{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T02:50:40Z","timestamp":1705891840042},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"11","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]],"date-time":"2015-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1427155200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Synthese"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,23]],"date-time":"2015-03-23T13:52:55Z","timestamp":1427118775000},"page":"3677-3693","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["On synchronic dogmatism"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"192","author":[{"given":"Rodrigo","family":"Borges","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"715_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-011-9923-7","volume":"188","author":"C Almeida de","year":"2011","unstructured":"de Almeida, C. (2011). Epistemic closure, skepticism and defeasibility. Synthese, 188, 197\u2013215.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"715_CR2","unstructured":"Borges R (2013). Dogmatism depuzzled. Manuscript."},{"issue":"24","key":"715_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.2307\/2024710","volume":"67","author":"F Dretske","year":"1970","unstructured":"Dretske, F. (1970). Epistemic operators. The Journal of Philosophy, 67(24), 1007\u20131023.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"715_CR4","volume-title":"Contemporary debates in epistemology","author":"F Dretske","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dretske, F. (2005). Is knowledge closed under known entailment? The case against closure. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"715_CR5","volume-title":"Thought","author":"G Harman","year":"1973","unstructured":"Harman, G. (1973). Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press."},{"key":"715_CR6","volume-title":"Knowledge and lotteries","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2004","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"715_CR7","volume-title":"Contemporary debates in epistemology","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J. (2005). The case for closure. In M. Steup & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"10","key":"715_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.5840\/jphil20081051022","volume":"105","author":"J Hawthorne","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hawthorne, J., & Stanley, J. (2008). Knowledge and action. Journal of Philosophy, 105(10), 571\u2013590.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"715_CR9","volume-title":"Knowledge and belief","author":"J Hintikka","year":"1962","unstructured":"Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief. Ithaca: Cornell University Press."},{"issue":"61","key":"715_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.2307\/2653657","volume":"2","author":"M Huemer","year":"2000","unstructured":"Huemer, M. (2000). Direct realism and the brain-in-a-vat argument. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2(61), 397\u2013413.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"},{"key":"715_CR11","volume-title":"Certainty: A refutation of scepticism","author":"PD Klein","year":"1981","unstructured":"Klein, P. D. (1981). Certainty: A refutation of scepticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press."},{"key":"715_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.5840\/philtopics19952315","volume":"23","author":"PD Klein","year":"1995","unstructured":"Klein, P. D. (1995). Skepticism and closure: Why the evil genius argument fails. Philosophical Topics, 23, 212\u2013236.","journal-title":"Philosophical Topics"},{"key":"715_CR13","volume-title":"Philosophical troubles","author":"S Kripke","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kripke, S. (2011). Philosophical troubles. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"242","key":"715_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/LXI.242.178","volume":"61","author":"N Malcolm","year":"1952","unstructured":"Malcolm, N. (1952). Knowledge and delief. Mind, 61(242), 178\u2013189.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"715_CR15","volume-title":"Philosophical explanations","author":"R Nozick","year":"1981","unstructured":"Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press."},{"key":"715_CR16","volume-title":"Contemporary theories of knowledge","author":"J Pollock","year":"1999","unstructured":"Pollock, J., & Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary theories of knowledge. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield."},{"key":"715_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-008-9330-1","volume":"148","author":"A Sharon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sharon, A., & Spectre, L. (2010). Dogmatism repuzzled. Philosophical Studies, 148, 307\u2013321.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"715_CR18","volume-title":"Blindspots","author":"R Sorensen","year":"1998","unstructured":"Sorensen, R. (1998). Blindspots. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"715_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"70","DOI":"10.1111\/phis.12004","volume":"23","author":"R Wedgwood","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wedgwood, R. (2013). Rational \u201cought\u201d implies \u201ccan\u201d. Philosophical Issues, 23(1), 70\u201392.","journal-title":"Philosophical Issues"},{"key":"715_CR20","volume-title":"Knowledge and its limits","author":"T Williamson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"715_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00205.x","volume":"65","author":"C Wright","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wright, C. (2002). (Anti-)sceptics simple and subtle: G.E. Moore and John McDowell. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65, 330\u2013348.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Phenomenological Research"}],"container-title":["Synthese"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,6,1]],"date-time":"2019-06-01T10:37:03Z","timestamp":1559385423000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,11]]}},"alternative-id":["715"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-015-0715-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-7857","1573-0964"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-7857","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0964","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,24]]}}}