A low cost virtual reality system for home based rehabilitation of the arm following stroke: a randomised controlled feasibility trial - PubMed Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Mar;31(3):340-350.
doi: 10.1177/0269215516640320. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

A low cost virtual reality system for home based rehabilitation of the arm following stroke: a randomised controlled feasibility trial

P J Standen  1 , K Threapleton  2 , A Richardson  3 , L Connell  4 , D J Brown  5 , S Battersby  5 , F Platts  6 , A Burton  5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A low cost virtual reality system for home based rehabilitation of the arm following stroke: a randomised controlled feasibility trial

P J Standen et al. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of a home-based virtual reality system for rehabilitation of the arm following stroke.

Design: Two group feasibility randomised controlled trial of intervention versus usual care.

Setting: Patients' homes.

Participants: Patients aged 18 or over, with residual arm dysfunction following stroke and no longer receiving any other intensive rehabilitation.

Interventions: Eight weeks' use of a low cost home-based virtual reality system employing infra-red capture to translate the position of the hand into game play or usual care.

Main measures: The primary objective was to collect information on the feasibility of a trial, including recruitment, collection of outcome measures and staff support required. Patients were assessed at three time points using the Wolf Motor Function Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Motor Activity Log and Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living.

Results: Over 15 months only 47 people were referred to the team. Twenty seven were randomised and 18 (67%) of those completed final outcome measures. Sample size calculation based on data from the Wolf Motor Function Test indicated a requirement for 38 per group. There was a significantly greater change from baseline in the intervention group on midpoint Wolf Grip strength and two subscales of the final Motor Activity Log. Training in the use of the equipment took a median of 230 minutes per patient.

Conclusions: To achieve the required sample size, a definitive home-based trial would require additional strategies to boost recruitment rates and adequate resources for patient support.

Keywords: Rehabilitation; feasibility; stroke; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke, 4th edition. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2012.
    1. Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, van der Wees PJ, Hendriks E, Rietberg M, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87987. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCabe J, Monkiewicz M, Holcomb J, Pundik S, Daly JJ. Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2015; 96:981–990. - PubMed
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377:1693–1702. - PubMed
    1. Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: an abridged version of a Cochrane review. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015; 51:497–506. - PubMed

Publication types