原文:
mysql的引擎常用的有两个,一个MyISAM,另一个是InnoDB,mysql默认的为MyISAM,而InnoDB才是支持事务的。所以一般需要修改下,如何修改就不说了。
事务需要依赖数据库,好久没使用声明式事务,今天试了下。关键配置如下。
< tx:advice id="transactionAdvice" transaction-manager="transactionManager">
< tx:attributes >
< tx:method name="add*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="append*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="insert*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="save*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="update*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="modify*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="edit*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="delete*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="remove*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="tx*" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="repair" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="delAndRepair" propagation="REQUIRED" />
< tx:method name="get*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
< tx:method name="find*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
< tx:method name="load*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
< tx:method name="search*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
< tx:method name="datagrid*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
< tx:method name="*" propagation="SUPPORTS" />
</ tx:attributes >
</ tx:advice >
< aop:config >
< aop:pointcut id="transactionPointcut" expression="execution(* com.wondersgroup.employeeBenefits.*.*.service..*Impl.*(..))" />
<!-- com.wondersgroup.benefit.*.core.service..*Impl.*(..) -->
< aop:advisor pointcut-ref="transactionPointcut" advice-ref="transactionAdvice" />
</ aop:config >
|
事务配置好之后再service中手动抛了个exception,结果没有回滚,service方法如下
@Override
public int saveBudgetApplyInfo(BudgetApplyInfo budgetApplyInfo) throws Exception {
budgetApplyInfoMapper.insert(budgetApplyInfo);
if ( 1 == 1 ){
throw new Exception();
}
return 1 ;
}
|
跟着断点一步步进去查看原因
在
TransactionAspectSupport中发现这样一个方法
/**
* Handle a throwable, completing the transaction.
* We may commit or roll back, depending on the configuration.
* @param txInfo information about the current transaction
* @param ex throwable encountered
*/
protected void completeTransactionAfterThrowing(TransactionInfo txInfo, Throwable ex) {
if (txInfo != null && txInfo.hasTransaction()) {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace( "Completing transaction for [" + txInfo.getJoinpointIdentification() +
"] after exception: " + ex);
}
if (txInfo.transactionAttribute.rollbackOn(ex)) {
try {
txInfo.getTransactionManager().rollback(txInfo.getTransactionStatus());
}
catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by rollback exception" , ex);
ex2.initApplicationException(ex);
throw ex2;
}
catch (RuntimeException ex2) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by rollback exception" , ex);
throw ex2;
}
catch (Error err) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by rollback error" , ex);
throw err;
}
}
else {
// We don't roll back on this exception.
// Will still roll back if TransactionStatus.isRollbackOnly() is true.
try {
txInfo.getTransactionManager().commit(txInfo.getTransactionStatus());
}
catch (TransactionSystemException ex2) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by commit exception" , ex);
ex2.initApplicationException(ex);
throw ex2;
}
catch (RuntimeException ex2) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by commit exception" , ex);
throw ex2;
}
catch (Error err) {
logger.error( "Application exception overridden by commit error" , ex);
throw err;
}
}
}
}
|
上面的方法中有这么一段
txInfo.transactionAttribute.rollbackOn(ex),这里是判断是否需要执行回滚操作的,跟踪rollbackOn方法最后会执行到
|
DefaultTransactionAttribute中的rollbackOn方法
/**
* The default behavior is as with EJB: rollback on unchecked exception.
* Additionally attempt to rollback on Error.
* <p>This is consistent with TransactionTemplate's default behavior.
*/
public boolean rollbackOn(Throwable ex) {
return (ex instanceof RuntimeException || ex instanceof Error);
}
|
看到这里,应该都清楚了。。。自己主动抛异常Exception是不对的。这里只捕获运行时异常
RuntimeException 及Error,所以我们测试时不可以直接抛Exception,而应该换成
|
RuntimeException 。当然。也可在xml中指定rollback- for
|
< tx:method name="add*" propagation="REQUIRED" rollback-for="Exception" />
|
最后:个人还是比较喜欢基于注解的事务处理
如果还不行,请接着看下面这篇:
最近做一个项目,项目的框架采用是Spring3MVC+MyBatis3.1。可是在开发过程中发现配置的事务不管用。
出现这个问题的现象是用Junit调试事务管用,而部署到Tomcat中就不管用了。先看看事务的配置:
<!--proxy-target-class="true"强制使用cglib代理 如果为false则spring会自动选择-->
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy proxy-target-class="true"/><!-- Transaction manager for a single JDBC DataSource -->
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" />
</bean>
<tx:advice id="txAdvice" transaction-manager="transactionManager">
<tx:attributes>
<tx:method name="save*" propagation="REQUIRED"/>
</tx:attributes>
</tx:advice>
<aop:config>
<aop:pointcut expression="execution(public * com.luyou.platform.service.impl.*Impl.*(..))" id="pointcut"/>
<aop:advisor advice-ref="txAdvice" pointcut-ref="pointcut"/>
</aop:config>
采用以下两种方法调试:
一、Debug视图
1、Junit下的
发现配置事务的AOP已经包进来了。再看看Tomcat中运行的Debug截图:
显然AOP没有被包进来。
二、Log4J的记录:
Junit下的记录:
Spring托管了事务。
Tomcat运行时的记录:
Spring没有托管事务。
从以上两种方法的调试说明了,事务的配置是正确的,只是在部署到Tomcat中,没有被托管。为什么会在Junit的时候就可以呢?得看看Junit的配置:
@RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
@TestExecutionListeners({DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener.class})
@ContextConfiguration("classpath:applicationContext.xml")
这是Junit加载Spring容器的注解。ContextConfiguration会把applicationContext.xml的Bean都加载了,这就说明Tomcat在运行时没有将applicationContext.xml的Bean加载进来。问了前辈,前辈的回话是这样的:
切面配置在了root applicationContext的bean上了,而spring mvc会根据xxx-servelt.xml生成一个自己的applicationContext,他的父applicationContext为root applicatonContext,当mvc有自己的bean时便不再去向父context要bean,导致声明事务无效。
看了前辈的这个邮件,我将applicationContext.xml中配置事务的AOP复制到XXX-servlet.xml中。再调试,Tomcat中运行项目事务被Spring托管了,也就是问题解决了!!
问题解决后查看了Spring3.1的Docs发现了以下的内容:
These inherited beans can be overridden in the servlet-specific scope, and you can define new scope-specific beans local to a given Servlet instance.
Context hierarchy in Spring Web MVC Upon initialization of a DispatcherServlet, Spring MVC looks for a file named [servlet-name]-servlet.xml in the WEB-INF directory of your web application and creates the beans defined there, overriding the definitions of any beans defined with the same name in the global scope.