原文:
http://www.cnblogs.com/yelsea/archive/2007/06/21/792314.html
本人在vs2008中使用的结果
1.没添加那个事务那段代码的情况
- using System;
- using System.Collections.Generic;
- using System.Linq;
- using System.Text;
- using System.Data;
- using System.Data.Common;
- using System.Data.SQLite;
- using System.Diagnostics;
- namespace CApp
- {
- class Program
- {
- static void Main(string[] args)
- {
- System.IO.File.Delete("test.db");
- SQLiteConnection.CreateFile("test.db");
- DbProviderFactory factory = SQLiteFactory.Instance;
- using (DbConnection conn = factory.CreateConnection())
- {
- // 连接数据库
- conn.ConnectionString = "Data Source=test.db";
- conn.Open();
- // 创建数据表
- string sql = "create table [test1] ([id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [s] TEXT COLLATE NOCASE)";
- DbCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand();
- cmd.Connection = conn;
- cmd.CommandText = sql;
- cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
- // 添加参数
- cmd.Parameters.Add(cmd.CreateParameter());
- // 开始计时
- Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch();
- watch.Start();
- //DbTransaction trans = conn.BeginTransaction();
- //try
- //{
- // 连续插入1000条记录
- for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
- {
- cmd.CommandText = "insert into [test1] ([s]) values (?)";
- cmd.Parameters[0].Value = i.ToString();
- cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
- }
- //trans.Commit();
- //}
- //catch
- //{
- // trans.Rollback();
- // throw;
- //}
- // 停止计时
- watch.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine(watch.Elapsed);
- Console.Read();
- }
- }
- }
- }
运行结果用时:00:01:11.5081320,用了1分11秒多。
2.修改了代码后
- using System;
- using System.Collections.Generic;
- using System.Linq;
- using System.Text;
- using System.Data;
- using System.Data.Common;
- using System.Data.SQLite;
- using System.Diagnostics;
- namespace CApp
- {
- class Program
- {
- static void Main(string[] args)
- {
- System.IO.File.Delete("test.db");
- SQLiteConnection.CreateFile("test.db");
- DbProviderFactory factory = SQLiteFactory.Instance;
- using (DbConnection conn = factory.CreateConnection())
- {
- // 连接数据库
- conn.ConnectionString = "Data Source=test.db";
- conn.Open();
- // 创建数据表
- string sql = "create table [test1] ([id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [s] TEXT COLLATE NOCASE)";
- DbCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand();
- cmd.Connection = conn;
- cmd.CommandText = sql;
- cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
- // 添加参数
- cmd.Parameters.Add(cmd.CreateParameter());
- // 开始计时
- Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch();
- watch.Start();
- DbTransaction trans = conn.BeginTransaction();
- try
- {
- // 连续插入1000条记录
- for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
- {
- cmd.CommandText = "insert into [test1] ([s]) values (?)";
- cmd.Parameters[0].Value = i.ToString();
- cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
- }
- trans.Commit();
- }
- catch
- {
- trans.Rollback();
- throw;
- }
- // 停止计时
- watch.Stop();
- Console.WriteLine(watch.Elapsed);
- Console.Read();
- }
- }
- }
- }
本人机器运行结果00:00:00.0724826也就是0.07秒
机器配置:
Intel 酷睿2双核 E8400
2G内存
为什么只是简单启用了一个事务会有这么大的差距呢?很简单,SQLite 缺省为每个操作启动一个事务,那么原代码 1000 次插入起码开启了 1000 个事务,"事务开启 + SQL 执行 + 事务关闭" 自然耗费了大量的时间,这也是后面显示启动事务后为什么如此快的原因。其实这是数据库操作的基本常识,大家要紧记,不好的代码效率差的不是一点半点。
感谢原作者。