{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,31]],"date-time":"2022-12-31T05:24:34Z","timestamp":1672464274230},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]],"date-time":"2014-12-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1417996800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.acm.org\/publications\/policies\/copyright_policy#Background"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["dl.acm.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]]},"abstract":"The 95th percentile method for calculating a customer's billable transit volume has been the industry standard used by transit providers for over a decade due to its simplicity. We recently showed [1] that 95th percentile billing can be unfair, in that it does not reflect a customer's contribution to the provider's peak load. The 95th percentile method is also inflexible, as it does not allow a provider to offer incentives to customers that contribute minimally to the provider's peak load. In this paper we propose a new transit billing optimization framework that is fair, flexible and computationally inexpensive. Our approach is based on the Provision Ratio, a metric that estimates the contribution of a customer to the provider's peak traffic. The proposed mechanism has fairness properties similar to the optimal (in terms of fairness) Shapley value allocation, with a much smaller computational complexity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1145\/2695533.2695542","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]],"date-time":"2014-12-08T16:17:14Z","timestamp":1418055434000},"page":"25-28","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1145\/crossmark-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Fair, Flexible and Feasible ISP Billing"],"prefix":"10.1145","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"Vamseedhar Reddyvari","family":"Raja","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Texas A&M University, College Station, TX"}]},{"given":"Srinivas","family":"Shakkottai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Texas A&M University, College Station, TX"}]},{"given":"Amogh","family":"Dhamdhere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CAIDA\/UCSD, La Jolla CA"}]},{"given":"kc","family":"claffy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"CAIDA\/UCSD, La Jolla CA"}]}],"member":"320","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_2_1_1_1","volume-title":"k. claffy, and S. Leinen, \"Volume-Based Transit Pricing: Is 95 the Right Percentile?\" in Proceedings of PAM","author":"Raja V. R.","year":"2014","unstructured":"V. R. Raja , A. Dhamdhere , A. Scicchitano , S. Shakkottai , k. claffy, and S. Leinen, \"Volume-Based Transit Pricing: Is 95 the Right Percentile?\" in Proceedings of PAM , 2014 . V. R. Raja, A. Dhamdhere, A. Scicchitano, S. Shakkottai, k. claffy, and S. Leinen, \"Volume-Based Transit Pricing: Is 95 the Right Percentile?\" in Proceedings of PAM, 2014."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_2_1","unstructured":"W. B. Norton \"Internet Transit Prices - Historical and Projected \" http:\/\/drpeering.net\/AskDrPeering\/blog. W. B. Norton \"Internet Transit Prices - Historical and Projected \" http:\/\/drpeering.net\/AskDrPeering\/blog."},{"key":"e_1_2_1_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1921168.1921196"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1389-1286(01)00188-8"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-00975-4_21"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/1879141.1879151"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/INFOCOM.2006.236"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1090\/qam\/10666"},{"key":"e_1_2_1_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2096149.2096157"}],"container-title":["ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1145\/2695533.2695542","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,30]],"date-time":"2022-12-30T20:28:26Z","timestamp":1672432106000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2695533.2695542"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1145\/2695533.2695542"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2695533.2695542","relation":{},"ISSN":["0163-5999"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0163-5999","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,12,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2014-12-08","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}