{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,17]],"date-time":"2024-07-17T10:39:43Z","timestamp":1721212783941},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"7","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]],"date-time":"2019-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573776000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]],"date-time":"2019-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573776000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009244","name":"Stockholm University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009244","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]},"abstract":"Abstract<\/jats:title>The veil of ignorance argument was used by John C. Harsanyi to defend Utilitarianism and by John Rawls to defend the absolute priority of the worst off. In a recent paper, Lara Buchak revives the veil of ignorance argument, and uses it to defend an intermediate position between Harsanyi\u2019s and Rawls\u2019 that she calls Relative Prioritarianism. None of these authors explore the implications of allowing that agent\u2019s behind the veil are sensitive to ambiguity. Allowing foraversion<\/jats:italic>to ambiguity\u2014which is both the most commonly observed and a seemingly reasonable attitude to ambiguity\u2014however supports a version of Egalitarianism, whose logical form is quite different from the theories defended by the aforementioned authors. Moreover, it turns out that the veil of ignorance argument neither supports standard Utilitarianism nor Prioritarianism unless we assume that rational people are insensitive to ambiguity.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]],"date-time":"2019-11-15T21:02:41Z","timestamp":1573851761000},"page":"6159-6182","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Ambiguity aversion behind the veil of ignorance"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"198","author":[{"given":"H. Orri","family":"Stef\u00e1nsson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"2455_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195384994.001.0001","volume-title":"Well-being and fair distribution: Beyond cost-benefit analysis","author":"MD Adler","year":"2011","unstructured":"Adler, M. D. (2011). Well-being and fair distribution: Beyond cost-benefit analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1017\/S026626710999023X","volume":"25","author":"NI Al-Najjar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Al-Najjar, N. I., & Weinstein, J. (2009). The ambiguity aversion literature: A critical assessment. Economics and Philosophy, 25(3), 249\u2013284.","journal-title":"Economics and Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"2455_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"503","DOI":"10.2307\/1907921","volume":"21","author":"M Allais","year":"1953","unstructured":"Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l\u2019homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l\u2019\u00e9cole Am\u00e9ricaine. Econometrica, 21(4), 503\u2013546.","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"1","key":"2455_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177704255","volume":"34","author":"FJ Anscombe","year":"1963","unstructured":"Anscombe, F. J., & Aumann, R. J. (1963). A definition of subjective probability. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34(1), 199\u2013205.","journal-title":"The Annals of Mathematical Statistics"},{"key":"2455_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9781400833092","volume-title":"Rational Decisions","author":"K Binmore","year":"2008","unstructured":"Binmore, K. (2008). Rational Decisions. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1007\/s11166-012-9155-3","volume":"45","author":"K Binmore","year":"2012","unstructured":"Binmore, K., Voorhoeve, A., & Stewart, L. (2012). How much ambiguity aversion? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 45(3), 215\u201338.","journal-title":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty"},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1090\/S0002-9947-1966-0197671-9","volume":"124","author":"ED Bolker","year":"1966","unstructured":"Bolker, E. D. (1966). Functions resembling quotients of measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 124(2), 292\u2013312.","journal-title":"Transactions of the American Mathematical Society"},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s00355-003-0300-4","volume":"24","author":"R Bradley","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bradley, R. (2005). Bayesian utilitarianism and probability homogeneity. Social Choice and Welfare, 24(2), 221\u2013251.","journal-title":"Social Choice and Welfare"},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"231","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267115000358","volume":"32","author":"R Bradley","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bradley, R. (2016). Ellsberg\u2019s paradox and the value of chances. Economics and Philosophy, 32(2), 231\u2013248.","journal-title":"Economics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2455_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199672165.001.0001","volume-title":"Risk and rationality","author":"L Buchak","year":"2013","unstructured":"Buchak, L. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"610","DOI":"10.1086\/690070","volume":"127","author":"L Buchak","year":"2017","unstructured":"Buchak, L. (2017). Taking risks behind the veil of ignorance. Ethics, 127(3), 610\u2013644.","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"2455_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"643","DOI":"10.2307\/1884324","volume":"75","author":"D Ellsberg","year":"1961","unstructured":"Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643\u2013669.","journal-title":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics"},{"key":"2455_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-9792-9_3","volume-title":"Foundations and applications of decision theory","author":"L Ellsworth","year":"1978","unstructured":"Ellsworth, L. (1978). Decision-theoretic analysis of Rawls\u2019 original position. In A. Hooker, J. J. Leach, & E. F. McClennen (Eds.), Foundations and applications of decision theory (pp. 29\u201345). Dordrecht: D. Reidel."},{"issue":"1","key":"2455_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/caje.12314","volume":"51","author":"M Fleurbaey","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fleurbaey, M. (2018). Welfare economics, risk and uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Economics, 51(1), 5\u201340.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Economics"},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267109990241","volume":"25","author":"I Gilboa","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gilboa, I., Postlewaite, A., & Schmeidler, D. (2009). Is it always rational to satisfy Savage\u2019s axioms? Economics and Philosophy, 25(3), 285\u2013296.","journal-title":"Economics and Philosophy"},{"issue":"5","key":"2455_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"434","DOI":"10.1086\/257416","volume":"61","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1953","unstructured":"Harsanyi, J. C. (1953). Cardinal utility in welfare economics and in the theory of risk-taking. Journal of Political Economy, 61(5), 434\u2013435.","journal-title":"Journal of Political Economy"},{"issue":"4","key":"2455_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1086\/257678","volume":"63","author":"JC Harsanyi","year":"1955","unstructured":"Harsanyi, J. C. (1955). Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility. Journal of Political Economy, 63(4), 309\u2013321.","journal-title":"Journal of Political Economy"},{"key":"2455_CR18","first-page":"125","volume-title":"Egalitarianism: New essays on the nature and value of equality","author":"N Holtug","year":"2007","unstructured":"Holtug, N. (2007). Prioritarianism. In N. Holtug & K. Lippert-Rasmussen (Eds.), Egalitarianism: New essays on the nature and value of equality (pp. 125\u2013156). Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"2455_CR19","unstructured":"Jeffrey, R. (1990\/1965). The logic of decision. The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"2455_CR20","volume-title":"Studies in inductive logic and probability","author":"D Lewis","year":"1980","unstructured":"Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist\u2019s guide to objective chance. In R. C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability. California: University of California Press."},{"key":"2455_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"729","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-444-53685-3.00013-1","volume":"1","author":"M Machina","year":"2014","unstructured":"Machina, M., & Siniscalchi, M. (2014). Ambiguity and ambiguity aversion. Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 729\u2013807.","journal-title":"Handbook of the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty"},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1006\/jeth.1995.1044","volume":"66","author":"P Mongin","year":"1995","unstructured":"Mongin, P. (1995). Consistent Bayesian aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory, 66(2), 313\u2013351.","journal-title":"Journal of Economic Theory"},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"147","DOI":"10.1017\/S0266267101000219","volume":"17","author":"P Mongin","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mongin, P. (2001). The impartial observer theorem of social ethics. Economics and Philosophy, 17(2), 147\u2013179.","journal-title":"Economics and Philosophy"},{"key":"2455_CR24","unstructured":"Mongin, P., & Pivato, M. (ms.). Social preference under twofold uncertainty."},{"issue":"2","key":"2455_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1088-4963.2009.01154.x","volume":"37","author":"M Otsuka","year":"2009","unstructured":"Otsuka, M., & Voorhoeve, A. (2009). Why it matters that some are worse off than others: An argument against the priority view. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 37(2), 171\u2013199.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Public Affairs"},{"key":"2455_CR26","unstructured":"Parfit, D. (2002\/1991). Equality or priority? In Clayton, M., & Williams, A., (Eds.), The ideal of equality. New York: Palgrave."},{"issue":"1","key":"2455_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820800003368","volume":"14","author":"W Rabinowicz","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rabinowicz, W. (2002). Prioritarianism for prospects. Utilitas, 14(1), 2\u201321.","journal-title":"Utilitas"},{"key":"2455_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rawls, J. (1999\/1971). A theory of justice. Oxford University Press (revised edition).","DOI":"10.4159\/9780674042582"},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1111\/papa.12121","volume":"46","author":"T Rowe","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rowe, T., & Voorhoeve, A. (2018). Egalitarianism under severe uncertainty. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 46(3), 239\u2013268.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Public Affairs"},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.2307\/1911053","volume":"57","author":"D Schmeidler","year":"1989","unstructured":"Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57(3), 571\u2013587.","journal-title":"Econometrica"},{"issue":"4","key":"2455_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"602","DOI":"10.1086\/682915","volume":"82","author":"HO Stef\u00e1nsson","year":"2015","unstructured":"Stef\u00e1nsson, H. O., & Bradley, R. (2015). How valuable are chances? Philosophy of Science, 82(4), 602\u2013625.","journal-title":"Philosophy of Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"2455_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1093\/bjps\/axx035","volume":"70","author":"HO Stef\u00e1nsson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stef\u00e1nsson, H. O., & Bradley, R. (2019). What is risk aversion? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 70(1), 77\u2013102.","journal-title":"The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"2455_CR33","first-page":"89","volume-title":"Ambiguity attitudes, chapter 3","author":"ST Trautmann","year":"2015","unstructured":"Trautmann, S. T., & van de Kuilen, G. (2015). Ambiguity attitudes, chapter 3 (pp. 89\u2013116). New York: Wiley."},{"key":"2455_CR34","unstructured":"von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007\/1944). Games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press"},{"issue":"3","key":"2455_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1017\/S0953820812000040","volume":"24","author":"A Voorhoeve","year":"2012","unstructured":"Voorhoeve, A., & Fleurbaey, M. (2012). Egalitarianism and the separateness of persons. Utilitas, 24(3), 381\u2013398.","journal-title":"Utilitas"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,5]],"date-time":"2022-10-05T18:41:31Z","timestamp":1664995291000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7]]}},"alternative-id":["2455"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-019-02455-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 February 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 October 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}