{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,3]],"date-time":"2024-09-03T11:46:24Z","timestamp":1725363984522},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]],"date-time":"2020-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1600387200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]],"date-time":"2020-09-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1600387200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Comput Soc Sc"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>This paper\u2019s purpose is to clarify groupthink phenomena and to assess the devil\u2019s advocacy as a groupthink prevention measure. An agent-based model is presented to formalize group closed-mindedness and insulation in a group decision making setting. The model was validated by showing that groupthink results in the decision with low quality and the group\u2019s inability to explore more alternatives. Besides that, the devil\u2019s advocacy also formulated in the model. The simulation results of different conditions of the devil\u2019s advocacy support Janis\u2019 suggestion to utilize the devil\u2019s advocacy to alleviate groupthink. It is also found that the utilization of devil\u2019s advocacy depends on the group\u2019s condition and the desired amount of conflict to produce the best decision.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]],"date-time":"2020-09-18T09:03:59Z","timestamp":1600419839000},"page":"455-478","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil\u2019s advocacy as a preventive measure"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"4","author":[{"ORCID":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3167-7535","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Muqtafi","family":"Akhmad","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Shuang","family":"Chang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Hiroshi","family":"Deguchi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"83_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1108\/17511340910943804","volume":"15","author":"D Ahlstrom","year":"2009","unstructured":"Ahlstrom, D., & Wang, L. C. (2009). Groupthink and France\u2019s defeat in the 1940 campaign. Journal of Management History, 15(2), 159\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/17511340910943804.","journal-title":"Journal of Management History"},{"key":"83_CR2","unstructured":"Altenberg, L. (1996). B2.7.2 NK Fitness Landscapes. Evolution."},{"key":"83_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Amidon, M. (2005). Groupthink, Politics, and the Decision to Attempt the Son Tay Rescue. Parameters, 35(3).","DOI":"10.55540\/0031-1723.2261"},{"key":"83_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1016\/S0065-2601(05)37004-3","volume":"37","author":"RS Baron","year":"2005","unstructured":"Baron, R. S. (2005). So Right It\u2019s Wrong: Groupthink and the ubiquitous nature of polarized group decision making. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 219\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0065-2601(05)37004-3.","journal-title":"Advances in Experimental Social Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Billinger, S., Stieglitz, N., & Schumacher, T. R. (2010). Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.1711743.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.1711743"},{"key":"83_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl. 3), 7280\u20137287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.082080899. http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/12011407.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.082080899"},{"issue":"5","key":"83_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2013.04.005","volume":"49","author":"M Brambilla","year":"2013","unstructured":"Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811\u2013821. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2013.04.005.","journal-title":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},{"issue":"3","key":"83_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1111\/0022-4537.00126","volume":"55","author":"MB Brewer","year":"1999","unstructured":"Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429\u2013444. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/0022-4537.00126.","journal-title":"Journal of Social Issues"},{"key":"83_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Carbone, G., & Giannoccaro, I. (2015). Model of human collective decision-making in complex environments. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1140\/epjb\/e2015-60609-0. arXiv:1507.02139.","DOI":"10.1140\/epjb\/e2015-60609-0"},{"key":"83_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2017). Introduction to computational social science: principles and applications, 2nd edn. (pp. 389, 482, 483). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-50131-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-50131-4"},{"issue":"2","key":"83_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1177\/875697280503600204","volume":"36","author":"RD Dimitroff","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dimitroff, R. D., Schmidt, L. A., & Bond, T. D. (2005). Organizational behavior and disaster: a study of conflict at NASA. Project Management Journal, 36(2), 28\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/875697280503600204.","journal-title":"Project Management Journal"},{"key":"83_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Eder, F. (2017). Making Concurrence-Seeking Visible: Groupthink, Discourse Networks, and the 2003 Iraq War. Foreign Policy Analysis, 15(1), 21\u201342.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/fpa\/orx009.","DOI":"10.1093\/fpa\/orx009"},{"key":"83_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Esser, J. (1998). Alive and Well after 25 Years: A Review of Groupthink Research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 116\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/obhd.1998.2758. http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/9705799.","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.1998.2758"},{"key":"83_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fiske, S. T., & Ruscher, J. B. (1993). Negative interdependence and prejudice: Whence the affect? In Affect. Cogn. Stereotyping Interact. Process. Gr. Percept. (pp. 239\u2013268). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-08-088579-7.50015-6.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-08-088579-7.50015-6"},{"key":"83_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2001). Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30(7), 1019\u20131039. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0048-7333(00)00135-9. https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0048733300001359.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0048-7333(00)00135-9"},{"issue":"1","key":"83_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.42.1.178","volume":"42","author":"EM Fodor","year":"1982","unstructured":"Fodor, E. M., & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 178\u2013185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.42.1.178.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ganco, M. (2017). Nk model as a representation of innovative search. Research Policy, 46(10), 1783\u20131800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2017.08.009. http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S0048733317301415.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2017.08.009"},{"key":"83_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10614-009-9192-4","author":"S Geisendorf","year":"2010","unstructured":"Geisendorf, S. (2010). Searching NK fitness landscapes: on the trade off between speed and quality in complex problem solving. Computational Economics,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10614-009-9192-4.","journal-title":"Computational Economics"},{"issue":"2","key":"83_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1037\/\/1089-2699.1.2.144","volume":"1","author":"G Hodson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hodson, G., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1997). Groupthink and uncertainty orientation: personality differences in reactivity to the group situation. Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, 1(2), 144\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/\/1089-2699.1.2.144.","journal-title":"Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice"},{"key":"83_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hogg, M.A. (2016). Social identity theory. In: S.\u00a0McKeown, R.\u00a0Haji, N.\u00a0Ferguson (Eds.), Underst. Peace Confl. Through Soc. Identity Theory Contemp. Glob. Perspect. (pp. 3\u201317). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-29869-6_1.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-29869-6_1"},{"issue":"3","key":"83_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1099-0992(199805\/06)28:3<323::AID-EJSP854>3.0.CO;2-Y","volume":"28","author":"MA Hogg","year":"1998","unstructured":"Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1998). Friendship and group identification: a new look at the role of cohesiveness in groupthink. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 323\u2013341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1099-0992(199805\/06)28:3<323::AID-EJSP854>3.0.CO;2-Y.","journal-title":"European Journal of Social Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR22","unstructured":"Janis, I. L. (1983). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, 2 edn. Houghton Mifflin."},{"key":"83_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kaba, A., Wishart, I., Fraser, K., Coderre, S., & Mclaughlin, K. (2016). Are we at risk of groupthink in our approach to teamwork interventions in health care? Medical Education. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/medu.12943.","DOI":"10.1111\/medu.12943"},{"issue":"1","key":"83_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5193(87)80029-2","volume":"128","author":"S Kauffman","year":"1987","unstructured":"Kauffman, S., & Levin, S. (1987). Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128(1), 11\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-5193(87)80029-2.","journal-title":"Journal of Theoretical Biology"},{"key":"83_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kowalska-Stycze\u0144, A., Malarz, K., & Paradowski, K. (2018). Model of knowledge transfer within an organisation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(2), 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18564\/jasss.3659. http:\/\/jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk\/21\/2\/3.html.","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.3659"},{"key":"83_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lazer, D., & Friedman, A. (2007). The network structure of exploration and exploitation. Administrative Science Quarterly. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2189\/asqu.52.4.667.","DOI":"10.2189\/asqu.52.4.667"},{"key":"83_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Leana, C. R. (1985). A Partial Test of Janis\u2019 Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014920638501100102.","DOI":"10.1177\/014920638501100102"},{"key":"83_CR28","unstructured":"Lunenburg, F. (2012). Devil\u2019s advocacy and dialectical inquiry: Antidotes to groupthink. International Journal of Scholarly Academic Intellectual Diversity."},{"issue":"4","key":"83_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"532","DOI":"10.1177\/104973239700700407","volume":"7","author":"C MacDougall","year":"1997","unstructured":"MacDougall, C., & Baum, F. (1997). The devil\u2019s advocate: a strategy to avoid groupthink and stimulate discussion in focus groups. Qualitative Health Research, 7(4), 532\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/104973239700700407.","journal-title":"Qualitative Health Research"},{"issue":"5","key":"83_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1177\/001872678603900502","volume":"39","author":"G Moorhead","year":"1986","unstructured":"Moorhead, G., & Montanari, J. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39(5), 399\u2013410. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/001872678603900502.","journal-title":"Human Relations"},{"key":"83_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/orsc.5.1.14","author":"I Nonaka","year":"1994","unstructured":"Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/orsc.5.1.14.","journal-title":"Organization Science"},{"key":"83_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Park, W. (2000). A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior (February), 762\u2013777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1099-1379(200012)21:8<873::AID-JOB56>3.0.CO;2-8.","DOI":"10.1002\/1099-1379(200012)21:8<873::AID-JOB56>3.0.CO;2-8"},{"key":"83_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/obhd.2000.2888","author":"PB Paulus","year":"2000","unstructured":"Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1006\/obhd.2000.2888.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},{"issue":"5","key":"83_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.72.5.1107","volume":"72","author":"RS Peterson","year":"1997","unstructured":"Peterson, R. S. (1997). A directive leadership style in group decision making can be both virtue and vice: evidence from elite and experimental groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1107\u20131121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.72.5.1107.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x","author":"VL Putman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. The Journal of Creative Behavior,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x.","journal-title":"The Journal of Creative Behavior"},{"issue":"4","key":"83_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1111\/poms.12431","volume":"25","author":"F Riccobono","year":"2016","unstructured":"Riccobono, F., Bruccoleri, M., & Gr\u00f6\u00dfler, A. (2016). Groupthink and project performance: the influence of personal traits and interpersonal ties. Production and Operations Management, 25(4), 609\u2013629. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/poms.12431.","journal-title":"Production and Operations Management"},{"key":"83_CR37","unstructured":"Richiardi, M., Leombruni, R., Saam, N., & Sonnessa, M. (2006). A common protocol for agent-based social simulation.\u00a0Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(1), 15. http:\/\/jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk\/9\/1\/15.html."},{"key":"83_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/mnsc.49.3.290.12740","author":"JW Rivkin","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rivkin, J. W., & Siggelkow, N. (2003). Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Science,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/mnsc.49.3.290.12740.","journal-title":"Management Science"},{"key":"83_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9450.00060","author":"M Rosander","year":"1998","unstructured":"Rosander, M., Stiwne, D., & Granstr\u00f6m, K. (1998). \u201cBipolar groupthink\u201d: Assessing groupthink tendencies in authentic work groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-9450.00060.","journal-title":"Scandinavian Journal of Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR40","unstructured":"Rose, J. D. (2011). Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory\u2014a literary review. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(c), 37\u201357. http:\/\/www.regent.edu\/acad\/global\/publications\/elj\/vol4iss1\/Rose_V4I1_pp37-57.pdf."},{"key":"83_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L., & Lintunen, T. (2009). Can high group cohesion be harmful?: A case study of a junior Ice-Hockey Team. Small Group Research, 40(4), 421\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1046496409334359. http:\/\/sgr.sagepub.com\/content\/40\/4\/421.","DOI":"10.1177\/1046496409334359"},{"issue":"1","key":"83_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-2478.00222","volume":"46","author":"M Schafer","year":"2002","unstructured":"Schafer, M., & Crichlow, S. (2002). The process-outcome connection in foreign policy decision making: A quantitative study building on groupthink. International Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 45\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-2478.00222.","journal-title":"International Studies Quarterly"},{"key":"83_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0749-5978(90)90051-A","author":"CR Schwenk","year":"1990","unstructured":"Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Effects of devil\u2019s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0749-5978(90)90051-A.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes"},{"key":"83_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0030-5073(80)90076-8","author":"CR Schwenk","year":"1980","unstructured":"Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1980). Effects of the expert, devil\u2019s advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0030-5073(80)90076-8.","journal-title":"Organizational Behavior and Human Performance"},{"issue":"1","key":"83_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1080\/23808985.1998.11678952","volume":"21","author":"MW Seeger","year":"1998","unstructured":"Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (1998). Communication, organization, and crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 21(1), 231\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23808985.1998.11678952.","journal-title":"Annals of the International Communication Association"},{"key":"83_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1287\/orsc.14.6.650.24870","author":"N Siggelkow","year":"2003","unstructured":"Siggelkow, N., & Levinthal, D. A. (2003). Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1287\/orsc.14.6.650.24870.","journal-title":"Organization Science"},{"key":"83_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01686345","author":"RR Sims","year":"1992","unstructured":"Sims, R. R. (1992). Linking groupthink to unethical behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01686345.","journal-title":"Journal of Business Ethics"},{"key":"83_CR48","unstructured":"Smart, P. R., Huynh, T. D., Braines, D., & Shadbolt, N. (2010). Dynamic networks and distributed problem-solving. In Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations (KSCO\u201910). https:\/\/eprints.soton.ac.uk\/271508\/(Event Dates: 21st\u201323rd September 2010)."},{"key":"83_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Stangor, C. (2017). Group Processes. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190236557.013.255.","DOI":"10.1093\/acrefore\/9780190236557.013.255"},{"issue":"5","key":"83_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.63.5.781","volume":"63","author":"ME Turner","year":"1992","unstructured":"Turner, M. E., Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.63.5.781.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"83_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/caim.12059","author":"O Vuculescu","year":"2014","unstructured":"Vuculescu, O., & Bergenholtz, C. (2014). How to solve problems with crowds: a computer-based simulation model. Creativity and Innovation Management,. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/caim.12059.","journal-title":"Creativity and Innovation Management"},{"key":"83_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Windrum, P., Fagiolo, G., & Moneta, A. (2007). Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects. JASSS.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10614-007-9109-z"},{"key":"83_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yan, J., Liu, R., & Zhang, G. (2018). Task structure, individual bounded rationality and crowdsourcing performance: an agent-based simulation approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 21(4), 12. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18564\/jasss.3854. http:\/\/jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk\/21\/4\/12.html.","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.3854"}],"container-title":["Journal of Computational Social Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,19]],"date-time":"2022-11-19T02:30:01Z","timestamp":1668825001000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11]]}},"alternative-id":["83"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42001-020-00083-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["2432-2717","2432-2725"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2432-2717","type":"print"},{"value":"2432-2725","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"9 April 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 August 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 September 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}