乐胖代购免代理版

{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,15]],"date-time":"2024-09-15T13:59:18Z","timestamp":1726408758223},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":19,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783031148347"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783031148354"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-14835-4_8","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,24]],"date-time":"2022-08-24T12:05:36Z","timestamp":1661342736000},"page":"111-125","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Uncertainty Elicitation and\u00a0Propagation in\u00a0GSN Models of\u00a0Assurance Cases"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Yassir","family":"Idmessaoud","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Didier","family":"Dubois","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"J\u00e9r\u00e9mie","family":"Guiochet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"8_CR1","first-page":"67","volume":"1","author":"P Chatalic","year":"1987","unstructured":"Chatalic, P., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: An approach to approximate reasoning based on Dempster rule of combination. Int. J. Expert Syst. Res. Appl. 1, 67\u201385 (1987)","journal-title":"Int. J. Expert Syst. Res. Appl."},{"issue":"1","key":"8_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ress.2010.06.027","volume":"96","author":"L Cyra","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cyra, L., G\u00f3rski, J.: Support for argument structures review and assessment. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96(1), 26\u201337 (2011)","journal-title":"Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf."},{"key":"8_CR3","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-83903-1_3","volume-title":"Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","author":"M Damour","year":"2021","unstructured":"Damour, M., et al.: Towards certification of a reduced footprint ACAS-Xu system: a hybrid ML-based solution. In: Habli, I., Sujan, M., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2021. LNCS, vol. 12852, pp. 34\u201348. Springer, Cham (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-83903-1_3"},{"key":"8_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Denney, E., Pai, G., Habli, I.: Towards measurement of confidence in safety cases. In: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 380\u2013383. IEEE (2011)","DOI":"10.1109\/ESEM.2011.53"},{"key":"8_CR5","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-63194-3_5","volume-title":"Software Engineering in Health Care","author":"L Duan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Duan, L., Rayadurgam, S., Heimdahl, M.P.E., Ayoub, A., Sokolsky, O., Lee, I.: Reasoning about confidence and uncertainty in assurance cases: a survey. In: Huhn, M., Williams, L. (eds.) FHIES\/SEHC -2014. LNCS, vol. 9062, pp. 64\u201380. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-63194-3_5"},{"key":"8_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dubois, D., Faux, F., Prade, H., Rico, A.: A possibilistic counterpart to Shafer evidence theory. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 23\u201326 June 2019, pp. 1\u20136. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/FUZZ-IEEE.2019.8858931"},{"key":"8_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2016.09.014","volume":"92","author":"PJ Graydon","year":"2017","unstructured":"Graydon, P.J., Holloway, C.M.: An investigation of proposed techniques for quantifying confidence in assurance arguments. Saf. Sci. 92, 53\u201365 (2017)","journal-title":"Saf. Sci."},{"key":"8_CR8","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"313","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24255-2_23","volume-title":"Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","author":"J Guiochet","year":"2015","unstructured":"Guiochet, J., Do Hoang, Q.A., Kaaniche, M.: A model for safety case confidence assessment. In: Koornneef, F., van Gulijk, C. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9337, pp. 313\u2013327. Springer, Cham (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-24255-2_23"},{"key":"8_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10","volume-title":"Scalable Uncertainty Management","author":"Y Idmessaoud","year":"2020","unstructured":"Idmessaoud, Y., Dubois, D., Guiochet, J.: Belief functions for safety arguments confidence estimation: a comparative study. In: Davis, J., Tabia, K. (eds.) SUM 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12322, pp. 141\u2013155. Springer, Cham (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58449-8_10"},{"key":"8_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"269","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-88601-1_27","volume-title":"Belief Functions: Theory and Applications","author":"Y Idmessaoud","year":"2021","unstructured":"Idmessaoud, Y., Dubois, D., Guiochet, J.: Quantifying confidence of safety cases with belief functions. In: Den\u0153ux, T., Lef\u00e8vre, E., Liu, Z., Pichon, F. (eds.) BELIEF 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12915, pp. 269\u2013278. Springer, Cham (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-88601-1_27"},{"key":"8_CR11","unstructured":"Idmessaoud, Y., Guiochet, J., Dubois, D.: Questionnaire for estimating uncertainties in assurance cases, April 2022. https:\/\/hal.laas.fr\/hal-03649068"},{"key":"8_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-42337-1","volume-title":"Subjective Logic","author":"A J\u00f8sang","year":"2016","unstructured":"J\u00f8sang, A.: Subjective Logic. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-42337-1"},{"key":"8_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelly, T.: Arguing safety - a systematic approach to safety case management. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of York, UK (1998)","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-48249-0_2"},{"key":"8_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4471-0997-6_5","volume-title":"Safe Comp 1997","author":"TP Kelly","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A.: Safety case construction and reuse using patterns. In: Daniel, P. (ed.) Safe Comp 1997, pp. 55\u201369. Springer, London (1997). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4471-0997-6_5"},{"key":"8_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssci.2021.105187","volume":"138","author":"D Ne\u0161i\u0107","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ne\u0161i\u0107, D., Nyberg, M., Gallina, B.: A probabilistic model of belief in safety cases. Saf. Sci. 138, 105187 (2021)","journal-title":"Saf. Sci."},{"key":"8_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9780691214696","volume-title":"A Mathematical Theory of Evidence","author":"G Shafer","year":"1976","unstructured":"Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)"},{"key":"8_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2004.05.003","volume":"38","author":"P Smets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Smets, P.: Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 38, 133\u2013147 (2005)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"},{"key":"8_CR18","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-66266-4_4","volume-title":"Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","author":"R Wang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wang, R., Guiochet, J., Motet, G.: Confidence assessment framework for safety arguments. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10488, pp. 55\u201368. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-66266-4_4"},{"key":"8_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"46","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijar.2019.02.002","volume":"107","author":"R Wang","year":"2019","unstructured":"Wang, R., Guiochet, J., Motet, G., Sch\u00f6n, W.: Safety case confidence propagation based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 107, 46\u201364 (2019)","journal-title":"Int. J. Approximate Reasoning"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-031-14835-4_8","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,8,29]],"date-time":"2022-08-29T23:04:22Z","timestamp":1661814262000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-031-14835-4_8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783031148347","9783031148354"],"references-count":19,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-14835-4_8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"25 August 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"SAFECOMP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Munich","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Germany","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2022","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"6 June 2022","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 June 2022","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"41","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"safecomp2022","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/safecomp22.iks.fraunhofer.de\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"93","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"24","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"26% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3, 2","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"5, 5","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The review process was thorough with at least 3 reviewers with ensured independency (single blind). In April 2022 an on-line meeting took place for the final discussion and selection.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}