{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T03:24:50Z","timestamp":1743045890994,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":23,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030564407"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030564414"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-56441-4_46","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,9]],"date-time":"2020-08-09T23:02:37Z","timestamp":1597014157000},"page":"617-628","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Towards a Model Based Process Assessment for Data Analytics: An Exploratory Case Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Mert Onuralp","family":"G\u00f6kalp","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Kerem","family":"Kayabay","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ebru","family":"G\u00f6kalp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Altan","family":"Ko\u00e7yi\u011fit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"P. Erhan","family":"Eren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"46_CR1","unstructured":"Manyika, J., Chui, M., Joshi, R.: Modeling the global economic impact of AI. McKinsey (2018). https:\/\/www.mckinsey.com\/featured-insights\/artificial-intelligence\/notes-from-the-AI-frontier-modeling-the-impact-of-ai-on-the-world-economy. Accessed 25 Dec 2019"},{"key":"46_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gokalp, M.O., Kayabay, K., Akyol, M.A., et al.: Big data for Industry 4.0: a conceptual framework. In: 2016 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 431\u2013434. IEEE (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/CSCI.2016.0088"},{"key":"46_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"H\u00fcner, K.M., Ofner, M., Otto, B.: Towards a maturity model for corporate data quality management. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 231\u2013238. ACM (2009)","DOI":"10.1145\/1529282.1529334"},{"key":"46_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1988","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.1988","volume":"31","author":"AA Khan","year":"2019","unstructured":"Khan, A.A., Keung, J., Niazi, M., et al.: GSEPIM: a roadmap for software process assessment and improvement in the domain of global software development. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31, e1988 (2019)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"46_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1984","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.1984","volume":"31","author":"B Barafort","year":"2019","unstructured":"Barafort, B., Mesquida, A., Mas, A.: ISO 31000-based integrated risk management process assessment model for IT organizations. J. Softw. Evol. Process 31, e1984 (2019)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"46_CR6","unstructured":"Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE process assessment model. Final Release, v4 4:46 (2010)"},{"key":"46_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1002\/spip.439","volume":"22","author":"F Mc Caffery","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mc Caffery, F., Dorling, A.: Medi SPICE development. J. Softw. Evol. Process 22, 255\u2013268 (2010)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"46_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.csi.2016.11.011","volume":"54","author":"E G\u00f6kalp","year":"2017","unstructured":"G\u00f6kalp, E., Demir\u00f6rs, O.: Model based process assessment for public financial and physical resource management processes. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 54, 186\u2013193 (2017)","journal-title":"Comput. Stand. Interfaces"},{"key":"46_CR9","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC: ISO\/IEC 33001:2015 information technology \u2013 process assessment \u2013 concepts and terminology (2015)"},{"key":"46_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.570","volume":"25","author":"M Korsaa","year":"2013","unstructured":"Korsaa, M., Johansen, J., Schweigert, T., et al.: The people aspects in modern process improvement management approaches. J. Softw. Evol. Process 25, 381\u2013391 (2013)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"46_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2177","DOI":"10.1002\/smr.2177","volume":"32","author":"T Varkoi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Varkoi, T., M\u00e4kinen, T., Cameron, F., Nevalainen, R.: Validating effectiveness of safety requirements\u2019 compliance evaluation in process assessments. J. Softw. Evol. Process 32, e2177 (2020)","journal-title":"J. Softw. Evol. Process"},{"key":"46_CR12","unstructured":"Ahern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R.: CMMI. SEI Ser. Softw. Eng. (2001)"},{"key":"46_CR13","series-title":"Communications in Computer and Information Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-13036-1_9","volume-title":"Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination","author":"E G\u00f6kalp","year":"2014","unstructured":"G\u00f6kalp, E., Demir\u00f6rs, O.: Government process capability model: an exploratory case study. In: Mitasiunas, A., Rout, T., O\u2019Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2014. CCIS, vol. 477, pp. 94\u2013105. Springer, Cham (2014). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-13036-1_9"},{"key":"46_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1080\/10580530.2011.585583","volume":"28","author":"T Lukman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lukman, T., Hackney, R., Popovi\u010d, A., et al.: Business intelligence maturity: the economic transitional context within Slovenia. Inf. Syst. Manag. 28, 211\u2013222 (2011)","journal-title":"Inf. Syst. Manag."},{"key":"46_CR15","unstructured":"Cosic, R., Shanks, G., Maynard, S.: Towards a business analytics capability maturity model. In: 2012 Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2012), pp. 1\u201311. ACIS (2012)"},{"key":"46_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Raber, D., Winter, R., Wortmann, F.: Using quantitative analyses to construct a capability maturity model for business intelligence. In: 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4219\u20134228. IEEE (2012)","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2012.630"},{"key":"46_CR17","unstructured":"Halper, B.F., Stodder, D.: A Guide to Achieving Big Data Analytics Maturity (TDWI Benchmark Guide) (2016). https:\/\/tdwi.org\/whitepapers\/2018\/01\/aa-all-ms-a-guide-to-achieving-big-data-analytics-maturity.aspx. Accessed 6 May 2019"},{"key":"46_CR18","unstructured":"Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G.: Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning. Harvard Business Press (2007)"},{"key":"46_CR19","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC: ISO\/IEC 33002:2015 - information technology \u2013 process assessment \u2013 requirements for performing process assessment (2016)"},{"key":"46_CR20","unstructured":"Wirth, R., Hipp, J.: CRISP-DM: towards a standard process model for data mining. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on the Practical Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 29\u201339. Citeseer (2000)"},{"key":"46_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"G\u00f6kalp, M.O., Kayabay, K., Zaki, M., et al.: Open-source big data analytics architecture for businesses. In: 2019 1st International Informatics and Software Engineering Conference (UBMYK), pp. 1\u20136. IEEE (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/UBMYK48245.2019.8965572"},{"key":"46_CR22","unstructured":"ISO\/IEC TR 15504-5:1999: Information technology\u2014software process assessment\u2014part 5: an assessment model and indicator guidance (1999)"},{"key":"46_CR23","unstructured":"Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J.: SPI Manifesto. Eur. Syst. Softw. Process Improv. Innov. (2010)"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-56441-4_46","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,10,5]],"date-time":"2023-10-05T13:57:30Z","timestamp":1696514250000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-56441-4_46"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030564407","9783030564414"],"references-count":23,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-56441-4_46","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 August 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"EuroSPI","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"European Conference on Software Process Improvement","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"D\u00fcsseldorf","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Germany","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2020","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"9 September 2020","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"11 September 2020","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"27","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"eurospi2020","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/2020.eurospi.net\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Proprietary system","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"100","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"50","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"13","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"50% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"4","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"The conference was partially held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}