{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:13:32Z","timestamp":1740147212841,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,1]],"date-time":"2022-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1648771200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,13]],"date-time":"2022-04-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649808000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":12,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001711","name":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F\u00f6rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["PP00P1_176703"],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001711","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100006447","name":"University of Zurich","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100006447","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>Recent developments in theories for responsible innovation have focused on the importance of actively accounting for values in our technological designs. Leading among these theories is that of Value Sensitive Design (VSD) which attempts to guide the design process on the basis of evaluative analysis. However, values often come into conflict and VSD has been criticized for not providing a proper method to resolve such inevitable conflicts. This paper examines three such methods and argues that although each has its merits, they all fail to account for a common source of value conflicts known as value incommensurability. Drawing on literature from the field of axiology, this paper argues that by incorporating the evaluative relation of \u2018parity\u2019 each of these three methods, and the VSD framework in general, will be able to properly understand the relation which holds between conflicting design options stemming from the incommensurable of values and be able to guide designers in making rational decision in the face of such conflicts.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,13]],"date-time":"2022-04-13T13:02:47Z","timestamp":1649854967000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Parity and the Resolution of Value Conflicts in Design"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6038-5606","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Atay","family":"Kozlovski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"375_CR1","unstructured":"Bozdag, E. & van de Poel, I. (2013). Designing for diversity in online news recommenders. Proceedings of PICMET '13: Technology management in the IT-driven services (PICMET), San Jose, CA. pp. 1101\u20131106."},{"key":"375_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2629","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00223-3","volume":"26","author":"A Cenci","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cenci, A., & Cawthorne, D. (2020). Refining value sensitive design: A (capability-based) procedural ethics approach to technological design for well-being. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2629\u20132662.","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"375_CR3","volume-title":"\u201cIntroduction\u201d in Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason","author":"R Chang","year":"1997","unstructured":"Chang, R. (1997). \u201cIntroduction\u201d in incommensurability, incomparability, and practical reason. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"375_CR4","volume-title":"Making Comparisons Count","author":"R Chang","year":"2001","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2001). Making comparisons count. Routledge."},{"key":"375_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"659","DOI":"10.1086\/339673","volume":"112","author":"R Chang","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2002). The possibility of parity. Ethics, 112, 659\u2013688.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"375_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511720185.012","volume-title":"Reasons for Action","author":"R Chang","year":"2009","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2009). Voluntarist reasons and the sources of normativity. In D. Sobel & S. Wall (Eds.), Reasons for action (pp. 243\u2013271). Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"375_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2013a). Grounding practical normativity: Going hybrid. Philosophical Studies, 164 (1), 163\u2013187.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-013-0092-z"},{"key":"375_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2013b). Commitment, reasons, and the will. In R. Shafer-Landau (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics,\u00a0Vol. 8, (pp. 74\u2013113). Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199678044.003.0004"},{"key":"375_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2015). Incommensurability and incomparability. In I. Hirose & J. Olson (Eds.), Oxford handbook in value theory. Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199959303.013.0012"},{"key":"375_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"182","DOI":"10.1111\/theo.12096","volume":"82","author":"R Chang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2016). Parity, imprecise comparability and the repugnant conclusion. Theoria, 82, 182\u2013214.","journal-title":"Theoria"},{"issue":"1","key":"375_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"275","DOI":"10.1093\/arisup\/akaa012","volume":"94","author":"R Chang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chang, R. (2020). Do we have normative powers? Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 94(1), 275\u2013300.","journal-title":"Aristotelian Society Supplementary"},{"issue":"332","key":"375_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LXXXIII.332.534","volume":"83","author":"RB De Sousa","year":"1974","unstructured":"De Sousa, R. B. (1974). The good and the true. Mind, 83(332), 534\u2013551.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"375_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1086\/674844","volume":"124","author":"L Elson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Elson, L. (2014). Heaps and chains: Is the chaining argument for parity a sorites? Ethics, 124, 557\u2013571.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"375_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Friedman, B., & Hendry, D. (2019) Value sensitive design: Shaping technology with moral imagination. The MIT Press","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/7585.001.0001"},{"key":"375_CR15","volume-title":"The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook","author":"B Friedman","year":"2003","unstructured":"Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"375_CR16","volume-title":"Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. Philosophy of engineering and technology","author":"B Friedman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Borning, A., & Huldtgren, A. (2013). Value sensitive design and information systems. In N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, & M. Gorman (Eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory. Philosophy of engineering and technology. Springer."},{"issue":"4","key":"375_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"373","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsis.2011.06.001","volume":"20","author":"K Hedstr\u00f6m","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hedstr\u00f6m, K., Kolkowska, E., Karlsson, F., & Allen, J. P. (2011). Value conflicts for information security management. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 373\u2013384.","journal-title":"The Journal of Strategic Information Systems"},{"issue":"2","key":"375_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820805001512","volume":"17","author":"N Hsieh","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hsieh, N. (2005). Equality, clumpiness and incomparability. Utilitas, 17(2), 180\u2013204.","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"key":"375_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jacobs, N. (2020). Capability sensitive design for health and wellbeing technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 3363\u20133391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-020-00275-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-020-00275-5"},{"key":"375_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jacobs, N., & Huldtgren, A. (2021). Why value sensitive design needs ethical commitments. Ethics and Information Technology, 23, 23\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-018-9467-3.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-018-9467-3"},{"key":"375_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15710882.2020.1782437","author":"C Le Bail","year":"2020","unstructured":"Le Bail, C., Baker, M., & D\u00e9tienne, F. (2020). Values and argumentation in collaborative design. CoDesign. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15710882.2020.1782437","journal-title":"CoDesign"},{"issue":"2","key":"375_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-010-9198-2","volume":"17","author":"N Manders-Huits","year":"2011","unstructured":"Manders-Huits, N. (2011). What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 271\u2013287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-010-9198-2","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"375_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Martin, B., & Richards, E. (1995). Scientific knowledge, controversy, and public decision-making. Handbook of science and technology studies, (pp. 506\u2013526). Sage. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781412990127.n22","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412990127.n22"},{"key":"375_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Miller, J. K., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., & Gill, B. (2007). Value tensions in design: The value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation\u2019s groupware system. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work (pp. 281\u2013290). ACM.","DOI":"10.1145\/1316624.1316668"},{"key":"375_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.destud.2017.09.006","volume":"54","author":"L Mok","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mok, L., & Hyysalo, S. (2017). Designing for energy transition through value sensitive design. Design Studies., 54, 162\u2013183.","journal-title":"Design Studies."},{"key":"375_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parfit, D. (1986). Reasons and persons. Clarendon Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/019824908X.001.0001"},{"key":"375_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raz, J. (1988). The morality of freedom. Oxford University.","DOI":"10.1093\/0198248075.001.0001"},{"key":"375_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2015.12.001","volume":"64","author":"J Rezaei","year":"2016","unstructured":"Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126\u2013130.","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"375_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.9707\/2307-0919.1116","author":"SH Schwartz","year":"2012","unstructured":"Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.9707\/2307-0919.1116","journal-title":"Online Readings in Psychology and Culture"},{"issue":"4","key":"375_CR30","first-page":"321","volume":"22","author":"W Sinnott-Armstrong","year":"1985","unstructured":"Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (1985). Moral dilemmas and incomparability. American Philosophical Quarterly, 22(4), 321\u2013329.","journal-title":"American Philosophical Quarterly"},{"key":"375_CR31","volume-title":"Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design","author":"B Taebi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Taebi, B., & Kloosterman, J. L. (2015). Design for values in nuclear technology. In J. Van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, & I. Van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design. Springer."},{"key":"375_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-7762-0_20","volume-title":"Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process","author":"I Van de Poel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Van de Poel, I. (2013). Translating values into design requirements. In D. Mitchfelder, N. McCarty, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 253\u2013266). Springer."},{"key":"375_CR33","volume-title":"Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design","author":"I Van de Poel","year":"2015","unstructured":"Van de Poel, I. (2015). Conflicting values in design for values. In J. van den Hoven, P. Vermaas, & I. van de Poel (Eds.), Handbook of ethics, values, and technological design. Springer."},{"key":"375_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1017\/9780511844317.004","volume-title":"Designing in Ethics","author":"I Van de Poel","year":"2017","unstructured":"Van de Poel, I. (2017). Dealing with moral dilemmas through design. In J. Van den Hoven, S. Miller, & T. Pogge (Eds.), Designing in ethics (pp. 57\u201377). Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"375_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-011-9277-z","volume":"18","author":"J Van den Hoven","year":"2012","unstructured":"Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G. J., & Van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 143\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-011-9277-z","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"375_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Wynsberghe, A. (2013). Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(2), 407\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-011-9343-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-011-9343-6"},{"key":"375_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10676-018-9476-2","author":"T Winkler","year":"2018","unstructured":"Winkler, T., & Spiekermann, S. (2018). Twenty years of value sensitive design: A review of methodological practices in VSD projects. Ethics and Information Technology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10676-018-9476-2","journal-title":"Ethics and Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"375_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"391","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2004.00034.x","volume":"18","author":"R Wasserman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wasserman, R. (2004). Indeterminacy, Ignorance and the Possibility of Parity. Philosophical Perspectives, 18(1), 391\u2013403. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/J.1520-8583.2004.00034.X","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,28]],"date-time":"2023-03-28T08:37:19Z","timestamp":1679992639000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]}},"alternative-id":["375"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-022-00375-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1353-3452"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1471-5546"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 February 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 March 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 April 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"22"}}