default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCID18th ICAIL 2021: São Paulo, Brazil
- Juliano Maranhão, Adam Zachary Wyner:
ICAIL '21: Eighteenth International Conference for Artificial Intelligence and Law, São Paulo Brazil, June 21 - 25, 2021. ACM 2021, ISBN 978-1-4503-8526-8 - Dennis Aumiller
, Satya Almasian, Sebastian Lackner, Michael Gertz:
Structural text segmentation of legal documents. 2-11 - Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Katie Atkinson:
Precedential constraint: the role of issues. 12-21 - Paheli Bhattacharya, Soham Poddar, Koustav Rudra, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Saptarshi Ghosh:
Incorporating domain knowledge for extractive summarization of legal case documents. 22-31 - Georg Borges:
AI systems and product liability. 32-39 - Rajaa El Hamdani, Majd Mustapha, David Restrepo Amariles, Aurore Clément Troussel, Sébastien Meeùs, Katsiaryna Krasnashchok:
A combined rule-based and machine learning approach for automated GDPR compliance checking. 40-49 - Wachara Fungwacharakorn, Kanae Tsushima, Ken Satoh:
On semantics-based minimal revision for legal reasoning. 50-59 - Lukasz Górski, Shashishekar Ramakrishna:
Explainable artificial intelligence, lawyer's perspective. 60-68 - Guido Governatori, Francesco Olivieri:
Unravel legal references in defeasible deontic logic. 69-78 - Zihan Huang, Charles Low, Mengqiu Teng, Hongyi Zhang, Daniel E. Ho, Mark S. Krass, Matthias Grabmair:
Context-aware legal citation recommendation using deep learning. 79-88 - Juliano Maranhão, Edelcio G. de Souza, Giovanni Sartor:
A dynamic model for balancing values. 89-98 - Devin J. McConnell, James Zhu, Sachin Pandya, Derek Aguiar:
Case-level prediction of motion outcomes in civil litigation. 99-108 - Malte Ostendorff, Elliott Ash, Terry Ruas, Bela Gipp, Julián Moreno Schneider, Georg Rehm:
Evaluating document representations for content-based legal literature recommendations. 109-118 - Andrew Paley, Andong L. Li Zhao, Harper Pack, Sergio Servantez, Rachel F. Adler, Marko Sterbentz, Adam R. Pah, David L. Schwartz, Cameron Barrie, Alexander Einarsson, Kristian J. Hammond:
From data to information: automating data science to explore the U.S. court system. 119-128 - Jaromír Savelka, Hannes Westermann, Karim Benyekhlef, Charlotte S. Alexander, Jayla C. Grant, David Restrepo Amariles, Rajaa El Hamdani, Sébastien Meeùs, Aurore Clément Troussel, Michal Araszkiewicz, Kevin D. Ashley, Alexandra Ashley, Karl Branting, Mattia Falduti, Matthias Grabmair, Jakub Harasta, Tereza Novotná, Elizabeth Tippett, Shiwanni Johnson:
Lex Rosetta: transfer of predictive models across languages, jurisdictions, and legal domains. 129-138 - Alice Witt, Anna Huggins, Guido Governatori, Joshua Buckley:
Converting copyright legislation into machine-executable code: interpretation, coding validation and legal alignment. 139-148 - Heng Zheng, Davide Grossi, Bart Verheij:
Hardness of case-based decisions: a formal theory. 149-158 - Lucia Zheng, Neel Guha, Brandon R. Anderson, Peter Henderson, Daniel E. Ho:
When does pretraining help?: assessing self-supervised learning for law and the CaseHOLD dataset of 53, 000+ legal holdings. 159-168 - Katie Atkinson, Joe Collenette, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou:
Practical tools from formal models: the ECHR as a case study. 170-174 - Floris Bex, Henry Prakken:
On the relevance of algorithmic decision predictors for judicial decision making. 175-179 - Roberta Calegari, Régis Riveret, Giovanni Sartor:
The burden of persuasion in structured argumentation. 180-184 - Aaron Ceross, Tingting Zhu:
Prediction of monetary penalties for data protection cases in multiple languages. 185-189 - Joshua Ellul, Gordon J. Pace, Stephen McCarthy, Trevor Sammut, Juanita Brockdorff, Matthew Scerri:
Regulating artificial intelligence: a technology regulator's perspective. 190-194 - Fernando Esteban de la Rosa, John Zeleznikow:
Making intelligent online dispute resolution tools available to self-represented litigants in the public justice system: towards and ethical use of the ai technology in the administration of justice. 195-199 - Nicolas Garneau, Eve Gaumond, Luc Lamontagne, Pierre-Luc Déziel:
Plum2Text: a french plumitifs-descriptions data-to-text dataset for natural language generation. 200-204 - Ingo Glaser, Tom Schamberger, Florian Matthes:
Anonymization of german legal court rulings. 205-209 - Marzieh Karimi-Haghighi, Carlos Castillo:
Enhancing a recidivism prediction tool with machine learning: effectiveness and algorithmic fairness. 210-214 - Livio Robaldo:
Towards compliance checking in reified I/O logic via SHACL. 215-219 - Antonino Rotolo, Clara Smith:
Modelling legal procedures. 220-224 - Aleksander Smywinski-Pohl, Mateusz Piech, Zbigniew Kaleta, Krzysztof Wróbel:
Automatic extraction of amendments from polish statutory law. 225-229 - Francesco Sovrano, Monica Palmirani, Biagio Distefano, Salvatore Sapienza, Fabio Vitali:
A dataset for evaluating legal question answering on private international law. 230-234 - Cor Steging, Silja Renooij, Bart Verheij:
Discovering the rationale of decisions: towards a method for aligning learning and reasoning. 235-239 - Adriana Jacoto Unger, José Francisco dos Santos Neto, Marcelo Fantinato, Sarajane Marques Peres, Julio Trecenti, Renata Hirota:
Process mining-enabled jurimetrics: analysis of a Brazilian court's judicial performance in the business law processing. 240-244 - Andrew Vold, Jack G. Conrad:
Using transformers to improve answer retrieval for legal questions. 245-249 - Huihui Xu, Jaromír Savelka, Kevin D. Ashley:
Toward summarizing case decisions via extracting argument issues, reasons, and conclusions. 250-254 - Nicolas Garneau, Eve Gaumond, Luc Lamontagne, Pierre-Luc Déziel:
CriminelBART: a French Canadian legal language model specialized in criminal law. 256-257 - Sieh-Chuen Huang, Hsuan-Lei Shao, Robert B. Leflar:
Applying decision tree analysis to family court decisions: factors determining child custody in Taiwan. 258-259 - Jonathan R. Mok, Wai Yin Mok, Rachel V. Mok:
Sentence classification for contract law cases: a natural language processing approach. 260-261 - Jason Morris:
Constraint answer set programming as a tool to improve legislative drafting: a rules as code experiment. 262-263 - Felipe Maia Polo, Itamar Ciochetti, Emerson Bertolo:
Predicting legal proceedings status: approaches based on sequential text data. 264-265 - Antonino Rotolo, Luciano H. Tamargo, Diego C. Martínez:
Pathways to legal dynamics in robotics. 266-267 - Olivier Salaün, Philippe Langlais, Karim Benyekhlef:
Labels distribution matters in performance achieved in legal judgment prediction tasks. 268-269 - Frederike Zufall, Rampei Kimura, Linyu Peng:
A simple mathematical model for the legal concept of balancing of interests. 270-271 - Ken Satoh, Kazuko Takahashi, Tatsuki Kawasaki:
Interactive system for arranging issues based on PROLEG in civil litigation. 273-274 - Ernest Thiessen, Graham Ross:
Live demonstration of a working collaborative enegotiation system (smartsettle infinity). 275-276 - Masaharu Yoshioka, Yasuhiro Aoki, Youta Suzuki:
BERT-based ensemble methods with data augmentation for legal textual entailment in COLIEE statute law task. 278-284 - Sabine Wehnert, Viju Sudhi, Shipra Dureja, Libin Kutty, Saijal Shahania, Ernesto William De Luca:
Legal norm retrieval with variations of the bert model combined with TF-IDF vectorization. 285-294 - Guilherme Moraes Rosa, Ruan Chaves Rodrigues, Roberto de Alencar Lotufo, Rodrigo Nogueira:
To tune or not to tune?: zero-shot models for legal case entailment. 295-300
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2025-05-02 23:41 CEST by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
