{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,4]],"date-time":"2023-07-04T21:16:27Z","timestamp":1688505387584},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Cambridge University Press (CUP)","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2002,8,19]],"date-time":"2002-08-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1029715200000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":261,"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/terms"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["The Knowledge Engineering Review"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,12]]},"abstract":"Argumentation concepts have been applied to numerous knowledge engineering endeavours in recent years. For example, a variety of logics have \nbeen developed to represent argumentation in the context of a dialectical situation such as a dialogue. In contrast to the dialectical approach, argumentation has also been used to structure knowledge. This can be seen as a non-dialectical approach. The Toulmin \nargument structure has often been used to structure knowledge non-dialectically yet most studies that apply the Toulmin structure do not use the original structure but vary one or more components. Variations to the Toulmin structure can be understood as different \nways to integrate a dialectical perspective with a non-dialectical one. Drawing the dialectical\/non-dialectical distinction enables the specification of a framework \ncalled the generic actual argument model that is expressly non-dialectical. \nThe framework enables the development of knowledge-based systems that integrate \na variety of inference procedures, combine information retrieval with reasoning \nand facilitate automated document drafting. Furthermore, the non-dialectical framework provides the foundation for simple dialectical models. Systems based on our \napproach have been developed in family law, refugee law, determining \neligibility for government legal aid, copyright law and e-tourism.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1017\/s0269888901000248","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,9,11]],"date-time":"2002-09-11T11:43:00Z","timestamp":1031744580000},"page":"331-348","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoning"],"prefix":"10.1017","volume":"16","author":[{"given":"ANDREW","family":"STRANIERI","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"JOHN","family":"ZELEZNIKOW","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"JOHN","family":"YEARWOOD","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"56","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2002,8,19]]},"container-title":["The Knowledge Engineering Review"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/services\/aop-cambridge-core\/content\/view\/S0269888901000248","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,5,7]],"date-time":"2019-05-07T21:35:22Z","timestamp":1557264922000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.cambridge.org\/core\/product\/identifier\/S0269888901000248\/type\/journal_article"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2001,12]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2001,12]]}},"alternative-id":["S0269888901000248"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0269888901000248","relation":{},"ISSN":["0269-8889","1469-8005"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0269-8889","type":"print"},{"value":"1469-8005","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2001,12]]}}}