{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,13]],"date-time":"2024-09-13T05:54:10Z","timestamp":1726206850215},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,21]],"date-time":"2020-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1595289600000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["cambridge.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>We present four classical theories of counterpossibles that combine modalities and counterfactuals. Two theories are anti-vacuist and forbid vacuously true counterfactuals, two are quasi-vacuist and allow counterfactuals to be vacuously true when their antecedent is not only impossible, but also inconceivable<\/jats:italic>. The theories vary on how they restrict the interaction of modalities and counterfactuals. We provide a logical cartography with precise acceptable boundaries, illustrating to what extent nonvacuism about counterpossibles can be reconciled with classical logic.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s1755020319000637","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,21]],"date-time":"2020-07-21T03:57:19Z","timestamp":1595303839000},"page":"259-275","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1017\/policypage","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["CLASSICAL COUNTERPOSSIBLES"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"15","author":[{"given":"ROHAN","family":"FRENCH","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"PATRICK","family":"GIRARD","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"DAVID","family":"RIPLEY","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"S1755020319000637_r11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-67458-7_9"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1039540767"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-016-0672-9"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781107050884"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r19","first-page":"165","volume-title":"Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy","author":"Zagzebski","year":"1990"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r12","volume-title":"Counterfactuals","author":"Lewis","year":"1973"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1305\/ndjfl\/1039540769"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r18","volume-title":"Philosophical Fictionalism","author":"Williamson","year":"2020"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00693270"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r3","article-title":"Williamson on counterpossibles","volume":"47","author":"Berto","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-012-0196-6"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r8","first-page":"271","volume-title":"Graham Priest on Dialetheism and Paraconsistency, Outstanding Contributions to Logic","author":"Girard","year":"2020"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-005-3022-x"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r1","first-page":"1","article-title":"How mathematics can make a difference","volume":"17","author":"Baron","year":"2017","journal-title":"Philosophers\u2019 Imprint"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r9","first-page":"93","article-title":"Absolute necessities","volume":"10","author":"Hale","year":"1996","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-013-0133-7"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r16","author":"Stalnaker","year":"1968"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01306969"},{"key":"S1755020319000637_r17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-016-0671-x"}],"container-title":["The Review of Symbolic Logic"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S1755020319000637","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,29]],"date-time":"2022-03-29T12:59:48Z","timestamp":1648558788000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S1755020319000637\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,21]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["S1755020319000637"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s1755020319000637","relation":{},"ISSN":["1755-0203","1755-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1755-0203","type":"print"},{"value":"1755-0211","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"\u00a9 Association for Symbolic Logic, 2020","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright","group":{"name":"copyright_and_licensing","label":"Copyright and Licensing"}}]}}