BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 May 17:2016:baw075.
doi: 10.1093/database/baw075. Print 2016.

BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences

Peter McQuilton  1 , Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran  2 , Philippe Rocca-Serra  2 , Milo Thurston  2 , Allyson Lister  2 , Eamonn Maguire  3 , Susanna-Assunta Sansone  2
Affiliations

BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences

Peter McQuilton et al. Database (Oxford). .

Abstract

BioSharing (http://www.biosharing.org) is a manually curated, searchable portal of three linked registries. These resources cover standards (terminologies, formats and models, and reporting guidelines), databases, and data policies in the life sciences, broadly encompassing the biological, environmental and biomedical sciences. Launched in 2011 and built by the same core team as the successful MIBBI portal, BioSharing harnesses community curation to collate and cross-reference resources across the life sciences from around the world. BioSharing makes these resources findable and accessible (the core of the FAIR principle). Every record is designed to be interlinked, providing a detailed description not only on the resource itself, but also on its relations with other life science infrastructures. Serving a variety of stakeholders, BioSharing cultivates a growing community, to which it offers diverse benefits. It is a resource for funding bodies and journal publishers to navigate the metadata landscape of the biological sciences; an educational resource for librarians and information advisors; a publicising platform for standard and database developers/curators; and a research tool for bench and computer scientists to plan their work. BioSharing is working with an increasing number of journals and other registries, for example linking standards and databases to training material and tools. Driven by an international Advisory Board, the BioSharing user-base has grown by over 40% (by unique IP address), in the last year thanks to successful engagement with researchers, publishers, librarians, developers and other stakeholders via several routes, including a joint RDA/Force11 working group and a collaboration with the International Society for Biocuration. In this article, we describe BioSharing, with a particular focus on community-led curation.Database URL: https://www.biosharing.org.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The BioSharing MIAPE Standard Record (top section). In the General Information section, the Taxonomic Range and Scope and data types tags are highlighted in a green box (A). Clicking on a tag from within these two fields initiates a search for all the records annotated with that tag. The Support section (B—highlighted in purple) contains information on help documentation, mailing lists and contact details. The Related Standards section (C—highlighted in red) contains links to other metadata standards, such as the extensions to the initial MIAPE standard. Beneath this section, the implementing databases section (D—highlighted in blue) provides links to those resources that have implemented the MIAPE standard (e.g. The PRIDE database).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The top section of the BioSharing Metabolights Database Record. Every record on BioSharing starts with a general information section, containing a description of the resource, and details of the domains and species that the resource covers. Further, more specific details are found in the boxes beneath this section. If a resource is selected in a Collection or Recommendation, this information is provided in the ‘In Collections’ section (A—highlighted in green). The standards implemented in the Metabolights database are found in the Related Standards section (B—highlighted in red), split into the three standard subtypes. The Metabolights database record is maintained by the resource themselves. This information is found in the Credit section (C—highlighted in blue). Clicking on the maintainer link takes you to the profile for the maintainer, with information linked from their ORCID account, if connected. This section also contains information on the group that has developed the resource and funding information. The Metabolights database is mentioned in four collections (as of November 2015). Clicking on any of the links in this section takes the user directly to the collection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Searching BioSharing. Every search in BioSharing returns a hit list displayed as either a table or grid. In this example search, for the text ‘cancer’, 56 records have been retrieved from across the three registries and collections. Each record ‘card’ provides a snapshot of information. Note that the first search hit is recommended, and the second search hit, caArray, is a deprecated database (A—both highlighted in green). This search can be defined further by clicking on the advanced search option in the top search section (B—highlighted in red), which leads to a field-specific search. The search can be refined using the filter matrix, found down the left-hand side of the search results (C—highlighted in blue). This filter allows the selection of records based on a range of information. For example, whether they have a publication associated with them, if they pertain to a particular species or domain, or are associated with a particular country or funding agency.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Findability of UK health datasets available for research: a mixed methods study.
    Griffiths E, Joseph RM, Tilston G, Thew S, Kapacee Z, Dixon W, Peek N. Griffiths E, et al. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Feb;29(1):e100325. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100325. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022. PMID: 35193857 Free PMC article.
  • The CEDAR Workbench: An Ontology-Assisted Environment for Authoring Metadata that Describe Scientific Experiments.
    Gonçalves RS, O'Connor MJ, Martínez-Romero M, Egyedi AL, Willrett D, Graybeal J, Musen MA. Gonçalves RS, et al. Semant Web ISWC. 2017 Oct;10588:103-110. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_10. Epub 2017 Oct 4. Semant Web ISWC. 2017. PMID: 32219223 Free PMC article.
  • The Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures NIH Program: System-Level Cataloging of Human Cells Response to Perturbations.
    Keenan AB, Jenkins SL, Jagodnik KM, Koplev S, He E, Torre D, Wang Z, Dohlman AB, Silverstein MC, Lachmann A, Kuleshov MV, Ma'ayan A, Stathias V, Terryn R, Cooper D, Forlin M, Koleti A, Vidovic D, Chung C, Schürer SC, Vasiliauskas J, Pilarczyk M, Shamsaei B, Fazel M, Ren Y, Niu W, Clark NA, White S, Mahi N, Zhang L, Kouril M, Reichard JF, Sivaganesan S, Medvedovic M, Meller J, Koch RJ, Birtwistle MR, Iyengar R, Sobie EA, Azeloglu EU, Kaye J, Osterloh J, Haston K, Kalra J, Finkbiener S, Li J, Milani P, Adam M, Escalante-Chong R, Sachs K, Lenail A, Ramamoorthy D, Fraenkel E, Daigle G, Hussain U, Coye A, Rothstein J, Sareen D, Ornelas L, Banuelos M, Mandefro B, Ho R, Svendsen CN, Lim RG, Stocksdale J, Casale MS, Thompson TG, Wu J, Thompson LM, Dardov V, Venkatraman V, Matlock A, Van Eyk JE, Jaffe JD, Papanastasiou M, Subramanian A, Golub TR, Erickson SD, Fallahi-Sichani M, Hafner M, Gray NS, Lin JR, Mills CE, Muhlich JL, Niepel M, Shamu CE, Williams EH, Wrobel D, Sorger PK, Heiser LM, Gray JW, Korkola JE, Mills GB, LaBarge M, Feiler HS, Dane MA, Bucher E, Nederlof M, Sudar D, Gross S, Kilburn DF, Smith R, Devlin K, Margolis R, Derr L, Lee A, Pillai A. Keenan AB, et al. Cell Syst. 2018 Jan 24;6(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Cell Syst. 2018. PMID: 29199020 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Cyberinfrastructure and resources to enable an integrative approach to studying forest trees.
    Wegrzyn JL, Falk T, Grau E, Buehler S, Ramnath R, Herndon N. Wegrzyn JL, et al. Evol Appl. 2019 Nov 3;13(1):228-241. doi: 10.1111/eva.12860. eCollection 2020 Jan. Evol Appl. 2019. PMID: 31892954 Free PMC article.
  • Sustainable data and metadata management at the BD2K-LINCS Data Coordination and Integration Center.
    Stathias V, Koleti A, Vidović D, Cooper DJ, Jagodnik KM, Terryn R, Forlin M, Chung C, Torre D, Ayad N, Medvedovic M, Ma'ayan A, Pillai A, Schürer SC. Stathias V, et al. Sci Data. 2018 Jun 19;5:180117. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.117. Sci Data. 2018. PMID: 29917015 Free PMC article.
See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Bourne P.E., Lorsch J.R., Green E.D. (2015) Perspective: Sustaining the big-data ecosystem. Nature, 527, S16–S17. - PubMed
    1. Tenenbaum J.D., Sansone S.-A., Haendel M. (2014) A sea of standards for omics data: sink or swim? J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 21, 200–203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson M.D., Dumontier M., Aalbersberg I.J., et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor C.F., Field D., Sansone S.-A., et al. (2008) Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 889–896. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kilkenny C., Browne W.J., Cuthill I.C., et al. (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol., 8, e1000412. oi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources