乐胖代购免代理版

{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,15]],"date-time":"2024-09-15T15:28:32Z","timestamp":1726414112249},"reference-count":80,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,3]],"date-time":"2017-08-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1501718400000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Sci Eng Ethics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,3]],"date-time":"2017-08-03T14:11:18Z","timestamp":1501769478000},"page":"1347-1365","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":18,"title":["Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Jaime A.","family":"Teixeira da Silva","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Aceil","family":"Al-Khatib","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Vedran","family":"Katavi\u0107","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Helmar","family":"Bornemann-Cimenti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"9921_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9808-8","author":"A Al-Khatib","year":"2017","unstructured":"Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017a). What rights do authors have? Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11948-016-9808-8\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"key":"9921_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-016-9486-z","volume":"33","author":"A Al-Khatib","year":"2017","unstructured":"Al-Khatib, A., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017b). Threats to the survival of the author-pays-journal to publish model. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33, 64\u201370. doi:\n 10.1007\/s12109-016-9486-z\n \n .","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaad.2007.12.025","volume":"58","author":"AW Armstrong","year":"2008","unstructured":"Armstrong, A. W., Idriss, S. Z., Kimball, A. B., & Bernhard, J. D. (2008). Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 58(4), 632\u2013635. doi:\n 10.1016\/j.jaad.2007.12.025\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology"},{"key":"9921_CR4","unstructured":"Arvan, M. (2014). On desk rejections and rejections without comments. The Philosophers\u2019 Cocoon \n http:\/\/philosopherscocoon.typepad.com\/blog\/2014\/02\/on-desk-rejections-and-rejections-without-comments.html\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR5","unstructured":"Australian Society of Philosophy (2017). Authors\u2019 instructions concerning submissions\u20143. Minimum standards. \n http:\/\/www.aap.org.au\/submissions#Minimum\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.3152\/095820209X477520","volume":"18","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: An investigation of manuscript refereeing at\u00a0Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Research Evaluation, 18, 262\u2013272. doi:\n 10.3152\/095820209X477520\n \n .","journal-title":"Research Evaluation"},{"key":"9921_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"681","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0215-7","volume":"85","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). The validity of staff editors\u2019 initial evaluations of manuscripts: A case study of Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Scientometrics, 85, 681\u2013687. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11192-010-0215-7\n \n .","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"7643","key":"9921_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1038\/543040e","volume":"543","author":"J Budd","year":"2017","unstructured":"Budd, J. (2017). Reformatting wastes public funds. Nature, 543(7643), 40. doi:\n 10.1038\/543040e\n \n .","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"9921_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1065","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1227833","volume":"338","author":"V Calcagno","year":"2012","unstructured":"Calcagno, V., Demoinet, E., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D., & de Mazancourt, C. (2012). Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science, 338, 1065\u20131069. doi:\n 10.1126\/science.1227833\n \n .","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"9921_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2241-1","author":"N Casnici","year":"2017","unstructured":"Casnici, N., Grimaldo, F., Gilbert, N., Dondio, P., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: The case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. Scientometrics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11192-017-2241-1\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9921_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.7763\/IJSSH.2011.V1.36","volume":"1","author":"V Cawley","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cawley, V. (2011). Is peer review unethical? An ethical analysis. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(3), 205\u2013213.","journal-title":"International Journal of Social Science and Humanity"},{"key":"9921_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.4033\/iee.2012.5b.17.f","volume":"5","author":"SJ Cooke","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cooke, S. J., & Lapointe, N. W. R. (2012). Addressing editor(ial) malpractice in scientific journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 84\u201392. doi:\n 10.4033\/iee.2012.5b.17.f\n \n .","journal-title":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution"},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"723","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jaad.2008.05.026","volume":"59","author":"RP Dellavalle","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dellavalle, R. P., & Harrison, C. (2008). Reinterpreting the fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 59(4), 723\u2013724. doi:\n 10.1016\/j.jaad.2008.05.026\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology"},{"issue":"3","key":"9921_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.5901\/jesr.2016.v6n3p9","volume":"6","author":"J Dobr\u00e1nszki","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dobr\u00e1nszki, J., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). Editorial responsibilities: Both sides of the coin. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(3), 9\u201310. doi:\n 10.5901\/jesr.2016.v6n3p9\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Educational and Social Research"},{"issue":"7434","key":"9921_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.5901\/jesr.2016.v6n3p9","volume":"328","author":"O Dyer","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dyer, O. (2004). Journal rejects article after objections from marketing department. British Medical Journal, 328(7434), 244. doi:\n 10.5901\/jesr.2016.v6n3p9\n \n .","journal-title":"British Medical Journal"},{"key":"9921_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/coa.12820","author":"CH Earnshaw","year":"2017","unstructured":"Earnshaw, C. H., Edwin, C., Bhat, J., Krishnan, M., Mamais, C., Somashekar, S., et al. (2017). An analysis of the fate of 917 manuscripts rejected from Clinical Otolaryngology. Clinical Otolaryngology. doi:\n 10.1111\/coa.12820\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Clinical Otolaryngology"},{"key":"9921_CR17","unstructured":"Elsevier (2015). 5 ways you can ensure your manuscript avoids the desk reject pile. \n https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/authors-update\/story\/publishing-tips\/5-ways-you-can-ensure-your-manuscript-avoids-the-desk-reject-pile\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR18","unstructured":"Evans, L., & Homer, M. (2014). Academic journal editors\u2019 professionalism: Perceptions of power, proficiency and personal agendas. Society for Research into Higher Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK, final report, 39\u00a0pp."},{"key":"9921_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"238","DOI":"10.1890\/0012-9623-95.3.238","volume":"95","author":"AG Farji-Brener","year":"2014","unstructured":"Farji-Brener, A. G., & Kitzberger, T. (2014). Rejecting editorial rejections revisited: Are editors of ecological journals good oracles? The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 95, 238\u2013242. doi:\n 10.1890\/0012-9623-95.3.238\n \n .","journal-title":"The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America"},{"key":"9921_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/ejn.13541","author":"JJ Foxe","year":"2017","unstructured":"Foxe, J. J., & Bolam, J. P. (2017). Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication. European Journal of Neuroscience. doi:\n 10.1111\/ejn.13541\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"European Journal of Neuroscience"},{"issue":"10","key":"9921_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.7860\/JCDR\/2015\/17160.6699","volume":"9","author":"A Garg","year":"2015","unstructured":"Garg, A., Das, S., & Jain, H. (2015). Why we say no! A look through the editor\u2019s eye. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 9(10), 1\u20135. doi:\n 10.7860\/JCDR\/2015\/17160.6699\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research"},{"key":"9921_CR22","unstructured":"Godlee, F. (2017). BMJ editor confirms that revenues from industry will be declared. British Medical Journal (response to 2015 editorial) \n http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/351\/bmj.h3908\/rr-16\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1300\/J092v12n04","volume":"12","author":"E Goudsmit","year":"2005","unstructured":"Goudsmit, E., & Stouten, B. (2005). Chronic fatigue syndrome: Editorial bias in the British Medical Journal. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, 12(4), 47\u201359. doi:\n 10.1300\/J092v12n04\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome"},{"issue":"10","key":"9921_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1213","DOI":"10.1111\/acem.12763","volume":"22","author":"WD Grant","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grant, W. D., & Cone, D. C. (2015). If at first you don\u2019t succeed: The fate of manuscripts rejected by Academic Emergency Medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine, 22(10), 1213\u20131217. doi:\n 10.1111\/acem.12763\n \n .","journal-title":"Academic Emergency Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ede.0000254668.63378.32","volume":"18","author":"SA Hall","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hall, S. A., & Wilcox, A. J. (2007). The fate of epidemiologic manuscripts: A study of papers submitted to Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 18(2), 262\u2013265. doi:\n 10.1097\/01.ede.0000254668.63378.32\n \n .","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"9921_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1092","author":"J Hartley","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hartley, J., & Cabanac, G. (2017). The delights, discomforts, and downright furies of the manuscript submission process. Learned Publishing. doi:\n 10.1002\/leap.1092\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"issue":"9019","key":"9921_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)64352-8","volume":"348","author":"R Horton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Horton, R. (1996). The Lancet\u2019s ombudsman. The Lancet, 348(9019), 6. doi:\n 10.1016\/S0140-6736(05)64352-8\n \n .","journal-title":"The Lancet"},{"key":"9921_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2310-5","author":"J Huisman","year":"2017","unstructured":"Huisman, J., & Smits, J. (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process: The author\u2019s perspective. Scientometrics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11192-017-2310-5\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"9921_CR29","unstructured":"ICMJE (2017b). Responsibilities in the submission and peer-review process. \n http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/roles-and-responsibilities\/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR30","unstructured":"ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) (2017a). \n http:\/\/icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/manuscript-preparation\/preparing-for-submission.html\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"issue":"21","key":"9921_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2786","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.21.2786","volume":"287","author":"T Jefferson","year":"2002","unstructured":"Jefferson, T., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2786\u20132790. doi:\n 10.1001\/jama.287.21.2786\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR32","first-page":"1","volume":"1","author":"M Kumar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kumar, M. (2009). A review of the review process: Manuscript peer-review in biomedical research. Biology and Medicine, 1(4), 1\u201316.","journal-title":"Biology and Medicine"},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.12.004","volume":"143","author":"TJ Liesegang","year":"2007","unstructured":"Liesegang, T. J., Shaikh, M., & Crook, J. E. (2007). The outcome of manuscripts submitted to the American Journal of Ophthalmology between 2002 and 2003. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 143(4), 551\u2013560. doi:\n 10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.12.004\n \n .","journal-title":"American Journal of Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR34","first-page":"58","volume":"9","author":"D Light","year":"2008","unstructured":"Light, D., & Warburton, R. (2008). In focus: \u201cethical standards for healthcare journal editors: A case report and recommendations\u201d. Harvard Health Policy Review, 9(1), 58\u201367.","journal-title":"Harvard Health Policy Review"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jand.2015.07.014","volume":"116","author":"KM Lomangino","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lomangino, K. M. (2016). Countering cognitive bias: Tips for recognizing the impact of potential bias on research. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(2), 204\u2013205. doi:\n 10.1016\/j.jand.2015.07.014\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics"},{"key":"9921_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2008.026740","volume":"35","author":"J Luty","year":"2009","unstructured":"Luty, J., Arokiadass, S. M., Easow, J. M., & Anapreddy, J. R. (2009). Preferential publication of editorial board members in medical specialty journals. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 200\u2013202. doi:\n 10.1136\/jme.2008.026740\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"9921_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2008.05.002","volume":"47","author":"DS Malay","year":"2008","unstructured":"Malay, D. S. (2008). So, why peer review? The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 47(4), 265\u2013266. doi:\n 10.1053\/j.jfas.2008.05.002\n \n .","journal-title":"The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery"},{"issue":"5","key":"9921_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1177\/0162243908329381","volume":"34","author":"G Mallard","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mallard, G., Lamont, M., & Guetzkow, J. (2009). Fairness as appropriateness: Negotiating epistemological differences in peer review. Science, Technology and Human Values, 34(5), 573\u2013606. doi:\n 10.1177\/0162243908329381\n \n .","journal-title":"Science, Technology and Human Values"},{"issue":"3","key":"9921_CR39","first-page":"545","volume":"26","author":"A Marusi\u0107","year":"2007","unstructured":"Marusi\u0107, A., Katavi\u0107, V., & Marusi\u0107, M. (2007). Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Medicine and Law, 26(3), 545\u2013566.","journal-title":"Medicine and Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR40","first-page":"113","volume":"42","author":"M Marusi\u0107","year":"2001","unstructured":"Marusi\u0107, M., & Marusi\u0107, A. (2001). Good editorial practice: Editors as educators. Croatian Medical Journal, 42(2), 113\u2013120.","journal-title":"Croatian Medical Journal"},{"key":"9921_CR41","unstructured":"Matthews, D. (2015). Journal impact factors \u2018no longer credible\u2019. \n https:\/\/www.timeshighereducation.com\/news\/journal-impact-factors-no-longer-credible\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2816","DOI":"10.12688\/f1000research.10318.2","volume":"5","author":"PC Matthews","year":"2017","unstructured":"Matthews, P. C. (2017). Fairness in scientific publishing (version 2). F1000Research, 5, 2816. doi:\n 10.12688\/f1000research.10318.2\n \n .","journal-title":"F1000Research"},{"issue":"8","key":"9921_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1430","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A0766","volume":"28","author":"RJ McDonald","year":"2007","unstructured":"McDonald, R. J., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2007). Fate of submitted manuscripts rejected from the American Journal of Neuroradiology: Outcomes and commentary. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 28(8), 1430\u20131434.","journal-title":"American Journal of Neuroradiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.3174\/ajnr.A1366","volume":"30","author":"RJ McDonald","year":"2009","unstructured":"McDonald, R. J., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2009). Fate of manuscripts previously rejected by the American Journal of Neuroradiology: A follow-up analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 30(2), 253\u2013256.","journal-title":"American Journal of Neuroradiology"},{"key":"9921_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9879-1","author":"K Moustafa","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moustafa, K. (2017). Publishers: Save authors\u2019 time. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11948-017-9879-1\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"9","key":"9921_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1136\/oem.58.9.604","volume":"58","author":"B Nemery","year":"2001","unstructured":"Nemery, B. (2001). What happens to the manuscripts that have not been accepted for publication in Occupational and Environmental Medicine? Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 58(9), 604\u2013607. doi:\n 10.1136\/oem.58.9.604\n \n .","journal-title":"Occupational and Environmental Medicine"},{"key":"9921_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Opthof, T., Furstner, F., Van Geer, M., & Coronel, R. (2000). Regrets or no regrets? No regrets! The fate of rejected manuscripts. Cardiovascular Research, 45(1), 255\u2013258. doi:\n 10.1016\/S0008-6363(99)00339-9\n \n .","DOI":"10.1016\/S0008-6363(99)00339-9"},{"issue":"6289","key":"9921_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1126\/science.352.6289.1067","volume":"352","author":"G Pinholster","year":"2016","unstructured":"Pinholster, G. (2016). Journals and funders confront implicit bias in peer review. Science, 352(6289), 1067\u20131068. doi:\n 10.1126\/science.352.6289.1067\n \n .","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1108\/ARLA-01-2015-0007","volume":"28","author":"C Pombo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pombo, C., & Ogliastri, E. (2015). Editorial note on desk rejection policy. Academia Revista Latinoamerica de Administraci\u00f3n, 28(1), 9\u201313. doi:\n 10.1108\/ARLA-01-2015-0007\n \n .","journal-title":"Academia Revista Latinoamerica de Administraci\u00f3n"},{"key":"9921_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0194599816669661","author":"KB Pytynia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Pytynia, K. B. (2017). Why participate in peer review as a journal manuscript reviewer what\u2019s in it for you? Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery. doi:\n 10.1177\/0194599816669661\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Otolaryngology\u2014Head and Neck Surgery"},{"issue":"54","key":"9921_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1590\/1678-987315235401","volume":"23","author":"RSP (Revista de Sociologia e Pol\u00edtica)","year":"2015","unstructured":"RSP (Revista de Sociologia e Pol\u00edtica). (2015). Editorial. Revista de Sociologia e Pol\u00edtica, 23(54), 3\u20138. doi:\n 10.1590\/1678-987315235401\n \n .","journal-title":"Revista de Sociologia e Pol\u00edtica"},{"key":"9921_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1186\/s12940-015-0035-6","volume":"14","author":"K Ruff","year":"2015","unstructured":"Ruff, K. (2015). Scientific journals and conflict of interest disclosure: What progress has been made? Environmental Health, 14, 45. doi:\n 10.1186\/s12940-015-0035-6\n \n .","journal-title":"Environmental Health"},{"key":"9921_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2309-y","author":"E Sarig\u00f6l","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sarig\u00f6l, E., Garcia, D., Scholtes, I., & Schweitzer, F. (2017). Quantifying the effect of editor\u2013author relations on manuscript handling times. Scientometrics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11192-017-2309-y\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"9921_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1175\/2009BAMS2908.1","volume":"91","author":"DM Schultz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Schultz, D. M. (2010). Rejection rates for journals publishing [sic] in the atmospheric sciences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91, 231\u2013243. doi:\n 10.1175\/2009BAMS2908.1\n \n .","journal-title":"Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society"},{"key":"9921_CR55","first-page":"257","volume":"11","author":"B Shakiba","year":"2008","unstructured":"Shakiba, B., Salmasian, H., Yousefi-Nooraie, R., & Rohanizadegan, M. (2008). Factors influencing editors\u2019 decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: The authors\u2019 perspective. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 11, 257\u2013262.","journal-title":"Archives of Iranian Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10805-010-9107-y","volume":"8","author":"AAC Teixeira","year":"2010","unstructured":"Teixeira, A. A. C., & da Costa, M. F. (2010). Who rules the ruler? On the misconduct of journal editors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 8(2), 111\u2013128. doi:\n 10.1007\/s10805-010-9107-y\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR57","first-page":"16","volume":"109","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2015","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015a). COPE code of conduct clause 3.1. under the microscope: A prelude to unfair rejections. Current Science, 109(1), 16\u201317.","journal-title":"Current Science"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.5901\/jesr.2015.v5n2p11","volume":"5","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2015","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015b). Make the cover letter extinct. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(2), 11\u201312. doi:\n 10.5901\/jesr.2015.v5n2p11\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Educational and Social Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.5294\/PEBI.2016.20.2.3","volume":"20","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2016","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016a). On the abuse of online submission systems, fake peer reviews and editor-created accounts. Persona y Bio\u00e9tica, 20(2), 151\u2013158. doi:\n 10.5294\/PEBI.2016.20.2.3\n \n .","journal-title":"Persona y Bio\u00e9tica"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1515\/jim-2016-0031","volume":"1","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2016","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016b). The militarization of science, and subsequent criminalization of scientists. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine, 1(2), 214\u2013215. doi:\n 10.1515\/jim-2016-0031\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.5901\/mjss.2017.v8n1p","volume":"8","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017a). COPE requires greater consistency and accountability. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 11\u201313. doi:\n 10.5901\/mjss.2017.v8n1p\n \n .","journal-title":"Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences"},{"issue":"2","key":"9921_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mjafi.2016.11.008","volume":"73","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017b). The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 73(2), 181\u2013183. doi:\n 10.1016\/j.mjafi.2016.11.008\n \n .","journal-title":"Medical Journal Armed Forces India"},{"key":"9921_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.21037\/amj.2017.02.10","volume":"2","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2017c). Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: Beware! AME Medical Journal, 2, 28. doi:\n 10.21037\/amj.2017.02.10\n \n .","journal-title":"AME Medical Journal"},{"key":"9921_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9821-y","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2017a). How are editors selected, recruited and approved? Science and Engineering Ethics (in press). doi:\n 10.1007\/s11948-016-9821-y\n \n .","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics (in press)"},{"key":"9921_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9842-6","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Al-Khatib, A. (2017b). Should authors be requested to suggest peer reviewers? Science and Engineering Ethics (in press). doi:\n 10.1007\/s11948-016-9842-6\n \n .","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics (in press)"},{"key":"9921_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-017-9873-7","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bern\u00e8s, S. (2017). Clarivate Analytics: Continued omnia vanitas impact factor culture. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:\n 10.1007\/s11948-017-9873-7\n \n . (in press).","journal-title":"Science and Engineering Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2014.899909","volume":"22","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2015","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobr\u00e1nszki, J. (2015). Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer\u00a0review. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 22(1), 22\u201340. doi:\n 10.1080\/08989621.2014.899909\n \n .","journal-title":"Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-016-9489-9","volume":"33","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobr\u00e1nszki, J. (2017). Excessively long editorial decisions and excessively long publication times by journals: Causes, risks, consequences, and proposed solutions. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(1), 101\u2013108. doi:\n 10.1007\/s12109-016-9489-9\n \n .","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9921_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1515\/ebce-2016-0011","volume":"6","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2016","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Katavi\u0107, V. (2016). Free editors and peers: Squeezing the lemon dry. Ethics & Bioethics, 6(3\u20134), 203\u2013209. doi:\n 10.1515\/ebce-2016-0011\n \n .","journal-title":"Ethics & Bioethics"},{"key":"9921_CR70","unstructured":"Thrower, P. (2012). Eight reason I rejected your article. \n https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/connect\/8-reasons-i-rejected-your-article\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR71","unstructured":"Uckelman, S. L. (2014). The value and cost of desk rejections. In Letters from the editors\u2014philosophy journal editors\u2019 perspectives on Academic Publishing. \n https:\/\/fromtheeditors.wordpress.com\/2014\/01\/24\/the-value-and-cost-of-desk-rejections\/\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"key":"9921_CR72","unstructured":"van Deursen, A. (2012). Desk rejected. \n https:\/\/avandeursen.com\/2012\/11\/23\/desk-rejected\/\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."},{"issue":"5303","key":"9921_CR73","first-page":"1055","volume":"275","author":"G Vogel","year":"1997","unstructured":"Vogel, G. (1997). Editorial ethics questioned. Science, 275(5303), 1055.","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"9921_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"348","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2008.028324","volume":"35","author":"E Wager","year":"2009","unstructured":"Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. (2009). Science journal editors\u2019 views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 348\u2013353. doi:\n 10.1136\/jme.2008.028324\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9921_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1440-1614.2001.00838.x","volume":"35","author":"G Walter","year":"2001","unstructured":"Walter, G., & Bloch, S. (2001). Publishing ethics in psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 35(1), 28\u201335. doi:\n 10.1046\/j.1440-1614.2001.00838.x\n \n .","journal-title":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry"},{"key":"9921_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.4033\/iee.2012.5.4.e","volume":"5","author":"DA Wardle","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wardle, D. A. (2012). On plummeting manuscript acceptance rates by the main ecological journals and the progress of ecology. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 13\u201315. doi:\n 10.4033\/iee.2012.5.4.e\n \n .","journal-title":"Ideas in Ecology and Evolution"},{"key":"9921_CR77","unstructured":"Ware, M. (2008). Peer review: benefits, perceptions and alternatives. PRC (publishing research consortium) summary papers 4, London, 20\u00a0pp."},{"issue":"21","key":"9921_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2790","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.287.21.2790","volume":"287","author":"EJ Weber","year":"2002","unstructured":"Weber, E. J., Katz, P. P., Waeckerle, J. F., & Callaham, M. L. (2002). Author perception of peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(21), 2790\u20132793. doi:\n 10.1001\/jama.287.21.2790\n \n .","journal-title":"Journal of the American Medical Association"},{"issue":"3","key":"9921_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.6880","volume":"97","author":"BL Wijnhoven","year":"2010","unstructured":"Wijnhoven, B. L., & Dejong, C. C. (2010). Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery. The British Journal of Surgery, 97(3), 450\u2013454. doi:\n 10.1002\/bjs.6880\n \n .","journal-title":"The British Journal of Surgery"},{"key":"9921_CR80","unstructured":"Winker, M. A., & Ferris, L. E. (2015). Promoting global health: The World Association of Medical Editors position on editors\u2019 responsibility. \n http:\/\/www.wame.org\/News\/Details\/15\n \n . Last accessed May 6, 2017."}],"container-title":["Science and Engineering Ethics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2018,8,14]],"date-time":"2018-08-14T09:27:28Z","timestamp":1534238848000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,3]]},"references-count":80,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2018,8]]}},"alternative-id":["9921"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-017-9921-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1353-3452","1471-5546"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1353-3452"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1471-5546"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,8,3]]}}}