{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,12,30]],"date-time":"2024-12-30T19:04:57Z","timestamp":1735585497662},"reference-count":78,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1642636800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1642636800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006764","name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Berlin","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006764","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>\n Objectives<\/jats:title>\n To systematically review studies using machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict whether patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty achieve an improvement as high or higher than the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) (classification problem).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n Methods<\/jats:title>\n Studies were eligible to be included in the review if they collected PROMs both pre- and postintervention, reported the method of MCID calculation and applied ML. ML was defined as a family of models which automatically learn from data when selecting features, identifying nonlinear relations or interactions. Predictive performance must have been assessed using common metrics. Studies were searched on MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library. Study selection and risk of bias assessment (ROB) was conducted by two independent researchers.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n Results<\/jats:title>\n 517 studies were eligible for title and abstract screening. After screening title and abstract, 18 studies qualified for full-text screening. Finally, six studies were included. The most commonly applied ML algorithms were random forest and gradient boosting. Overall, eleven different ML algorithms have been applied in all papers. All studies reported at least fair predictive performance, with two reporting excellent performance. Sample size varied widely across studies, with 587 to 34,110 individuals observed. PROMs also varied widely across studies, with sixteen applied to TKA and six applied to THA. There was no single PROM utilized commonly in all studies. All studies calculated MCIDs for PROMs based on anchor-based or distribution-based methods or referred to literature which did so. Five studies reported variable importance for their models. Two studies were at high risk of bias.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n Discussion<\/jats:title>\n No ML model was identified to perform best at the problem stated, nor can any PROM said to be best predictable. Reporting standards must be improved to reduce risk of bias and improve comparability to other studies.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T03:04:52Z","timestamp":1642647892000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["Can minimal clinically important differences in patient reported outcome measures be predicted by machine learning in patients with total knee or hip arthroplasty? A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1186","volume":"22","author":[{"given":"Benedikt","family":"Langenberger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Thoma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Verena","family":"Vogt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"1751_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0040-1702189","author":"CA Kahlenberg","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kahlenberg CA, Richardson SS, Gruskay JA, Cross MB. Trends in utilization of total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Knee Surg. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0040-1702189.","journal-title":"J Knee Surg"},{"key":"1751_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000687","volume":"477","author":"MA Fontana","year":"2019","unstructured":"Fontana MA, Lyman S, Sarker GK, Padgett DE, MacLean CH. Can machine learning algorithms predict which patients will achieve minimally clinically important differences from total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477:1267\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000687.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR3","volume-title":"Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators","author":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development","year":"2015","unstructured":"Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015."},{"key":"1751_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1177\/1120700018757940","volume":"28","author":"C Pabinger","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pabinger C, Lothaller H, Portner N, Geissler A. Projections of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries up to 2050. Hip Int. 2018;28:498\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120700018757940.","journal-title":"Hip Int"},{"key":"1751_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1664","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2015.05.008","volume":"23","author":"C Pabinger","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pabinger C, Lothaller H, Geissler A. Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 2015;23:1664\u201373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joca.2015.05.008.","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartil"},{"key":"1751_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2014.12.022","volume":"23","author":"D Culliford","year":"2015","unstructured":"Culliford D, Maskell J, Judge A, Cooper C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 2015;23:594\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joca.2014.12.022.","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartil"},{"key":"1751_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2018.1446463","volume":"89","author":"V Pilz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Pilz V, Hanstein T, Skripitz R. Projections of primary hip arthroplasty in Germany until 2040. Acta Orthop. 2018;89:308\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2018.1446463.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"1751_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1622","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001214","volume":"478","author":"M Rupp","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rupp M, Lau E, Kurtz SM, Alt V. Projections of primary TKA and THA in Germany from 2016 through 2040. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:1622\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000001214.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR9","first-page":"82","volume":"127","author":"G Hooper","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hooper G, Lee AJJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Current trends and projections in the utilisation rates of hip and knee replacement in New Zealand from 2001 to 2026. N Z Med J. 2014;127:82\u201393.","journal-title":"N Z Med J"},{"key":"1751_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2014.913224","volume":"85","author":"S Nemes","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nemes S, Gordon M, Rogmark C, Rolfson O. Projections of total hip replacement in Sweden from 2013 to 2030. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:238\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2014.913224.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"1751_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.3109\/17453674.2015.1034608","volume":"86","author":"S Nemes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nemes S, Rolfson O, W-Dahl A, Garellick G, Sundberg M, K\u00e4rrholm J, Robertsson O. Historical view and future demand for knee arthroplasty in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:426\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/17453674.2015.1034608.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"1751_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.35170","volume":"97-B","author":"A Patel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Patel A, Pavlou G, M\u00fajica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:1076\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/0301-620X.97B8.35170.","journal-title":"Bone Joint J"},{"key":"1751_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1455","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.17.01617","volume":"100","author":"M Sloan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S. 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100:1455\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.17.01617.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"1751_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1134","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.170990","volume":"46","author":"JA Singh","year":"2019","unstructured":"Singh JA, Yu S, Chen L, Cleveland JD. Rates of total joint replacement in the United States: future projections to 2020\u20132040 using the national inpatient sample. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:1134\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3899\/jrheum.170990.","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"1751_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2130","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-017-5377-7","volume":"475","author":"MCS Inacio","year":"2017","unstructured":"Inacio MCS, Graves SE, Pratt NL, Roughead EE, Nemes S. Increase in total joint arthroplasty projected from 2014 to 2046 in australia: a conservative local model with international implications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:2130\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-017-5377-7.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcma.2015.06.005","volume":"78","author":"A Kumar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kumar A, Tsai W-C, Tan T-S, Kung P-T, Chiu L-T, Ku M-C. Temporal trends in primary and revision total knee and hip replacement in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015;78:538\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcma.2015.06.005.","journal-title":"J Chin Med Assoc"},{"key":"1751_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2415","DOI":"10.3899\/jrheum.080295","volume":"35","author":"R Gandhi","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:2415\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3899\/jrheum.080295.","journal-title":"J Rheumatol"},{"key":"1751_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"g7818","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.g7818","volume":"350","author":"EC Nelson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nelson EC, Eftimovska E, Lind C, Hager A, Wasson JH, Lindblad S. Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2015;350:g7818. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.g7818.","journal-title":"BMJ (Clinical Research ed.)"},{"key":"1751_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1302\/2046-3758.47.2000380","volume":"4","author":"PN Ramkumar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ramkumar PN, Harris JD, Noble PC. Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Bone Joint Res. 2015;4:120\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1302\/2046-3758.47.2000380.","journal-title":"Bone Joint Res"},{"key":"1751_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00038","volume":"6","author":"JJ Gagnier","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gagnier JJ, Huang H, Mullins M, Marinac-Dabi\u0107 D, Ghambaryan A, Eloff B, et al. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2018;6:e2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.17.00038.","journal-title":"JBJS Rev"},{"key":"1751_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.2147\/PROM.S97774","volume":"7","author":"K Harris","year":"2016","unstructured":"Harris K, Dawson J, Gibbons E, Lim CR, Beard DJ, Fitzpatrick R, Price AJ. Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;7:101\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2147\/PROM.S97774.","journal-title":"Patient Relat Outcome Meas"},{"key":"1751_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"407","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6","volume":"10","author":"R Jaeschke","year":"1989","unstructured":"Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0197-2456(89)90005-6.","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"1751_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1342","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2014.13128","volume":"312","author":"AE McGlothlin","year":"2014","unstructured":"McGlothlin AE, Lewis RJ. Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014;312:1342\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2014.13128.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"1751_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2006.09.001","volume":"15","author":"A Escobar","year":"2007","unstructured":"Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Ar\u00f3stegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 2007;15:273\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joca.2006.09.001.","journal-title":"Osteoarthritis Cartil"},{"key":"1751_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"582","DOI":"10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C","volume":"41","author":"GR Norman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"1751_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-016-4770-y","volume":"475","author":"JL Berliner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Berliner JL, Brodke DJ, Chan V, SooHoo NF, Bozic KJ. Can preoperative patient-reported outcome measures be used to predict meaningful improvement in function after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:149\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-016-4770-y.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.07.026","volume":"36","author":"AHS Harris","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harris AHS, Kuo AC, Bowe TR, Manfredi L, Lalani NF, Giori NJ. Can machine learning methods produce accurate and easy-to-use preoperative prediction models of one-year improvements in pain and functioning after knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:112-117.e6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.07.026.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"1751_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-018-0731-6","volume":"19","author":"M Huber","year":"2019","unstructured":"Huber M, Kurz C, Leidl R. Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19:3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-018-0731-6.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"},{"key":"1751_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2119","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.03.019","volume":"35","author":"KN Kunze","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kunze KN, Karhade AV, Sadauskas AJ, Schwab JH, Levine BR. Development of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically meaningful improvement for the patient-reported health state after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:2119\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.03.019.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"1751_CR30","unstructured":"Russell SJ, Norvig P, Davis E, Edwards D. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Boston, Columbus, Indianapolis, New York, San Francisco, Upper Saddle River, Amsterdam, Cape Town, Dubai, London, Madrid, Milan, Munich, Paris, Montreal, Toronto, Delhi, Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Sydney, Hong Kong, Seoul, Singapore, Taipei, Tokyo: Pearson; 2016."},{"key":"1751_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1093\/neuros\/nyx384","volume":"83","author":"JT Senders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Arnaout O, Karhade AV, Dasenbrock HH, Gormley WB, Broekman ML, Smith TR. Natural and artificial intelligence in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2018;83:181\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/neuros\/nyx384.","journal-title":"Neurosurgery"},{"key":"1751_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1136\/jnnp-2014-307807","volume":"86","author":"P Azimi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Montazeri A. Artificial neural networks in neurosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:251\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jnnp-2014-307807.","journal-title":"J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry"},{"key":"1751_CR33","first-page":"173","volume":"60","author":"P Azimi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Azimi P, Benzel EC, Shahzadi S, Azhari S, Mohammadi HR. The prediction of successful surgery outcome in lumbar disc herniation based on artificial neural networks. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;60:173\u20137.","journal-title":"J Neurosurg Sci"},{"key":"1751_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.09.149","volume":"109","author":"JT Senders","year":"2018","unstructured":"Senders JT, Staples PC, Karhade AV, Zaki MM, Gormley WB, Broekman MLD, et al. Machine learning and neurosurgical outcome prediction: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:476-486.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wneu.2017.09.149.","journal-title":"World Neurosurg"},{"key":"1751_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-84858-7","volume-title":"The elements of statistical learning","author":"T Hastie","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning. New York: Springer; 2009."},{"key":"1751_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.1136\/svn-2017-000101","volume":"2","author":"F Jiang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, Dong Y, Li H, Ma S, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2:230\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/svn-2017-000101.","journal-title":"Stroke Vasc Neurol"},{"key":"1751_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bimj.201300226","author":"AL Boulesteix","year":"2014","unstructured":"Boulesteix AL, Schmid M. Machine learning versus statistical modeling. Biom J. 2014. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bimj.201300226.","journal-title":"Biom J"},{"key":"1751_CR38","first-page":"1263","volume":"21","author":"H He","year":"2008","unstructured":"He H, Garcia EA. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2008;21:1263\u201384.","journal-title":"IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng"},{"key":"1751_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1317","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2017.18391","volume":"319","author":"AL Beam","year":"2018","unstructured":"Beam AL, Kohane IS. Big data and machine learning in health care. JAMA. 2018;319:1317\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2017.18391.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"1751_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1214\/ss\/1009213726","volume":"16","author":"L Breiman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Breiman L. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat Sci. 2001;16:199\u2013231.","journal-title":"Stat Sci"},{"key":"1751_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1038\/s41380-020-0825-2","volume":"26","author":"M Bracher-Smith","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bracher-Smith M, Crawford K, Escott-Price V. Machine learning for genetic prediction of psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:70\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41380-020-0825-2.","journal-title":"Mol Psychiatry"},{"key":"1751_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004","author":"E Christodoulou","year":"2019","unstructured":"Christodoulou E, Ma J, Collins GS, Steyerberg EW, Verbakel JY, van Calster B. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"1751_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1007\/s00134-019-05872-y","volume":"46","author":"LM Fleuren","year":"2020","unstructured":"Fleuren LM, Klausch TLT, Zwager CL, Schoonmade LJ, Guo T, Roggeveen LF, et al. Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:383\u2013400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00134-019-05872-y.","journal-title":"Intensive Care Med"},{"key":"1751_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jad.2018.08.073","volume":"241","author":"Y Lee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lee Y, Ragguett R-M, Mansur RB, Boutilier JJ, Rosenblat JD, Trevizol A, et al. Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict therapeutic outcomes in depression: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:519\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jad.2018.08.073.","journal-title":"J Affect Disord"},{"key":"1751_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"W1","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1377","volume":"170","author":"KGM Moons","year":"2019","unstructured":"Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:W1\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M18-1377.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"1751_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-007-9295-0","volume":"17","author":"JM Valderas","year":"2008","unstructured":"Valderas JM, Kotzeva A, Espallargues M, Guyatt G, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, et al. The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:179\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-007-9295-0.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"1751_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.7326\/M18-1376","volume":"170","author":"RF Wolff","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, et al. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:51\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M18-1376.","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"1751_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.11.027","volume":"37","author":"KN Kunze","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kunze KN, Polce EM, Rasio J, Nho SJ. Machine learning algorithms predict clinically significant improvements in satisfaction after hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021;37:1143\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arthro.2020.11.027.","journal-title":"Arthroscopy"},{"key":"1751_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546520988021","volume":"49","author":"PN Ramkumar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ramkumar PN, Karnuta JM, Haeberle HS, Owusu-Akyaw KA, Warner TS, Rodeo SA, et al. Association between preoperative mental health and clinically meaningful outcomes after osteochondral allograft for cartilage defects of the knee: a machine learning analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:948\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546520988021.","journal-title":"Am J Sports Med"},{"key":"1751_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1016\/j.medengphy.2020.12.007","volume":"89","author":"RA Bloomfield","year":"2021","unstructured":"Bloomfield RA, Broberg JS, Williams HA, Lanting BA, McIsaac KA, Teeter MG. Machine learning and wearable sensors at preoperative assessments: functional recovery prediction to set realistic expectations for knee replacements. Med Eng Phys. 2021;89:14\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.medengphy.2020.12.007.","journal-title":"Med Eng Phys"},{"key":"1751_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-019-1237-3","volume":"17","author":"J Felix","year":"2019","unstructured":"Felix J, Becker C, Vogl M, Buschner P, Pl\u00f6tz W, Leidl R. Patient characteristics and valuation changes impact quality of life and satisfaction in total knee arthroplasty\u2014results from a German prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-019-1237-3.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"1751_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1414","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.24614","volume":"38","author":"P Jayakumar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jayakumar P, Bozic KJ. Advanced decision-making using patient-reported outcome measures in total joint replacement. J Orthop Res. 2020;38:1414\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.24614.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"1751_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1080\/17453674.2018.1560647","volume":"90","author":"YH Pua","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pua YH, Poon CLL, Seah FJT, Thumboo J, Clark RA, Tan MH, et al. Predicting individual knee range of motion, knee pain, and walking limitation outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2019;90:179\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17453674.2018.1560647.","journal-title":"Acta Orthop"},{"key":"1751_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1016\/j.knee.2021.08.029","volume":"33","author":"J Twiggs","year":"2021","unstructured":"Twiggs J, Miles B, Roe J, Fritsch B, Liu D, Parker D, et al. Can TKA outcomes be predicted with computational simulation? Generation of a patient specific planning tool. Knee. 2021;33:38\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.knee.2021.08.029.","journal-title":"Knee"},{"key":"1751_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1091","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.M.00957","volume":"96","author":"AJ Hart","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hart AJ, Sabah SA, Sampson B, Skinner JA, Powell JJ, Palla L, et al. Surveillance of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and total hip prostheses: a prospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between blood metal ion levels and implant failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:1091\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.M.00957.","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"1751_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2313","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2019.05.044","volume":"34","author":"KR Stiegel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stiegel KR, Lash JG, Peace AJ, Coleman MM, Harrington MA, Cahill CW. Early experience and results using patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scores in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:2313\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2019.05.044.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"1751_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4909561","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/4909561","volume":"2019","author":"M Weber","year":"2019","unstructured":"Weber M, Zeman F, Craiovan B, Thieme M, Kaiser M, Woerner M, et al. Predicting outcome after total hip arthroplasty: the role of preoperative patient-reported measures. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:4909561. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2019\/4909561.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"1751_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2458","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arth.2020.04.034","volume":"35","author":"MGH Yeo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yeo MGH, Goh GS, Chen JY, Lo N-N, Yeo S-J, Liow MHL. Are Oxford hip score and western ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index useful predictors of clinical meaningful improvement and satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:2458\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.arth.2020.04.034.","journal-title":"J Arthroplasty"},{"key":"1751_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.25125","author":"A Katakam","year":"2021","unstructured":"Katakam A, Karhade AV, Collins A, Shin D, Bragdon C, Chen AF, et al. Development of machine learning algorithms to predict achievement of minimal clinically important difference for the KOOS-PS following total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.25125.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"1751_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-021-06642-4","author":"S Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang S, Lau BPH, Ng YH, Wang X, Chua W. Machine learning algorithms do not outperform preoperative thresholds in predicting clinically meaningful improvements after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00167-021-06642-4.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc"},{"key":"1751_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"308","DOI":"10.1080\/01621459.2000.10473930","volume":"95","author":"MS Pepe","year":"2000","unstructured":"Pepe MS. Receiver operating characteristic methodology. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000;95:308\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01621459.2000.10473930.","journal-title":"J Am Stat Assoc"},{"key":"1751_CR62","volume-title":"Applied logistic regression","author":"DW Hosmer","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2010.","edition":"2"},{"key":"1751_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3","volume":"3","author":"WJ Youden","year":"1950","unstructured":"Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1097-0142(1950)3:1%3c32::aid-cncr2820030106%3e3.0.co;2-3.","journal-title":"Cancer"},{"key":"1751_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.53.1.46","volume":"53","author":"C Jenkinson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jenkinson C, Stewart-Brown S, Petersen S, Paice C. Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1999;53:46\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jech.53.1.46.","journal-title":"J Epidemiol Commun Health"},{"key":"1751_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.23739","volume":"36","author":"M Hung","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hung M, Saltzman CL, Greene T, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, Gu Y, et al. Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: the HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT. J Orthop Res. 2018;36:1178\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.23739.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"1751_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-017-0003-8","volume":"1","author":"RD Hays","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hays RD, Schalet BD, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Two-item PROMIS\u00ae global physical and mental health scales. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1:2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-017-0003-8.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"1751_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012","volume":"61","author":"D Revicki","year":"2008","unstructured":"Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:102\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"1751_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-137","volume":"14","author":"T van der Ploeg","year":"2014","unstructured":"van der Ploeg T, Austin PC, Steyerberg EW. Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-14-137.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"1751_CR69","unstructured":"NHS England. The national patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) programme 2018."},{"key":"1751_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.1109\/ACII.2013.47","volume":"2013","author":"LA Jeni","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jeni LA, Cohn JF, La Torre F. Facing imbalanced data recommendations for the use of performance metrics. Int Conf Affect Comput Intell Interact Workshops. 2013;2013:245\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ACII.2013.47.","journal-title":"Int Conf Affect Comput Intell Interact Workshops"},{"key":"1751_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"932","DOI":"10.1007\/s00330-014-3487-0","volume":"25","author":"S Halligan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:932\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00330-014-3487-0.","journal-title":"Eur Radiol"},{"key":"1751_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3273","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-020-02577-4","volume":"29","author":"M Tew","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tew M, Dalziel K, Clarke P, Smith A, Choong PF, Dowsey M. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): can they be used to guide patient-centered care and optimize outcomes in total knee replacement? Qual Life Res. 2020;29:3273\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-020-02577-4.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"1751_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1186\/s43019-020-00038-3","volume":"32","author":"S Maredupaka","year":"2020","unstructured":"Maredupaka S, Meshram P, Chatte M, Kim WH, Kim TK. Minimal clinically important difference of commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in total knee arthroplasty: review of terminologies, methods and proposed values. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020;32:19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s43019-020-00038-3.","journal-title":"Knee Surg Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2005","DOI":"10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000444","volume":"476","author":"ND Clement","year":"2018","unstructured":"Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference for the WOMAC index after TKA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:2005\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/CORR.0000000000000444.","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1751_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"104510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2021.104510","volume":"153","author":"F Cabitza","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cabitza F, Campagner A. The need to separate the wheat from the chaff in medical informatics: introducing a comprehensive checklist for the (self)-assessment of medical AI studies. Int J Med Inform. 2021;153:104510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijmedinf.2021.104510.","journal-title":"Int J Med Inform"},{"key":"1751_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2078","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-019-05645-z","volume":"64","author":"D Shung","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shung D, Simonov M, Gentry M, Au B, Laine L. Machine learning to predict outcomes in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2019;64:2078\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10620-019-05645-z.","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"key":"1751_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-2-115","volume":"2","author":"WM Bramer","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer B, Anderson P. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2013;2:115. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/2046-4053-2-115.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"1751_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6947-13-7","volume":"13","author":"J-F Gehanno","year":"2013","unstructured":"Gehanno J-F, Rollin L, Darmoni S. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6947-13-7.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inform Decis Mak"}],"container-title":["BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]],"date-time":"2022-01-20T03:05:01Z","timestamp":1642647901000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com\/articles\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"references-count":78,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,12]]}},"alternative-id":["1751"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-022-01751-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1472-6947"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1472-6947","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 June 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"All authors affirm that they have no competing interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}],"article-number":"18"}}