Data on the design and operation of drones by both individuals and teams - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 27:36:107008.
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107008. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Data on the design and operation of drones by both individuals and teams

Affiliations

Data on the design and operation of drones by both individuals and teams

Guanglu Zhang et al. Data Brief. .

Abstract

Human subject experiments are performed to assess the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) agents on distributed human design teams and individual human designers. In the team experiment, participants in teams of six develop and operate a drone fleet to deliver parcels routed to multiple locations of a target market. Among the design teams in the experiment, half of the design teams are human-only teams with no available AI agent. The other half of the design teams, designated as hybrid teams, have drone design and operation AI agents to advise them. Halfway through the team experiment, team structure is changed unexpectedly, requiring participants to adapt to the change. In the individual experiment, participants develop drones based on given design specifications, either on their own or with the availability of a drone design AI agent to advise them. During these experiments, participants configure, test, and share their designs and communicate with their teammates through an online research platform. The platform collects a step-by-step log of the actions made by participants. This article contains data sets collected from 44 teams (264 participants) in the team experiment and 73 participants in the individual experiment. These data sets can be used for behavioral analysis, sequence-based analysis, and natural language processing.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Collaborative design; Design teams; Engineering design; Human–computer interaction; Team agility; Team structures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig. 1
Initial customer location map.
Fig 2
Fig. 2
The open team structure (referred to as Structure A in Supplementary Material). All team members can communicate directly with each other. The solid arrows represent the communication channels between team members. The dash arrows represent the access to interface modules.
Fig 3
Fig. 3
The restrictive team structure (referred to as Structure B in Supplementary Material). Only particular members can communicate with one another through explicit channels. The solid arrows represent the communication channels between team members. The dash arrows represent the access to interface modules.
Fig 4
Fig. 4
Time allocation of the team experiment.
Fig 5
Fig. 5
Time allocation of the individual experiment.
Fig 6
Fig. 6
Example drone configuration defined by a string.
Fig 7
Fig. 7
Grammar rules used by the Lark parser.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Song B., Soria Zurita N.F., Zhang G., Stump G., Balon C., Miller S.W., Yukish M., Cagan J., McComb C. Proceedings of the Design Society: Design Conference. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press; 2020. Toward hybrid teams: a platform to understand human-computer collaboration during the design of complex engineered systems; pp. 1551–1560. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources