Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review
- PMID: 30910279
- DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.012
Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: Wearable trackers as research or clinical tools are increasingly used to support the care of older adults, due to their practicality in self-monitoring and potential to promote healthy lifestyle behaviours. However, there is limited understanding of appropriate data collection and analysis methods in different contexts.
Aim: To summarise evidence on wearable data generation and management in older adults, focusing on physical activity (PA), electrocardiogram (ECG), and vital signs monitoring. In addition to examine the accuracy and utility of wearable trackers in the care of older people.
Methods: A systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed and a manual search were conducted. Twenty studies on the use of wearable trackers by older adults met the inclusion criteria.
Results: Methodological designs for data collection and analysis were heterogeneous, with diverse definitions of wear and no-wear time, the number and type of valid days, and proprietary algorithms. Wearable trackers had adequate accuracy for measuring step counts, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), ECG and heart rate (HR), but not for respiratory rate. Participants reported ease of use and had high-level adherence over daily long-term use. Moreover, wearable trackers encouraged users to increase their daily level of physical activity and decrease waist circumference, facilitating atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnoses and predicting length of stay.
Conclusion: Wearable trackers are multi-dimensional technologies offering a viable and promising approach for sustained and scaled monitoring of older people's health. Frameworks and/or guidelines, including standards for the design, data management and application of use specifically for older adults, are required to enhance validity and reliability.
Keywords: Monitor; Older; Physical activity; Sensor; Tracker; Wearable.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):e22488. doi: 10.2196/22488. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 33464216 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 5;7(4):e9832. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9832. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30950807 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and acceptability of using wearable activity trackers in older adults living in retirement communities: a mixed method study.BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 21;22(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02931-w. BMC Geriatr. 2022. PMID: 35313819 Free PMC article.
-
Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review.Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104696. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104696. Epub 2022 Jan 31. Int J Med Inform. 2022. PMID: 35121356 Review.
-
The effectiveness of wearable activity trackers for increasing physical activity and reducing sedentary time in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Digit Health. 2023 May 22;9:20552076231176705. doi: 10.1177/20552076231176705. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37252261 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A narrative synthesis systematic review of digital self-monitoring interventions for middle-aged and older adults.Internet Interv. 2019 Oct 19;18:100283. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100283. eCollection 2019 Dec. Internet Interv. 2019. PMID: 31890630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating the Validity and Utility of Wearable Technology for Continuously Monitoring Patients in a Hospital Setting: Systematic Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 18;9(8):e17411. doi: 10.2196/17411. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34406121 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate Measurements Using Two Types of Wearable Devices.Prog Rehabil Med. 2022 Apr 7;7:20220016. doi: 10.2490/prm.20220016. eCollection 2022. Prog Rehabil Med. 2022. PMID: 35434406 Free PMC article.
-
The willingness to continue using wearable devices among the elderly: SEM and FsQCA analysis.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02336-8. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023. PMID: 37845659 Free PMC article.
-
How is the usability of commercial activity monitors perceived by older adults and by researchers? A cross-sectional evaluation of community-living individuals.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):e063135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063135. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36323474 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous