{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,6]],"date-time":"2024-10-06T04:14:21Z","timestamp":1728188061051},"reference-count":20,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]],"date-time":"2020-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1593561600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"funder":[{"name":"H2020 SwafS","award":["741716"]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Big Data & Society"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"abstract":" Ethics has powerful teeth, but these are barely being used in the ethics of AI today \u2013 it is no wonder the ethics of AI is then blamed for having no teeth. This article argues that \u2018ethics\u2019 in the current AI ethics field is largely ineffective, trapped in an \u2018ethical principles\u2019 approach and as such particularly prone to manipulation, especially by industry actors. Using ethics as a substitute for law risks its abuse and misuse. This significantly limits what ethics can achieve and is a great loss to the AI field and its impacts on individuals and society. This article discusses these risks and then highlights the teeth of ethics and the essential value they can \u2013 and should \u2013 bring to AI ethics now. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/2053951720942541","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,22]],"date-time":"2020-07-22T12:34:41Z","timestamp":1595421281000},"update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":113,"title":["AI ethics should not remain toothless!<\/i> A call to bring back the teeth of ethics"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"7","author":[{"ORCID":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0461-0506","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ana\u00efs","family":"Ress\u00e9guier","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Trilateral Research Ltd, Waterford, Ireland"}]},{"given":"Rowena","family":"Rodrigues","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Trilateral Research Ltd, London, UK"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0031819100037943"},{"key":"bibr2-2053951720942541","unstructured":"Article 19 (2019) Governance with teeth: How human rights can strengthen FAT and ethics initiatives on artificial intelligence. Available at: https:\/\/www.article19.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/Governance-with-teeth_A19_April_2019.pdf (accessed 18 February 2020)."},{"key":"bibr3-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-60648-4"},{"key":"bibr4-2053951720942541","unstructured":"European Committee for Standardization (2017) CEN Workshop Agreement: Ethics assessment for research and innovation \u2013 Part 2: Ethical impact assessment framework (by the SATORI project). Available at: https:\/\/satoriproject.eu\/media\/CWA17145-23d2017 (accessed 13 July 2020) ."},{"key":"bibr5-2053951720942541","unstructured":"European Parliament JURI (April 2020) Framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, draft report (2020\/2012(INL)). Available at: https:\/\/oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu\/oeil\/popups\/ficheprocedure.do?lang=&reference=2020\/2012 (accessed 13 July 2020)."},{"key":"bibr6-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-019-00354-x"},{"volume-title":"In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women\u2019s Development","year":"1982","author":"Gilligan C","key":"bibr7-2053951720942541"},{"key":"bibr8-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Greene D, Hoffmann A, Stark L (2019) Better, nicer, clearer, fairer: A critical assessment of the movement for ethical artificial intelligence and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, Hawaii, 2019, pp.2122\u20132131.","DOI":"10.24251\/HICSS.2019.258"},{"key":"bibr9-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-020-09517-8"},{"key":"bibr10-2053951720942541","unstructured":"High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Available at: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/digital-single-market\/en\/news\/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai"},{"key":"bibr11-2053951720942541","unstructured":"Jansen P, Brey P, Fox A, Maas J, Hillas B, Wagner N, Smith P, Oluoch I, Lamers L, van Gein H, Resseguier A, Rodrigues R, Wright D, Douglas D (2019) Ethical analysis of AI and robotics technologies. August, SIENNA D4.4, https:\/\/www.sienna-project.eu\/digitalAssets\/801\/c_801912-l_1-k_d4.4_ethical-analysis\u2013ai-and-r\u2013with-acknowledgements.pdf (accessed 13 July 2020)."},{"key":"bibr12-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0088-2"},{"key":"bibr13-2053951720942541","unstructured":"Kl\u00f6ver C, Fanta A (2019) No red lines: Industry defuses ethics guidelines for artificial intelligence. Available at: https:\/\/algorithmwatch.org\/en\/industry-defuses-ethics-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence\/"},{"key":"bibr14-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/gfpj201334219"},{"key":"bibr15-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/09505431.2011.576240"},{"key":"bibr16-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s42256-019-0114-4"},{"key":"bibr17-2053951720942541","unstructured":"Ochigame R (2019) The invention of \u201cEthical AI\u201d how big tech manipulates academia to avoid regulation. The Intercept. Available at: https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2019\/12\/20\/mit-ethical-ai-artificial-intelligence\/?comments=1"},{"key":"bibr18-2053951720942541","unstructured":"Rodrigues R, Ress\u00e9guier A (2019) The underdog in the AI ethical and legal debate: Human autonomy. In: Ethics Dialogues. Available at: https:\/\/www.ethicsdialogues.eu\/2019\/06\/12\/the-underdog-in-the-ai-ethical-and-legal-debate-human-autonomy\/"},{"volume-title":"Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care","year":"1993","author":"Tronto J","key":"bibr19-2053951720942541"},{"key":"bibr20-2053951720942541","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvhrd092.18"}],"container-title":["Big Data & Society"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/2053951720942541","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/2053951720942541","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/2053951720942541","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,10,5]],"date-time":"2024-10-05T10:36:54Z","timestamp":1728124614000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/2053951720942541"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"references-count":20,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/2053951720942541"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2053951720942541","relation":{},"ISSN":["2053-9517","2053-9517"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2053-9517"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2053-9517"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]}}}