Evaluation of a Dry EEG System for Application of Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Autonomous Driving - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb 28:11:78.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00078. eCollection 2017.

Evaluation of a Dry EEG System for Application of Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Autonomous Driving

Affiliations

Evaluation of a Dry EEG System for Application of Passive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Autonomous Driving

Thorsten O Zander et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

We tested the applicability and signal quality of a 16 channel dry electroencephalography (EEG) system in a laboratory environment and in a car under controlled, realistic conditions. The aim of our investigation was an estimation how well a passive Brain-Computer Interface (pBCI) can work in an autonomous driving scenario. The evaluation considered speed and accuracy of self-applicability by an untrained person, quality of recorded EEG data, shifts of electrode positions on the head after driving-related movements, usability, and complexity of the system as such and wearing comfort over time. An experiment was conducted inside and outside of a stationary vehicle with running engine, air-conditioning, and muted radio. Signal quality was sufficient for standard EEG analysis in the time and frequency domain as well as for the use in pBCIs. While the influence of vehicle-induced interferences to data quality was insignificant, driving-related movements led to strong shifts in electrode positions. In general, the EEG system used allowed for a fast self-applicability of cap and electrodes. The assessed usability of the system was still acceptable while the wearing comfort decreased strongly over time due to friction and pressure to the head. From these results we conclude that the evaluated system should provide the essential requirements for an application in an autonomous driving context. Nevertheless, further refinement is suggested to reduce shifts of the system due to body movements and increase the headset's usability and wearing comfort.

Keywords: EEG; ERP; autonomous driving; passive BCI; usability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the used EEG system, the Brain Products actiCAP Xpress. Image courtesy of Brain Products GmbH.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The different QuickBit types provided with the actiCAP Xpress. Image courtesy of Brain Products GmbH.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Experiment timeline.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Examples for signal quality ratings on a scale from one to five. Green colored parts indicate adequate signal quality, yellow parts moderate signal quality, and red parts unacceptable signal quality.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Oddball Paradigm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Induced Alpha Paradigm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Shifts in electrode positions after self application in mm compared to application by investigator.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Grand average ERPs of the indoor condition (top left) and the running car condition (top right) on channel Cz. Deviant (bottom left) and standard (bottom right) ERPs in comparison between indoor and car condition.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Grand Averages of the alpha band time courses for relaxed and engaged conditions indoors and in the car. For the red and the green curve, displaying the relaxed conditions, a similar pattern starting 1 s after onset of stimulus presentation is observed. Similarities over time are also apparent for the engaged conditions, represented in the black and blue curve. Clear co-variation of indoor and in car alpha time courses for both relaxed and engaged conditions is proven by high correlation between the signals.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Shifts in electrode positions after movements of the head (A), the arms (B), and the whole body (C) in mm.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Mean score of questions about wearing comfort.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Mean alpha power in relaxed and engaged trials for individual subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Beiker S. A. (2012). Symposium, Legal Aspects of Autonomous Driving, 52. Santa Clara, CA, 1145.
    1. Berka C., Levendowski D. J., Lumicao M. N., Yau A., Davis G., Zivkovic V. T., et al. . (2007). EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78(Suppl. 1), B231–B244. - PubMed
    1. Blankertz B., Lemm S., Treder M., Haufe S., Müller K. R. (2011). Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components—a tutorial. Neuroimage 56, 814–825. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blankertz B., Tangermann M., Vidaurre C., Fazli S., Sannelli C., Haufe S., et al. . (2010). The berlin brain–computer interface: non-medical uses of BCI technology. Front. Neurosci. 4:198. 10.3389/fnins.2010.00198 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borghini G., Astolfi L., Vecchiato G., Mattia D., Babiloni F. (2014). Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload, fatigue and drowsiness. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 44, 58–75. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.10.00 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources