A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Aug 16;16(8):1298.
doi: 10.3390/s16081298.

A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques

Affiliations
Review

A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques

Mohammad Haji Gholizadeh et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Remotely sensed data can reinforce the abilities of water resources researchers and decision makers to monitor waterbodies more effectively. Remote sensing techniques have been widely used to measure the qualitative parameters of waterbodies (i.e., suspended sediments, colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), chlorophyll-a, and pollutants). A large number of different sensors on board various satellites and other platforms, such as airplanes, are currently used to measure the amount of radiation at different wavelengths reflected from the water's surface. In this review paper, various properties (spectral, spatial and temporal, etc.) of the more commonly employed spaceborne and airborne sensors are tabulated to be used as a sensor selection guide. Furthermore, this paper investigates the commonly used approaches and sensors employed in evaluating and quantifying the eleven water quality parameters. The parameters include: chlorophyll-a (chl-a), colored dissolved organic matters (CDOM), Secchi disk depth (SDD), turbidity, total suspended sediments (TSS), water temperature (WT), total phosphorus (TP), sea surface salinity (SSS), dissolved oxygen (DO), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD).

Keywords: airborne sensors; remote sensing; spaceborne sensors; water quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Absorption Spectrum of both the chlorophyll-a and the Chlorophyll-b pigments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spectral band positioning of Landsat7/ETM+ on ASD spectroradiometer spectrum [95].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Two different kinds of Secchi disks [183].
Figure 4
Figure 4
A suggested remote sensing based framework to predict and assessment of water quality variables.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sloggett D., Srokosz M., Aiken J., Boxall S. Operational Uses of Ocean Colour Data-Perspectives for the Octopus Programme. Balkema Publishers; Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 1995.
    1. Engman E.T., Gurney R.J. Remote Sensing in Hydrology. Chapman and Hall Ltd.; London, UK: 1991.
    1. Dekker A., Zamurović-Nenad Ž., Hoogenboom H., Peters S. Remote sensing, ecological water quality modelling and in situ measurements: A case study in shallow lakes. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1996;41:531–547. doi: 10.1080/02626669609491524. - DOI
    1. Duan W., Takara K., He B., Luo P., Nover D., Yamashiki Y. Spatial and temporal trends in estimates of nutrient and suspended sediment loads in the ishikari river, Japan, 1985 to 2010. Sci. Total Environ. 2013;461:499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duan W., He B., Takara K., Luo P., Nover D., Sahu N., Yamashiki Y. Spatiotemporal evaluation of water quality incidents in japan between 1996 and 2007. Chemosphere. 2013;93:946–953. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.060. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms