In the past five years, Ahmed Mansoor, a human rights activist in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has been jailed and fired from his job, along with having his passport confiscated, his car stolen, his e-mail hacked, his location tracked and his bank account robbed of US$140,000. He has also been beaten twice in the same week.
Mansoor’s experience has become a cautionary tale for dissidents, journalists and human-rights activists. It used to be that only a handful of countries had access to sophisticated hacking and spying tools. However, these days, nearly all kinds of countries, be they small, oil-rich nations like the UAE, or poor but populous countries like Ethiopia, are buying commercial spyware or hiring and training programmers to develop their own hacking and surveillance tools.
The barriers to join the global surveillance apparatus have never been lower. Dozens of companies, ranging from NSO Group and Cellebrite in Israel to Finfisher in Germany and Hacking Team in Italy, sell digital spy tools to governments.
Illustration: Mountain People
A number of companies in the US are training foreign law enforcement and intelligence officials to code their own surveillance tools. In many cases these tools are able to circumvent security measures such as encryption. Some countries are using them to watch dissidents. Others are using them to aggressively silence and punish their critics, inside and outside their borders.
“There’s no substantial regulation,” said Bill Marczak, a senior fellow at the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs, who has been tracking the spread of spyware around the globe.
“Any government who wants spyware can buy it outright or hire someone to develop it for you,” he said. “When we see the poorest countries deploying spyware, it’s clear money is no longer a barrier.”
Marczak examined Mansoor’s e-mails and found that, before his arrest, he had been targeted by spyware sold by Finfisher and Hacking Team, which sell surveillance tools to governments for comparably cheap six and seven-figure sums. Both companies sell tools that turn computers and telephones into listening devices that can monitor a target’s messages, calls and whereabouts.
In 2011, in the midst of the Arab Spring, Mansoor was arrested with four others on charges of insulting UAE rulers. He and the others had called for universal suffrage. They were quickly released and pardoned after international pressure.
However, Mansoor’s real troubles began shortly after his release. He was beaten and robbed of his car, and US$140,000 was stolen from his bank account. He did not learn that he was being monitored until a year later, when Marczak found the spyware on his devices.
“It was as bad as someone encroaching in your living room, a total invasion of privacy, and you begin to learn that maybe you shouldn’t trust anyone anymore,” Mansoor said.
Marczak was able to trace the spyware back to the Royal Group, a conglomerate run by a member of the al-Nahyan family, one of the six ruling families of the UAE. Representatives from the UAE embassy in Washington said they were still investigating the matter and did not return requests for further comment.
Invoices from Hacking Team showed that throughout last year, the UAE were Hacking Team’s second-biggest customers, behind only Morocco, and they paid Hacking Team more than US$634,500 to deploy spyware on 1,100 people. The invoices came to light last year after Hacking Team itself was hacked and thousands of internal e-mails and contracts were leaked online.
Hacking Team spokesman Eric Rabe said his company no longer had contracts with the UAE, but that is in large part because Hacking Team’s global license was this year revoked by the Italian Ministry of Economic Development.
For now, Hacking Team can no longer sell its tools outside Europe, and its chief executive officer, David Vincenzetti, is under investigation for some of those deals.
New evidence suggests to Marczak that the UAE might now be developing their own custom spyware to monitor their critics at home and abroad.
“The UAE have gotten much more sophisticated since we first caught them using Hacking Team software in 2012,” Marczak said. “They’ve clearly upped their game. They’re not on the level of the United States or the Russians, but they’re clearly moving up the chain.”
Late last year, Marczak was contacted by Rori Donaghy, a London-based journalist who writes for the Middle East Eye, an online news Web site, and a founder of the Emirates Center for Human Rights, an independent organization that tracks human rights abuses in the UAE. Donaghy asked Marczak to examine suspicious e-mails he had received from a fictitious organization called the Right to Fight. The e-mails asked him to click on links about a panel on human rights.
Marczak found that the e-mails were laden with highly customized spyware, unlike the off-the-shelf varieties he has become accustomed to finding on the computers of journalists and dissidents. As Marczak examined the spyware further, he found that it was being deployed from 67 servers and that the e-mails had baited more than 400 people into clicking its links and unknowingly loading its malware onto their machines.
He also found that 24 Emiratis were being targeted with the same spyware on Twitter. At least three of those targeted were arrested shortly after the surveillance began; another was later convicted of insulting UAE rulers in absentia.
Marczak and the Citizen Lab plan to release details of the custom UAE spyware online on Monday next week. He has developed a tool he called Himaya — an Arabic word that roughly means “protection” — that will allow others to see if they are being targeted as well.
Donaghy said he was frightened by Marczak’s findings, but not surprised.
“Once you dig beneath the surface, you find an autocratic state, with power centralized among a handful of people who have increasingly used their wealth for surveillance in sophisticated ways,” Donaghy said.
The UAE have cultivated an image as progressive allies of the US in the Middle East. Their rulers often highlight their sizable foreign aid budget and their women’s rights efforts. However, human rights monitors say the UAE have been aggressive in trying to neutralize their critics.
“The UAE has taken some of the most dramatic steps to shut down individual human rights activists and dissenting voices,” said James Lynch, deputy director for Amnesty International’s program in the Middle East and North Africa. “It is highly sensitive to its image and fully aware of who is criticizing the country from abroad.”
Last summer, Lynch was invited to speak about labor rights at a construction conference in Dubai and was turned away at the airport. Officials did not give a reason, but he later saw that his deportation certificate listed reasons of security.
Mansoor, who still lives in the UAE, has been outspoken about the use of spyware, but is increasingly limited in what he can do.
He worries that anyone he speaks to will also become a target.
More recently, the state has started punishing the families of those who speak out, as well. In March, the UAE revoked the passports of three siblings whose father was charged with attempting to overthrow the state.
“You’ll wake up one day and find yourself labeled a terrorist,” Mansoor said. “Despite the fact you don’t even know how to put a bullet inside a gun.”
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.
RSS