{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,1]],"date-time":"2023-01-01T06:06:36Z","timestamp":1672553196866},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]],"date-time":"2018-03-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1522195200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]]},"abstract":"The requirements engineering (RE) process and resultant requirements usually inform and interact with downstream (e.g., design and testing) and side-stream (e.g., project management, quality management) processes in various ways. Each of these processes involves numerous internal stakeholders (e.g., managers, developers, architects, etc.) who, in turn, have different concerns with regard to the impact of requirements on their respective processes. In other words, the various stakeholders need different types of requirements information and measurements in order for them to manage, control, and track their respective process activities (e.g., design traceability information for architects, requirements progress for project managers, etc.). The burden of providing this information usually falls within the realm of the requirements management process. However, due to the lack of identified metrics and analytical methods, the process of providing the various stakeholders with the information that addresses their various concerns becomes cumbersome. This is further complicated by large project sizes, numerous stakeholders, time pressure, large numbers of requirements, other software artifacts, and others. This proposal aims to address this problem by proposing to provide stakeholders with concern-driven requirements analytics that will address their various concerns. We intend to achieve this through identifying metrics and analytical methods that can be readily used in the requirements management process. We further propose to provide the stakeholder with a dashboard that allows them to choose from the various requirements analytics options along with visualization techniques that would best visualize the data and address their concerns.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/3178315.3178324","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,30]],"date-time":"2018-03-30T12:19:12Z","timestamp":1522412352000},"page":"1-6","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Stakeholder Concern-Driven Requirements Analytics"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Ibtehal","family":"Noorwali","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ambriola V. and Gervasi V. 2000. Process metrics for requirements analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2000). Ambriola V. and Gervasi V. 2000. Process metrics for requirements analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (2000).","DOI":"10.1007\/BFb0095017"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Basili V. et al. 2014. Aligning Organizations Through Measurement. Springer. Basili V. et al. 2014. Aligning Organizations Through Measurement. Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-05047-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","unstructured":"Basili V. et al. 1994. Goal Question Metric Approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Basili V. et al. 1994. Goal Question Metric Approach. Encyclopedia of Software Engineering."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1134285.1134348"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1021\/ac901335x"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 5th National Conference.","author":"Bokhari M.","year":"2011"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buse R.P.L. and Zimmermann T. 2012. Information Needs for Software Development Analytics. (2012) 987--996. Buse R.P.L. and Zimmermann T. 2012. Information Needs for Software Development Analytics. (2012) 987--996.","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSE.2012.6227122"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/VAST.2007.4389009"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0164-1212(94)00127-9"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_10_1","unstructured":"Creswell J.W. and Plano Clark V.L. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications. Creswell J.W. and Plano Clark V.L. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/32.177365"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fenton N.E. and Bieman J. 2015. Software Metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. CRC Press. Fenton N.E. and Bieman J. 2015. Software Metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. CRC Press.","DOI":"10.1201\/b17461"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2013.85"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.270"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_15_1","volume-title":"Goal Orientation: A Paradigm Shift for Requirements Engineering. Radical Innovations of Software and Systems Engineering in the Future.","author":"van Lamsweerde A.","year":"2004"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.17763\/haer.62.3.8323320856251826"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2013.86"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/2.241424"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_19_1","unstructured":"QSR Nvivo 11: http:\/\/www.qsrinternational.com\/. QSR Nvivo 11: http:\/\/www.qsrinternational.com\/."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_20_1","volume-title":"Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering. 2002--Janua","author":"Rashid A.","year":"2002"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-008-9102-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_22_1","volume-title":"Australian Workshop on Requirements Engineering. (2002","author":"Sarkar P.K.","year":"2009"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5555\/590564.590580"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_24_1","unstructured":"Yu E.S. 1995. Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. University of Toronto. Yu E.S. 1995. Modelling Strategic Relationships for Process Reengineering. University of Toronto."}],"container-title":["ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/3178315.3178324","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,31]],"date-time":"2022-12-31T19:48:19Z","timestamp":1672516099000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/3178315.3178324"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/3178315.3178324"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3178315.3178324","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5948"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0163-5948","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2018,3,28]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2018-03-28","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}