{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,12]],"date-time":"2024-09-12T05:55:15Z","timestamp":1726120515721},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030731274"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030731281"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-73128-1_14","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,1]],"date-time":"2021-04-01T11:04:01Z","timestamp":1617275041000},"page":"191-207","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":4,"title":["SaPeer Approach for Training Requirements Analysts: An Application Tailored to a Low-resource Context"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"J\u00e9ssyka","family":"Vilela","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"http:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0636-5663","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alessio","family":"Ferrari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"16","key":"14_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3356","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ins.2011.04.005","volume":"181","author":"S Abrah\u00e3o","year":"2011","unstructured":"Abrah\u00e3o, S., Insfran, E., Cars\u00ed, J.A., Genero, M.: Evaluating requirements modeling methods based on user perceptions: a family of experiments. Inf. Sci. 181(16), 3356\u20133378 (2011)","journal-title":"Inf. Sci."},{"key":"14_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baldassarre, M.T., Carver, J., Dieste, O., Juristo, N.: Replication types: towards a shared taxonomy. In: EASE 2014, pp. 1\u20134 (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2601248.2601299"},{"key":"14_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P.: Inspectors academy: pedagogical design for requirements inspection training. In: IEEE RE 2020, pp. 215\u2013226. IEEE (2020)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE48521.2020.00032"},{"key":"14_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Donati, B.: Learning from mistakes: an empirical study of elicitation interviews performed by novices. In: IEEE RE 2018, pp. 182\u2013193. IEEE (2018)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2018.00027"},{"issue":"3","key":"14_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"259","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-019-00313-0","volume":"24","author":"M Bano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Donati, B.: Teaching requirements elicitation interviews: an empirical study of learning from mistakes. Requirements Eng. 24(3), 259\u2013289 (2019). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-019-00313-0","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-013-9290-8","volume":"19","author":"JC Carver","year":"2014","unstructured":"Carver, J.C., Juristo, N., Baldassarre, M.T., Vegas, S.: Replications of software engineering experiments. EMSE 19, 267\u2013276 (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-013-9290-8","journal-title":"EMSE"},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/s007660200004","volume":"7","author":"J Coughlan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Coughlan, J., Macredie, R.D.: Effective communication in requirements elicitation: a comparison of methodologies. Requirements Eng. 7(2), 47\u201360 (2002). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s007660200004","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M.: Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: empirical results derived from a systematic review. In: IEEE RE 2006, pp. 179\u2013188. IEEE (2006)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2006.17"},{"key":"14_CR9","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-58640-3_16","volume-title":"Design, User Experience, and Usability: Understanding Users and Contexts","author":"S De Ascaniis","year":"2017","unstructured":"De Ascaniis, S., Cantoni, L., Sutinen, E., Talling, R.: A lifelike experience to train user requirements elicitation skills. In: Marcus, A., Wang, W. (eds.) DUXU 2017. LNCS, vol. 10290, pp. 219\u2013237. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-58640-3_16"},{"key":"14_CR10","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_11","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"B Donati","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donati, B., Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Gnesi, S.: Common mistakes of student analysts in requirements elicitation interviews. In: Gr\u00fcnbacher, P., Perini, A. (eds.) REFSQ 2017. LNCS, vol. 10153, pp. 148\u2013164. Springer, Cham (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-54045-0_11"},{"issue":"5","key":"14_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2298","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-016-9451-7","volume":"22","author":"DM Fern\u00e1ndez","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fern\u00e1ndez, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298\u20132338 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-016-9451-7","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"14_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: Learning requirements elicitation interviews with role-playing, self-assessment and peer-review. In: IEEE RE 2019, pp. 28\u201339. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2019.00015"},{"key":"14_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-020-00334-0","volume":"25","author":"A Ferrari","year":"2020","unstructured":"Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: Sapeer and reversesapeer: teaching requirements elicitation interviews with role-playing and role reversal. Requirements Eng. 25, 1\u201322 (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-020-00334-0","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"issue":"3","key":"14_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-016-0249-3","volume":"21","author":"A Ferrari","year":"2016","unstructured":"Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Gnesi, S.: Ambiguity and tacit knowledge in requirements elicitation interviews. Requirements Eng. 21(3), 333\u2013355 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-016-0249-3","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR15","unstructured":"Ferrari, A., Spoletini, P., Bano, M., Zowghi, D.: Sapeer approach for training students in requirements elicitation interviews\u2013educational material (2020). https:\/\/zenodo.org\/record\/3765214"},{"key":"14_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gabrysiak, G., Giese, H., Seibel, A., Neumann, S.: Teaching requirements engineering with virtual stakeholders without software engineering knowledge. In: REET 2010, pp. 36\u201345. IEEE (2010)","DOI":"10.1109\/REET.2010.5633109"},{"issue":"5","key":"14_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1002\/cae.22304","volume":"28","author":"I Garcia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Garcia, I., Pacheco, C., M\u00e9ndez, F., Calvo-Manzano, J.A.: The effects of game-based learning in the acquisition of \u201csoft skills\u201d on undergraduate software engineering courses: a systematic literature review. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 28(5), 1327\u20131354 (2020)","journal-title":"Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ."},{"issue":"10","key":"14_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1823","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2013.05.003","volume":"55","author":"I Hadar","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hadar, I., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Kuflik, T., Perini, A., Ricca, F., Susi, A.: Comparing the comprehensibility of requirements models expressed in use case and tropos: results from a family of experiments. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55(10), 1823\u20131843 (2013)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-012-0163-2","volume":"19","author":"I Hadar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hadar, I., Soffer, P., Kenzi, K.: The role of domain knowledge in requirements elicitation via interviews: an exploratory study. Requirements Eng. 19(2), 143\u2013159 (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-012-0163-2","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hertz, K., Spoletini, P.: Are requirements engineering courses covering what industry needs? a preliminary analysis of the United States situation. In: REET 2018, pp. 20\u201323. IEEE (2018)","DOI":"10.1109\/REET.2018.00008"},{"issue":"6","key":"14_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3768","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-018-9623-8","volume":"23","author":"W Hu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hu, W., Carver, J.C., Anu, V., Walia, G.S., Bradshaw, G.L.: Using human error information for error prevention. Empir. Softw. Eng. 23(6), 3768\u20133800 (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-018-9623-8","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"issue":"3","key":"14_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-017-0271-0","volume":"22","author":"C Khatwani","year":"2017","unstructured":"Khatwani, C., Jin, X., Niu, N., Koshoffer, A., Newman, L., Savolainen, J.: Advancing viewpoint merging in requirements engineering: a theoretical replication and explanatory study. Requirements Eng. 22(3), 317\u2013338 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-017-0271-0","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nakamura, T., Kai, U., Tachikawa, Y.: Requirements engineering education using expert system and role-play training. In: IEEE TALE 2014, pp. 375\u2013382. IEEE (2014)","DOI":"10.1109\/TALE.2014.7062566"},{"key":"14_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nkamaura, T., Tachikawa, Y.: Requirements engineering education using role-play training. In: IEEE TALE 2016, pp. 231\u2013238. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/TALE.2016.7851799"},{"key":"14_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ouhbi, S.: Evaluating role playing efficiency to teach requirements engineering. In: 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1007\u20131010. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/EDUCON.2019.8725045"},{"issue":"2","key":"14_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-013-0192-5","volume":"20","author":"S Ouhbi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ouhbi, S., Idri, A., Fern\u00e1ndez-Alem\u00e1n, J.L., Toval, A.: Requirements engineering education: a systematic mapping study. Requirements Eng. 20(2), 119\u2013138 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-013-0192-5","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ouhbi, S., Pombo, N.: Software engineering education: challenges and perspectives. In: 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 202\u2013209. IEEE (2020)","DOI":"10.1109\/EDUCON45650.2020.9125353"},{"key":"14_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Regev, G., Gause, D.C., Wegmann, A.: Requirements engineering education in the 21st century, an experiential learning approach. In: IEEE RE 2008, pp. 85\u201394. IEEE (2008)","DOI":"10.1109\/RE.2008.28"},{"key":"14_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"106361","DOI":"10.1016\/j.infsof.2020.106361","volume":"126","author":"S Rueda","year":"2020","unstructured":"Rueda, S., Panach, J.I., Distante, D.: Requirements elicitation methods based on interviews in comparison: a family of experiments. Inf. Softw. Technol. 126, 106361 (2020)","journal-title":"Inf. Softw. Technol."},{"key":"14_CR30","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-77243-1_7","volume-title":"Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","author":"P Spoletini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Spoletini, P., Ferrari, A., Bano, M., Zowghi, D., Gnesi, S.: Interview review: an empirical study on detecting ambiguities in requirements elicitation interviews. In: Kamsties, E., Horkoff, J., Dalpiaz, F. (eds.) REFSQ 2018. LNCS, vol. 10753, pp. 101\u2013118. Springer, Cham (2018). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-77243-1_7"},{"issue":"4","key":"14_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"475","DOI":"10.1007\/s00766-016-0248-4","volume":"22","author":"RB Svensson","year":"2017","unstructured":"Svensson, R.B., Regnell, B.: Is role playing in requirements engineering education increasing learning outcome? Requirements Eng. 22(4), 475\u2013489 (2017). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00766-016-0248-4","journal-title":"Requirements Eng."},{"key":"14_CR32","unstructured":"Vilela, J., Lopes, J.: Evaluating the students\u2019 experience with a requirements elicitation and communication game. In: Conferencia Iberoamericana de Software Engineering (CIBSE). CIBSE (2020)"},{"issue":"4","key":"14_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"625","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-012-9202-3","volume":"18","author":"GS Walia","year":"2013","unstructured":"Walia, G.S., Carver, J.C.: Using error abstraction and classification to improve requirement quality: conclusions from a family of four empirical studies. Empir. Softw. Eng. 18(4), 625\u2013658 (2013). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10664-012-9202-3","journal-title":"Empir. Softw. Eng."},{"key":"14_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2","volume-title":"Experimentation in Software Engineering","author":"C Wohlin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., H\u00f6st, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wessl\u00e9n, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-29044-2"},{"key":"14_CR35","unstructured":"Zowghi, D., Paryani, S.: Teaching requirements engineering through role playing: Lessons learnt. In: IEEE RE 2003, pp. 233\u2013241. IEEE (2003)"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Computer Science","Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-73128-1_14","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,3,13]],"date-time":"2024-03-13T15:01:02Z","timestamp":1710342062000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-73128-1_14"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030731274","9783030731281"],"references-count":35,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-73128-1_14","relation":{},"ISSN":["0302-9743","1611-3349"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0302-9743"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1611-3349"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 April 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"REFSQ","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"12 April 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"15 April 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"refsq2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/2021.refsq.org\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"50","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"22% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}