{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,28]],"date-time":"2025-03-28T03:10:57Z","timestamp":1743131457626,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":57,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030989965"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030989972"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-98997-2_7","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,21]],"date-time":"2022-03-21T10:02:39Z","timestamp":1647856959000},"page":"143-165","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Towards Reliable Results - A Comparative Analysis of Selected MCDA Techniques in the Camera Selection Problem"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4249-8364","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aleksandra","family":"B\u0105czkiewicz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4415-9414","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jaros\u0142aw","family":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5736-4014","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bart\u0142omiej","family":"Kizielewicz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7076-2519","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Wojciech","family":"Sa\u0142abun","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"7_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115088","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2021.115088","volume":"181","author":"S Faizi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Faizi, S., Sa\u0142abun, W., Nawaz, S., ur Rehman, A., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J.: Best-Worst method and Hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets. Expert Syst. Appli. 181, 115088 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eswa.2021.115088","journal-title":"Expert Syst. Appli."},{"key":"7_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125302","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.125302","volume":"292","author":"D Pamu\u010dar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Pamu\u010dar, D., Behzad, M., Bo\u017eani\u0107, D., Behzad, M.: Decision making to support sustainable energy policies corresponding to agriculture sector: case study in Iran\u2019s Caspian Sea coastline. J. Clean. Prod. 292, 125302 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.125302","journal-title":"J. Clean. Prod."},{"key":"7_CR3","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-15154-6_12","volume-title":"Information Technology for Management: Emerging Research and Applications","author":"E Ziemba","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ziemba, E.: Synthetic indexes for a sustainable information society: measuring ICT adoption and sustainability in Polish government units. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) AITM\/ISM -2018. LNBIP, vol. 346, pp. 214\u2013234. Springer, Cham (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-15154-6_12"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1080\/08874417.2017.1312635","volume":"59","author":"E Ziemba","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to the sustainable information society. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 59(2), 116\u2013126 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08874417.2017.1312635","journal-title":"J. Comput. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"7_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ziemba, E.: The contribution of ICT adoption to sustainability: households\u2019 perspective. Inf. Technol. People (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/ITP-02-2018-0090","DOI":"10.1108\/ITP-02-2018-0090"},{"key":"7_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pu\u0161ka, A., Stevi\u0107, \u017d., Pamu\u010dar, D.: Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 1\u201331 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10668-021-01902-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10668-021-01902-2"},{"key":"7_CR7","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence)","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"454","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-11289-3_46","volume-title":"Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications","author":"J W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","year":"2014","unstructured":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Jankowski, J., Piotrowski, Z.: The selection of multicriteria method based on unstructured decision problem description. In: Hwang, D., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, N.-T. (eds.) ICCCI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8733, pp. 454\u2013465. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-11289-3_46"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(98)00073-3","volume":"109","author":"A Guitouni","year":"1998","unstructured":"Guitouni, A., Martel, J.M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2), 501\u2013521 (1998). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0377-2217(98)00073-3","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"issue":"9","key":"7_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1549","DOI":"10.3390\/sym12091549","volume":"12","author":"W Sa\u0142abun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Sa\u0142abun, W., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Shekhovtsov, A.: Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods. Symmetry 12(9), 1549 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/sym12091549","journal-title":"Symmetry"},{"issue":"19","key":"7_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10512","DOI":"10.3390\/su131910512","volume":"13","author":"A Lombardi Netto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lombardi Netto, A., Salomon, V.A.P., Ortiz Barrios, M.A.: Multi-criteria analysis of green bonds: hybrid multi-method applications. Sustainability 13(19), 10512 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su131910512","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"528","DOI":"10.1007\/s12597-019-00371-6","volume":"56","author":"A Tu\u015f","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tu\u015f, A., Ayta\u00e7 Adal\u0131, E.: The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem. Opsearch 56(2), 528\u2013538 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12597-019-00371-6","journal-title":"Opsearch"},{"key":"7_CR12","series-title":"Intelligent Systems Reference Library","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-23338-3_6","volume-title":"New Frontiers in Information and Production Systems Modelling and Analysis","author":"J W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","year":"2016","unstructured":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Jankowski, J.: Guideline for MCDA method selection in production management area. In: R\u00f3\u017cewski, P., Novikov, D., Bakhtadze, N., Zaikin, O. (eds.) New Frontiers in Information and Production Systems Modelling and Analysis. ISRL, vol. 98, pp. 119\u2013138. Springer, Cham (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-23338-3_6"},{"key":"7_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2018.07.004","volume":"86","author":"J W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","year":"2019","unstructured":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zio\u0142o, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107\u2013124 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2018.07.004","journal-title":"Omega"},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1504\/IJBIS.2020.110172","volume":"35","author":"G Kumar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kumar, G., Parimala, N.: A weighted sum method MCDM approach for recommending product using sentiment analysis. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 35(2), 185\u2013203 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1504\/IJBIS.2020.110172","journal-title":"Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst."},{"key":"7_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-47540-0_4","volume-title":"Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions","author":"K Marsh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Marsh, K., Thokala, P., M\u00fchlbacher, A., Lanitis, T.: Incorporating preferences and priorities into MCDA: selecting an appropriate scoring and weighting technique. In: Marsh, K., Goetghebeur, M., Thokala, P., Baltussen, R. (eds.) Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support Healthcare Decisions, pp. 47\u201366. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-47540-0_4"},{"key":"7_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"102261","DOI":"10.1016\/j.omega.2020.102261","volume":"96","author":"M Cinelli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Cinelli, M., Kadzi\u0144ski, M., Gonzalez, M., S\u0142owi\u0144ski, R.: How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy. Omega 96, 102261 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.omega.2020.102261","journal-title":"Omega"},{"key":"7_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: Scoring method versus TOPSIS method in the evaluation of E-banking services. In: 2018 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 683\u2013689. IEEE (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15439\/2018F115","DOI":"10.15439\/2018F115"},{"issue":"9","key":"7_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3223","DOI":"10.3390\/su10093223","volume":"10","author":"J W\u0105tr\u00f3bski","year":"2018","unstructured":"W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Ziemba, E., Karczmarczyk, A., Jankowski, J.: An index to measure the sustainable information society: the Polish households case. Sustainability 10(9), 3223 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su10093223","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"7_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2616","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2019.09.254","volume":"159","author":"A Karczmarczyk","year":"2019","unstructured":"Karczmarczyk, A., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, E.: Comparative study of ICT and SIS measurement in Polish households using a MCDA-based approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. 159, 2616\u20132628 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2019.09.254","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"key":"7_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1903","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2020.09.230","volume":"176","author":"W Chmielarz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: The selection and comparison of the methods used to evaluate the quality of e-banking websites: the perspective of individual clients. Procedia Comput. Sci. 176, 1903\u20131922 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2020.09.230","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1016\/0377-2217(86)90044-5","volume":"24","author":"JP Brans","year":"1986","unstructured":"Brans, J.P., Vincke, P., Mareschal, B.: How to select and how to rank projects: the PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2), 228\u2013238 (1986). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0377-2217(86)90044-5","journal-title":"Eur. J. Oper. Res."},{"key":"7_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2016.04.026","volume":"89","author":"M Bagherikahvarin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Bagherikahvarin, M., De Smet, Y.: A ranking method based on DEA and PROMETHEE II (a rank based on DEA & PR. II). Measurement 89, 333\u2013342 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.measurement.2016.04.026","journal-title":"Measurement"},{"key":"7_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.06.007","volume":"131","author":"Z Andreopoulou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Andreopoulou, Z., Koliouska, C., Galariotis, E., Zopounidis, C.: Renewable energy sources: using PROMETHEE II for ranking websites to support market opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 131, 31\u201337 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.techfore.2017.06.007","journal-title":"Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1080\/15567249.2011.565297","volume":"10","author":"H Polatidis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Polatidis, H., Haralambidou, K., Haralambopoulos, D.: Multi-criteria decision analysis for geothermal energy: a comparison between the ELECTRE III and the PROMETHEE II methods. Energy Sources Part B 10(3), 241\u2013249 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15567249.2011.565297","journal-title":"Energy Sources Part B"},{"key":"7_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"112531","DOI":"10.1016\/j.enpol.2021.112531","volume":"158","author":"KF Sotiropoulou","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sotiropoulou, K.F., Vavatsikos, A.P.: Onshore wind farms GIS-Assisted suitability analysis using PROMETHEE II. Energy Policy 158, 112531 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.enpol.2021.112531","journal-title":"Energy Policy"},{"key":"7_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1334","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2021.08.137","volume":"192","author":"A B\u0105czkiewicz","year":"2021","unstructured":"B\u0105czkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B.: Towards sustainable energy consumption evaluation in Europe for industrial sector based on MCDA methods. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 1334\u20131346 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2021.08.137","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"1","key":"7_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.3390\/en15010378","volume":"15","author":"W Chmielarz","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: On the assessment of e-banking websites supporting sustainable development goals. Energies 15(1), 378 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/en15010378","journal-title":"Energies"},{"issue":"17","key":"7_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7000","DOI":"10.3390\/su12177000","volume":"12","author":"W Chmielarz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: Towards sustainability in E-banking website assessment methods. Sustainability 12(17), 7000 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12177000","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"7_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3881","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2020.10.093","volume":"176","author":"W Chmielarz","year":"2020","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: A hybrid method of assessing individual electronic banking services in 2019. The case of Poland. Procedia Comput. Sci. 176, 3881\u20133889 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2020.10.093","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"6","key":"7_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2014.11.057","volume":"42","author":"D Pamu\u010dar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Pamu\u010dar, D., \u0106irovi\u0107, G.: The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Syst. Appl. 42(6), 3016\u20133028 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eswa.2014.11.057","journal-title":"Expert Syst. Appl."},{"key":"7_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1016\/j.renene.2016.11.057","volume":"103","author":"L Gigovi\u0107","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gigovi\u0107, L., Pamu\u010dar, D., Bo\u017eani\u0107, D., Ljubojevi\u0107, S.: Application of the GIS-DANP-MABAC multi-criteria model for selecting the location of wind farms: a case study of Vojvodina, Serbia. Renew. Energy 103, 501\u2013521 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.renene.2016.11.057","journal-title":"Renew. Energy"},{"key":"7_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shahiri Tabarestani, E., Afzalimehr, H.: A comparative assessment of multi-criteria decision analysis for flood susceptibility modelling. Geocarto Int. 1\u201324 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10106049.2021.1923834","DOI":"10.1080\/10106049.2021.1923834"},{"issue":"6","key":"7_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2192","DOI":"10.3390\/jtaer16060122","volume":"16","author":"A B\u0105czkiewicz","year":"2021","unstructured":"B\u0105czkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., Shekhovtsov, A., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Sa\u0142abun, W.: Methodical aspects of MCDM based E-commerce recommender system. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 16(6), 2192\u20132229 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jtaer16060122","journal-title":"J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res."},{"key":"7_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1964","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2018.07.256","volume":"126","author":"W Chmielarz","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chmielarz, W., Zborowski, M.: Analysis of e-banking websites\u2019 quality with the application of the TOPSIS method-a practical study. Procedia Comput. Sci. 126, 1964\u20131976 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2018.07.256","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"key":"7_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dhanalakshmi, C.S., Madhu, P., Karthick, A., Mathew, M., Kumar, R.V.: A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS and EDAS as an auxiliary tool for pyrolysis material selection and its application. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 1\u201316 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13399-020-01009-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s13399-020-01009-0"},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"435","DOI":"10.15388\/Informatica.2015.57","volume":"26","author":"M Keshavarz Ghorabaee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z.: Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica 26(3), 435\u2013451 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15388\/Informatica.2015.57","journal-title":"Informatica"},{"key":"7_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"170","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.004","volume":"78","author":"S Tadi\u0107","year":"2019","unstructured":"Tadi\u0107, S., Krsti\u0107, M., Brnjac, N.: Selection of efficient types of inland intermodal terminals. J. Transp. Geogr. 78, 170\u2013180 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jtrangeo.2019.06.004","journal-title":"J. Transp. Geogr."},{"issue":"5","key":"7_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1986","DOI":"10.3390\/su12051986","volume":"12","author":"V Skvarciany","year":"2020","unstructured":"Skvarciany, V., Jurevi\u010dien\u0117, D., Volskyt\u0117, G.: Assessment of sustainable socioeconomic development in European Union countries. Sustainability 12(5), 1986 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12051986","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"7_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149068","DOI":"10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2021.149068","volume":"797","author":"R Krishankumar","year":"2021","unstructured":"Krishankumar, R., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Ravichandran, K.S.: Prioritization of zero-carbon measures for sustainable urban mobility using integrated double hierarchy decision framework and EDAS approach. Sci. Total Environ. 797, 149068 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.scitotenv.2021.149068","journal-title":"Sci. Total Environ."},{"key":"7_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"236","DOI":"10.1016\/j.procs.2018.05.193","volume":"132","author":"A Aggarwal","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aggarwal, A., Choudhary, C., Mehrotra, D.: Evaluation of smartphones in Indian market using EDAS. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 236\u2013243 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.procs.2018.05.193","journal-title":"Procedia Comput. Sci."},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.5267\/j.ijiec.2016.1.001","volume":"7","author":"P Karande","year":"2016","unstructured":"Karande, P., Zavadskas, E., Chakraborty, S.: A study on the ranking performance of some MCDM methods for industrial robot selection problems. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 7(3), 399\u2013422 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5267\/j.ijiec.2016.1.001","journal-title":"Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput."},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR42","first-page":"445","volume":"35","author":"WK Brauers","year":"2006","unstructured":"Brauers, W.K., Zavadskas, E.K.: The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Control. Cybern. 35(2), 445\u2013469 (2006)","journal-title":"Control. Cybern."},{"issue":"3","key":"7_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1166","DOI":"10.3390\/su14031166","volume":"14","author":"V Indrajayanthan","year":"2022","unstructured":"Indrajayanthan, V., Mohanty, N.K.: Assessment of clean energy transition potential in major power-producing states of India using multi-criteria decision analysis. Sustainability 14(3), 1166 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su14031166","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"key":"7_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brauers, W.K.M., Zavadskas, E.K., Peldschus, F., Turskis, Z.: Multi-objective optimization of road design alternatives with an application of the MOORA method (2008)","DOI":"10.3846\/isarc.20080626.541"},{"key":"7_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kizielewicz, B., B\u0105czkiewicz, A., Shekhovtsov, A., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Sa\u0142abun, W.: Towards the RES development: multi-criteria assessment of energy storage devices. In: 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), pp. 766\u2013771. IEEE (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/DASA53625.2021.9682220","DOI":"10.1109\/DASA53625.2021.9682220"},{"key":"7_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shekhovtsov, A., Wi\u0119ckowski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Sa\u0142abun, W.: Towards Reliable Decision-Making in the green urban transport domain. Facta Universitatis Ser. Mech. Eng. (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22190\/FUME210315056S","DOI":"10.22190\/FUME210315056S"},{"issue":"8","key":"7_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"977","DOI":"10.3846\/13923730.2015.1064468","volume":"21","author":"S Altuntas","year":"2015","unstructured":"Altuntas, S., Dereli, T., Yilmaz, M.K.: Evaluation of excavator technologies: application of data fusion based MULTIMOORA methods. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 21(8), 977\u2013997 (2015). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3846\/13923730.2015.1064468","journal-title":"J. Civ. Eng. Manag."},{"issue":"10","key":"7_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12974","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.04.096","volume":"38","author":"WW Wu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Wu, W.W.: Beyond Travel & Tourism competitiveness ranking using DEA, GST, ANN and Borda count. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 12974\u201312982 (2011). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eswa.2011.04.096","journal-title":"Expert Syst. Appl."},{"key":"7_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2018.12.002","volume":"51","author":"A Hafezalkotob","year":"2019","unstructured":"Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., Liao, H., Herrera, F.: An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: theory, developments, applications, and challenges. Inf. Fusion 51, 145\u2013177 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.inffus.2018.12.002","journal-title":"Inf. Fusion"},{"key":"7_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110916","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rser.2021.110916","volume":"143","author":"F Ecer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ecer, F.: A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 143, 110916 (2021). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rser.2021.110916","journal-title":"Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev."},{"issue":"2","key":"7_CR51","first-page":"116","volume":"20","author":"D Karabasevic","year":"2015","unstructured":"Karabasevic, D., Stanujkic, D., Urosevic, S., Maksimovic, M.: Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods. Acta Montanist. Slovaca 20(2), 116\u2013124 (2015)","journal-title":"Acta Montanist. Slovaca"},{"issue":"6","key":"7_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1555","DOI":"10.3390\/su11061555","volume":"11","author":"P Ziemba","year":"2019","unstructured":"Ziemba, P.: Towards strong sustainability management-a generalized PROSA method. Sustainability 11(6), 1555 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su11061555","journal-title":"Sustainability"},{"issue":"11","key":"7_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1755","DOI":"10.3390\/en10111755","volume":"10","author":"P Ziemba","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ziemba, P., W\u0105tr\u00f3bski, J., Zio\u0142o, M., Karczmarczyk, A.: Using the PROSA method in offshore wind farm location problems. Energies 10(11), 1755 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/en10111755","journal-title":"Energies"},{"key":"7_CR54","volume-title":"Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Methods, Examples and Python Implementations","author":"J Papathanasiou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Papathanasiou, J., Ploskas, N., et al.: Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Methods, Examples and Python Implementations, vol. 136. Springer, Cham (2018)"},{"issue":"23","key":"7_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6299","DOI":"10.3390\/en13236299","volume":"13","author":"P Ziemba","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ziemba, P.: Multi-criteria stochastic selection of electric vehicles for the sustainable development of local government and state administration units in Poland. Energies 13(23), 6299 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/en13236299","journal-title":"Energies"},{"issue":"1","key":"7_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.3390\/e12010053","volume":"12","author":"FH Lotfi","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lotfi, F.H., Fallahnejad, R.: Imprecise Shannon\u2019s entropy and multi attribute decision making. Entropy 12(1), 53\u201362 (2010). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/e12010053","journal-title":"Entropy"},{"issue":"8","key":"7_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3410","DOI":"10.3390\/su12083410","volume":"12","author":"H Lai","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lai, H., Liao, H., \u0160aparauskas, J., Banaitis, A., Ferreira, F.A., Al-Barakati, A.: Sustainable cloud service provider development by a Z-number-based DNMA method with Gini-coefficient-based weight determination. Sustainability 12(8), 3410 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/su12083410","journal-title":"Sustainability"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Information Technology for Management: Business and Social Issues"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-98997-2_7","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,21]],"date-time":"2022-03-21T10:03:45Z","timestamp":1647857025000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-98997-2_7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"ISBN":["9783030989965","9783030989972"],"references-count":57,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-98997-2_7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-1348"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-1356"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 March 2022","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"ISM","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Conference on Information Systems Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2 September 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"5 September 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"16","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ism2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/fedcsis.org\/2021\/ism","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"HotCRP","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"8","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"1","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"25% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2-4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}