infinitely often speedup. In 17th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 76–80, Houston, Texas, 25–27 October 1976. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leonard Berman and Juris Hartmanis. On isomorphisms and density of NP and other complete sets. SIAM Journal on Computing, 6(2):305–322, June 1977.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Harry Buhrman. Resource Bounded Reductions. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harry Buhrman. Complete sets are not simple. Unpublished manuscript, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leo Harrington and Robert I. Soare. Post’s program and incomplete recursively enumerable sets. Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Science, USA, 88:10242–10246, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steven Homer and Wolfgang Maass. Oracle-dependent properties of the lattice of NP-sets. Theoretical Computer Science, 24:279–289. 1983.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Juris Hartmanis, Ming Li, and Yaacov Yesha. Containment, separation, complete sets, and immunity of complexity classes. In Automata, Languages and Programming, 13th International Colloquium, volume 226 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 136–145, Rennes, France, 15–19 July 1986. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jack H. Lutz. Category and measure in complexity classes. SIAM Journal on Computing, 19:1100–1131, 1990.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jack H. Lutz. Almost everywhere high non-uniform complexity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 44:220–258, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Piergiorgio Odifreddi. Classical recursion theory. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emil Post. Recursively enumerable sets of positive integers and their decision problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 50:284–316, 1944.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Marcus Schaefer. Completeness and Incompleteness. PhD thesis, University of Chicago, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marcus Schaefer and Stephen Fenner. Simplicity and strong reductions. Available from http://www.cse.sc.edu/∼fenner/papers/simplicity.ps, 1998.

  21. Nicholas Tran. On P-immunity of nondeterministic complete sets. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on Structure in Complexity Theory 1995, pages 262–263. IEEE Computer Society Press, June 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nikolai K. Vereshchagin. NP-sets are coNP-immune relative to a random oracle. Third Israel Symposium on Theory of Computing and Systems, ISTCS 1995, Tel Aviv, Israel, January 4–6, 1995, Proceedings. pages 40–45, IEEE Computer Society,1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Christopher B. Wilson. Relativized circuit complexity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 31(2):169–181, October 1985.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schaefer, M., Stephan, F. (2003). Strong Reductions and Immunity for Exponential Time. In: Alt, H., Habib, M. (eds) STACS 2003. STACS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2607. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36494-3_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36494-3_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-00623-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36494-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics