Abstract
We give some guidelines for the choice and design of dissimilarity measures and illustrate some of them by the construction of a new dissimilarity measure between species distribution areas in biogeography. Species distribution data can be digitized as presences and absences in certain geographic units. As opposed to all measures already present in the literature, the geco coefficient introduced in the present paper takes the geographic distance between the units into account. The advantages of the new measure are illustrated by a study of the sensitivity against incomplete sampling and changes in the definition of the geographic units in two real data sets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
GORDON, A. D. (1990): Constructing Dissimilarity Measures. Journal of Classification, 7/2, 257–270.
GOWER, J. C. and LEGENDRE, P. (1986): Metric and Euclidean Properties of Dissimilarity Coefficients. Journal of Classification, 3/1, 5–48.
HAUSDORF, B., and HENNIG, C. (2003): Biotic Element Analysis in Biogeography. Systematic Biology, 52, 717–723.
HENNIG, C. and HAUSDORF, B. (2005): A Robust Distance Coefficient between Distribution Areas Incorporating Geographic Distances. To appear in Systematic Biology.
HUBERT, L. and ARABIE, P. (1985): Comparing Partitions. Journal of Classifi-cation, 2/2, 193–218.
JACCARD, P. (1901): Distribution de la florine alpine dans la Bassin de Dranses et dans quelques regiones voisines. Bulletin de la Societe Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 241–272.
KERNEY, M. P., CAMERON, R. A. D., and JUNGBLUTH, J. H. (1983): Die Landschnecken Nord-und Mitteleuropas. Parey, Hamburg and Berlin.
KULCZYNSKI, S. (1927): Die Pflanzenassoziationen der Pieninen. Bulletin International de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences et des Lettres, Classe des Sciences Mathematiques et Naturelles, B, 57–203.
MAST, A. R. and NYFELLER, R. (2003): Using a null model to recognize signifi-cant co-occurrence prior to identifying candidate areas of endemism. Systematic Biology, 52, 271–280.
PERES-NETO, P. R. and JACKSON, D. A. (2001): How well do multivariate data sets match? The advantages of a Procrustean superimposition approach over the Mantel test. Oecologia, 129, 169–178.
SHI, G. R. (1993): Multivariate data analysis in palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography-a review. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 105, 199–234.
SIMPSON, G. G. (1960): Notes on the measurement of faunal resemblance. American Journal of Science, 258-A, 300–311.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hennig, C., Hausdorf, B. (2006). Design of Dissimilarity Measures: A New Dissimilarity Between Species Distribution Areas. In: Batagelj, V., Bock, HH., Ferligoj, A., Žiberna, A. (eds) Data Science and Classification. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34416-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34415-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34416-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)